HUBS vs. CROX
HUBS (HubSpot, Inc.) and CROX (Crocs, Inc.) are both stocks. HUBS operates in Software - Application (Technology), while CROX operates in Footwear & Accessories (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, HUBS returned 15.25%/yr vs 32.09%/yr for CROX. Their 0.32 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
HUBS vs. CROX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HUBS achieves a -40.21% return, which is significantly lower than CROX's 57.73% return. Over the past 10 years, HUBS has underperformed CROX with an annualized return of 15.25%, while CROX has yielded a comparatively higher 32.09% annualized return.
HUBS
- 1D
- 1.08%
- 1M
- 24.88%
- 6M
- -12.46%
- YTD
- -40.21%
- 1Y
- -51.87%
- 3Y*
- -20.84%
- 5Y*
- -16.47%
- 10Y*
- 15.25%
- ALL TIME*
- 18.29%
CROX
- 1D
- 5.37%
- 1M
- 7.67%
- 6M
- 55.26%
- YTD
- 57.73%
- 1Y
- 38.88%
- 3Y*
- 8.40%
- 5Y*
- -0.80%
- 10Y*
- 32.09%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.32%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
CROX Crocs, Inc. | $151.35M | $139.69M | $141.20M |
HUBS HubSpot, Inc. | $377.81M | $332.83M | $401.76M |
HUBS vs. CROX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HUBS HubSpot, Inc. | -40.21% | -42.41% | 20.02% | 100.79% | -56.14% | 66.27% | 150.12% | 26.06% | 42.23% | 88.09% |
CROX Crocs, Inc. | 57.73% | -21.92% | 17.26% | -13.85% | -15.43% | 104.63% | 49.58% | 61.24% | 105.54% | 84.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between HUBS and CROX is 0.15, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.27 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.39 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2014 | 0.32 |
The correlation between HUBS and CROX shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (1 year) to 0.39 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
HUBS:
$12.29B
CROX:
$6.47B
HUBS:
$1.91
CROX:
$11.49
HUBS:
125.87
CROX:
11.74
HUBS:
0.14
CROX:
0.24
HUBS:
3.83
CROX:
1.72
HUBS:
6.32
CROX:
4.89
HUBS:
$3.30B
CROX:
$4.05B
HUBS:
$2.76B
CROX:
$2.33B
HUBS:
$196.96M
CROX:
$803.31M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HUBS vs. CROX — Risk / Return Rank
HUBS
CROX
HUBS vs. CROX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS) and Crocs, Inc. (CROX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HUBS | CROX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.19 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.77 | 1.29 | -2.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.20 | 2.29 | -3.48 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HUBS vs. CROX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HUBS drawdown since its inception was -80.02%, smaller than the maximum CROX drawdown of -98.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUBS and CROX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HUBS | CROX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.02% | -98.74% | +18.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -67.44% | -30.19% | -37.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -79.23% | -54.04% | -25.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -80.02% | -73.86% | -6.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -80.02% | -75.18% | -4.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -71.84% | -25.30% | -46.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.81% | -61.07% | +37.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 43.40% | 17.03% | +26.37% |
Volatility
HUBS vs. CROX - Volatility Comparison
HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS) has a higher volatility of 22.92% compared to Crocs, Inc. (CROX) at 13.52%. This indicates that HUBS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CROX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HUBS | CROX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.92% | 13.52% | +9.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 57.63% | 34.40% | +23.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 67.44% | 53.79% | +13.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 56.06% | 55.32% | +0.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.19% | 55.57% | -4.38% |
Dividends
HUBS vs. CROX - Dividend Comparison
Neither HUBS nor CROX has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
HUBS vs. CROX - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between HubSpot, Inc. and Crocs, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
HUBS vs. CROX - Profitability Comparison
HUBS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, HubSpot, Inc. reported a gross profit of 735.30M and revenue of 881.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 83.5%.
CROX - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Crocs, Inc. reported a gross profit of 700.71M and revenue of 1.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.4%.
HUBS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, HubSpot, Inc. reported an operating income of 27.94M and revenue of 881.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.2%.
CROX - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Crocs, Inc. reported an operating income of 285.68M and revenue of 1.18B, resulting in an operating margin of 24.2%.
HUBS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, HubSpot, Inc. reported a net income of 32.55M and revenue of 881.00M, resulting in a net margin of 3.7%.
CROX - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Crocs, Inc. reported a net income of 204.89M and revenue of 1.18B, resulting in a net margin of 17.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
HUBS and CROX have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HUBS has higher volatility (22.92%) compared to CROX (13.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HUBS dropped -80.02% vs CROX's -98.74%.
CROX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.73 vs -0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HUBS and CROX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer