ROP vs. ^GSPC
ROP (Roper Technologies, Inc.) is a stock, while ^GSPC (S&P 500 Index) is an index. Over the past 10 years, ROP returned 9.41%/yr vs 13.26%/yr for ^GSPC. Their 0.50 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.
Performance
ROP vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ROP achieves a -11.32% return, which is significantly lower than ^GSPC's 9.41% return. Over the past 10 years, ROP has underperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of 9.41%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively higher 13.26% annualized return.
ROP
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- 7.89%
- 6M
- 6.12%
- YTD
- -11.32%
- 1Y
- -27.06%
- 3Y*
- -6.71%
- 5Y*
- -3.81%
- 10Y*
- 9.41%
- ALL TIME*
- 17.34%
^GSPC
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- 0.09%
- 6M
- 7.94%
- YTD
- 9.41%
- 1Y
- 20.07%
- 3Y*
- 17.84%
- 5Y*
- 11.25%
- 10Y*
- 13.26%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.09%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
^GSPC S&P 500 Index | $37.98T | $37.61T | $41.48T |
| $372.67M | $328.64M | $381.16M |
ROP vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ROP Roper Technologies, Inc. | -11.32% | -13.85% | -4.11% | 26.92% | -11.64% | 14.69% | 22.39% | 33.66% | 3.51% | 42.39% |
^GSPC S&P 500 Index | 9.41% | 16.39% | 23.31% | 24.23% | -19.44% | 26.89% | 16.26% | 28.88% | -6.24% | 19.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between ROP and ^GSPC is 0.08, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.52 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 1992 | 0.50 |
Over the past year, the correlation between ROP and ^GSPC has dropped to 0.08 - well below their long-term average of 0.50, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ROP vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank
ROP
^GSPC
ROP vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roper Technologies, Inc. (ROP) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ROP | ^GSPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | 1.25 | -0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.67 | 2.00 | -2.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.02 | 8.49 | -9.51 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ROP vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ROP drawdown since its inception was -58.94%, roughly equal to the maximum ^GSPC drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROP and ^GSPC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ROP | ^GSPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.94% | -56.78% | -2.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.04% | -9.10% | -32.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -46.51% | -18.90% | -27.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.51% | -25.43% | -21.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.51% | -33.92% | -12.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.22% | -1.58% | -31.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.54% | -10.70% | -0.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 28.12% | 2.14% | +25.98% |
Volatility
ROP vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison
Roper Technologies, Inc. (ROP) has a higher volatility of 13.55% compared to S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) at 3.51%. This indicates that ROP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ROP | ^GSPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.55% | 3.51% | +10.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.40% | 10.11% | +13.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.73% | 12.87% | +15.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.28% | 17.01% | +5.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.65% | 18.07% | +5.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ROP and ^GSPC have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ROP has higher volatility (13.55%) compared to ^GSPC (3.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROP dropped -58.94% vs ^GSPC's -56.78%.
^GSPC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs -0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ROP and ^GSPC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer