PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ROP vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ROP vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roper Technologies, Inc. (ROP) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ROP vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ROP
Roper Technologies, Inc.
-19.89%-13.85%-4.11%26.92%-11.64%14.69%22.39%33.66%3.51%42.39%
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index
-3.95%16.39%23.31%24.23%-19.44%26.89%16.26%28.88%-6.24%19.42%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROP achieves a -19.89% return, which is significantly lower than ^GSPC's -3.95% return. Over the past 10 years, ROP has underperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of 7.42%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively higher 12.24% annualized return.


ROP

1D
0.57%
1M
0.55%
YTD
-19.89%
6M
-28.27%
1Y
-39.36%
3Y*
-6.31%
5Y*
-2.26%
10Y*
7.42%

^GSPC

1D
0.72%
1M
-4.45%
YTD
-3.95%
6M
-2.02%
1Y
16.73%
3Y*
16.96%
5Y*
10.34%
10Y*
12.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ROP vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROP
ROP Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
ROP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROP Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROP Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
ROP Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROP Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
^GSPC Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
^GSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^GSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
^GSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
^GSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
^GSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROP vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roper Technologies, Inc. (ROP) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ROP^GSPCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-1.57

0.92

-2.48

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-2.22

1.41

-3.64

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.71

1.21

-0.51

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.85

1.41

-2.26

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.76

6.61

-8.37

ROP vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROP Sharpe Ratio is -1.57, which is lower than the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROP and ^GSPC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ROP^GSPCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.57

0.92

-2.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.11

0.61

-0.72

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

0.68

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.46

+0.05

Correlation

The correlation between ROP and ^GSPC is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Drawdowns

ROP vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROP drawdown since its inception was -58.94%, roughly equal to the maximum ^GSPC drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROP and ^GSPC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ROP^GSPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.94%

-56.78%

-2.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-46.20%

-12.14%

-34.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.51%

-25.43%

-21.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.51%

-33.92%

-12.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-39.67%

-5.78%

-33.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.26%

-10.75%

-0.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

22.35%

2.60%

+19.75%

Volatility

ROP vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

Roper Technologies, Inc. (ROP) has a higher volatility of 5.84% compared to S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) at 5.37%. This indicates that ROP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ROP^GSPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.84%

5.37%

+0.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.53%

9.55%

+10.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.23%

18.33%

+6.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.93%

16.90%

+4.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.19%

18.05%

+5.14%