HUBS vs. VOO
HUBS (HubSpot, Inc.) is a stock, while VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) is S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Over the past 10 years, HUBS returned 16.12%/yr vs 15.14%/yr for VOO. Their 0.48 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
HUBS vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HUBS achieves a -40.85% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 10.16% return. Over the past 10 years, HUBS has outperformed VOO with an annualized return of 16.12%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively lower 15.14% annualized return.
HUBS
- 1D
- 1.83%
- 1M
- 23.55%
- 6M
- -15.23%
- YTD
- -40.85%
- 1Y
- -52.39%
- 3Y*
- -25.60%
- 5Y*
- -16.82%
- 10Y*
- 16.12%
- ALL TIME*
- 18.20%
VOO
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- 6M
- 8.58%
- YTD
- 10.16%
- 1Y
- 21.58%
- 3Y*
- 19.42%
- 5Y*
- 12.83%
- 10Y*
- 15.14%
- ALL TIME*
- 14.78%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
HUBS HubSpot, Inc. | $399.60M | $327.29M | $400.40M |
| $3.82B | $3.78B | $5.44B |
HUBS vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HUBS HubSpot, Inc. | -40.85% | -42.41% | 20.02% | 100.79% | -56.14% | 66.27% | 150.12% | 26.06% | 42.23% | 88.09% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 10.16% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -4.50% | 21.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between HUBS and VOO is 0.12, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.48 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2014 | 0.48 |
Over the past year, the correlation between HUBS and VOO has dropped to 0.12 - well below their long-term average of 0.48, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HUBS vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
HUBS
VOO
HUBS vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HUBS | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 1.28 | -0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.81 | 2.21 | -3.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.26 | 9.44 | -10.69 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HUBS vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HUBS drawdown since its inception was -80.02%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUBS and VOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HUBS | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.02% | -33.99% | -46.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -67.44% | -8.90% | -58.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -79.23% | -18.69% | -60.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -80.02% | -24.52% | -55.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -80.02% | -33.99% | -46.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -72.14% | -1.38% | -70.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.80% | -3.67% | -20.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 43.33% | 2.08% | +41.25% |
Volatility
HUBS vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS) has a higher volatility of 22.95% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 3.54%. This indicates that HUBS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HUBS | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.95% | 3.54% | +19.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 57.62% | 10.10% | +47.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 67.48% | 12.82% | +54.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 56.04% | 16.93% | +39.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.34% | 18.01% | +33.33% |
Dividends
HUBS vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
HUBS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HUBS HubSpot, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.07% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HUBS and VOO have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HUBS has higher volatility (22.95%) compared to VOO (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HUBS dropped -80.02% vs VOO's -33.99%.
VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs -0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HUBS and VOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer