HUBS vs. STM
Compare and contrast key facts about HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS) and STMicroelectronics N.V. (STM).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: HUBS or STM.
Correlation
The correlation between HUBS and STM is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
HUBS vs. STM - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
HUBS:
0.74
STM:
-1.28
HUBS:
1.21
STM:
-1.95
HUBS:
1.16
STM:
0.77
HUBS:
0.58
STM:
-0.91
HUBS:
1.69
STM:
-1.59
HUBS:
16.15%
STM:
31.12%
HUBS:
36.72%
STM:
38.42%
HUBS:
-69.95%
STM:
-94.40%
HUBS:
-15.62%
STM:
-54.03%
Fundamentals
HUBS:
$38.29B
STM:
$23.24B
HUBS:
-$0.45
STM:
$2.43
HUBS:
3.55
STM:
19.08
HUBS:
$2.51B
STM:
$14.23B
HUBS:
$2.13B
STM:
$5.92B
HUBS:
$97.81M
STM:
$4.10B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HUBS achieves a 23.85% return, which is significantly higher than STM's -50.40% return. Over the past 10 years, HUBS has outperformed STM with an annualized return of 35.77%, while STM has yielded a comparatively lower 14.05% annualized return.
HUBS
23.85%
3.53%
24.30%
24.33%
35.23%
35.77%
STM
-50.40%
0.64%
-39.12%
-50.39%
-1.19%
14.05%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
HUBS vs. STM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS) and STMicroelectronics N.V. (STM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
HUBS vs. STM - Dividend Comparison
HUBS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while STM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HUBS HubSpot, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
STM STMicroelectronics N.V. | 1.34% | 0.48% | 0.82% | 0.45% | 0.50% | 0.86% | 1.47% | 0.93% | 2.10% | 5.11% | 4.55% | 4.25% |
Drawdowns
HUBS vs. STM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HUBS drawdown since its inception was -69.95%, smaller than the maximum STM drawdown of -94.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUBS and STM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
HUBS vs. STM - Volatility Comparison
HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS) has a higher volatility of 10.78% compared to STMicroelectronics N.V. (STM) at 8.00%. This indicates that HUBS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than STM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
HUBS vs. STM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between HubSpot, Inc. and STMicroelectronics N.V.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities