HUBS vs. STM
HUBS (HubSpot, Inc.) and STM (STMicroelectronics N.V.) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — HUBS in Software - Application, STM in Semiconductors. Over the past 10 years, HUBS returned 16.12%/yr vs 23.44%/yr for STM. Their 0.33 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
HUBS vs. STM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HUBS achieves a -40.85% return, which is significantly lower than STM's 102.77% return. Over the past 10 years, HUBS has underperformed STM with an annualized return of 16.12%, while STM has yielded a comparatively higher 23.44% annualized return.
HUBS
- 1D
- 1.83%
- 1M
- 23.55%
- 6M
- -15.23%
- YTD
- -40.85%
- 1Y
- -52.39%
- 3Y*
- -25.60%
- 5Y*
- -16.82%
- 10Y*
- 16.12%
- ALL TIME*
- 18.20%
STM
- 1D
- -1.26%
- 1M
- -23.35%
- 6M
- 88.59%
- YTD
- 102.77%
- 1Y
- 111.27%
- 3Y*
- 0.24%
- 5Y*
- 5.77%
- 10Y*
- 23.44%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.37%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
HUBS HubSpot, Inc. | $399.60M | $327.29M | $400.40M |
| $760.73M | $779.02M | $847.43M |
HUBS vs. STM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HUBS HubSpot, Inc. | -40.85% | -42.41% | 20.02% | 100.79% | -56.14% | 66.27% | 150.12% | 26.06% | 42.23% | 88.09% |
STM STMicroelectronics N.V. | 102.77% | 5.28% | -49.67% | 41.66% | -26.76% | 32.39% | 38.91% | 96.34% | -35.65% | 94.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between HUBS and STM is -0.09, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.31 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2014 | 0.33 |
The correlation between HUBS and STM shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.35 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
HUBS:
$12.16B
STM:
$46.76B
HUBS:
$1.91
STM:
$0.49
HUBS:
124.53
STM:
106.24
HUBS:
3.79
STM:
3.78
HUBS:
6.25
STM:
2.76
HUBS:
$3.30B
STM:
$13.08B
HUBS:
$2.76B
STM:
$4.49B
HUBS:
$196.96M
STM:
$2.21B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HUBS vs. STM — Risk / Return Rank
HUBS
STM
HUBS vs. STM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS) and STMicroelectronics N.V. (STM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HUBS | STM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 1.33 | -0.46 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.81 | 2.76 | -3.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.26 | 9.16 | -10.42 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HUBS vs. STM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HUBS drawdown since its inception was -80.02%, smaller than the maximum STM drawdown of -94.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUBS and STM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HUBS | STM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.02% | -94.40% | +14.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -67.44% | -39.41% | -28.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -79.23% | -64.58% | -14.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -80.02% | -66.66% | -13.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -80.02% | -66.66% | -13.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -72.14% | -34.36% | -37.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.80% | -55.03% | +31.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 43.33% | 11.85% | +31.48% |
Volatility
HUBS vs. STM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS) is 22.95%, while STMicroelectronics N.V. (STM) has a volatility of 28.39%. This indicates that HUBS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than STM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HUBS | STM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.95% | 28.39% | -5.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 57.62% | 51.19% | +6.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 67.48% | 59.10% | +8.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 56.04% | 47.04% | +9.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.34% | 45.13% | +6.21% |
Dividends
HUBS vs. STM - Dividend Comparison
HUBS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while STM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HUBS HubSpot, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
STM STMicroelectronics N.V. | 0.69% | 1.39% | 1.32% | 0.48% | 0.67% | 0.45% | 0.50% | 0.89% | 1.73% | 0.98% | 2.10% | 5.11% |
Financials
HUBS vs. STM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between HubSpot, Inc. and STMicroelectronics N.V.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
HUBS vs. STM - Profitability Comparison
HUBS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, HubSpot, Inc. reported a gross profit of 735.30M and revenue of 881.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 83.5%.
STM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, STMicroelectronics N.V. reported a gross profit of 1.22B and revenue of 3.49B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.8%.
HUBS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, HubSpot, Inc. reported an operating income of 27.94M and revenue of 881.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.2%.
STM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, STMicroelectronics N.V. reported an operating income of 220.00M and revenue of 3.49B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.3%.
HUBS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, HubSpot, Inc. reported a net income of 32.55M and revenue of 881.00M, resulting in a net margin of 3.7%.
STM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, STMicroelectronics N.V. reported a net income of 222.00M and revenue of 3.49B, resulting in a net margin of 6.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
HUBS and STM have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
STM has higher volatility (28.39%) compared to HUBS (22.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HUBS dropped -80.02% vs STM's -94.40%.
STM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs -0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HUBS and STM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer