PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
HUBS vs. STM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


HUBSSTM
YTD Return19.94%-47.58%
1Y Return48.68%-42.25%
3Y Return (Ann)-5.78%-19.53%
5Y Return (Ann)36.83%2.24%
10Y Return (Ann)34.24%15.79%
Sharpe Ratio1.45-1.04
Sortino Ratio1.98-1.42
Omega Ratio1.260.83
Calmar Ratio1.12-0.77
Martin Ratio3.28-1.48
Ulcer Index16.12%26.94%
Daily Std Dev36.41%38.24%
Max Drawdown-69.95%-94.40%
Current Drawdown-18.28%-51.42%

Fundamentals


HUBSSTM
Market Cap$35.14B$24.43B
EPS-$0.48$2.43
PEG Ratio3.2719.08
Total Revenue (TTM)$2.51B$14.23B
Gross Profit (TTM)$2.13B$5.92B
EBITDA (TTM)$2.95M$3.56B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between HUBS and STM is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

HUBS vs. STM - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, HUBS achieves a 19.94% return, which is significantly higher than STM's -47.58% return. Over the past 10 years, HUBS has outperformed STM with an annualized return of 34.24%, while STM has yielded a comparatively lower 15.79% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
14.08%
-37.41%
HUBS
STM

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

HUBS vs. STM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS) and STMicroelectronics N.V. (STM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HUBS
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for HUBS, currently valued at 1.45, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.45
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for HUBS, currently valued at 1.98, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.98
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for HUBS, currently valued at 1.26, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.26
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for HUBS, currently valued at 1.12, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.12
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for HUBS, currently valued at 3.28, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.003.28
STM
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for STM, currently valued at -1.04, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-1.04
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for STM, currently valued at -1.42, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.00-1.42
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for STM, currently valued at 0.83, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.83
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for STM, currently valued at -0.77, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.77
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for STM, currently valued at -1.48, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.00-1.48

HUBS vs. STM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HUBS Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is higher than the STM Sharpe Ratio of -1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HUBS and STM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.001.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.45
-1.04
HUBS
STM

Dividends

HUBS vs. STM - Dividend Comparison

HUBS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while STM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
HUBS
HubSpot, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
STM
STMicroelectronics N.V.
1.15%0.48%0.82%0.45%0.50%0.86%1.47%0.93%2.10%5.11%4.55%4.25%

Drawdowns

HUBS vs. STM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HUBS drawdown since its inception was -69.95%, smaller than the maximum STM drawdown of -94.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUBS and STM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-18.28%
-51.42%
HUBS
STM

Volatility

HUBS vs. STM - Volatility Comparison

HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS) and STMicroelectronics N.V. (STM) have volatilities of 9.98% and 9.99%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
9.98%
9.99%
HUBS
STM

Financials

HUBS vs. STM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between HubSpot, Inc. and STMicroelectronics N.V.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items