ROP vs. CSL
ROP (Roper Technologies, Inc.) and CSL (Carlisle Companies Incorporated) are both stocks. ROP operates in Software - Application (Technology), while CSL operates in Building Products & Equipment (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, ROP returned 9.41%/yr vs 14.60%/yr for CSL. Their 0.39 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
ROP vs. CSL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ROP achieves a -11.32% return, which is significantly lower than CSL's 13.20% return. Over the past 10 years, ROP has underperformed CSL with an annualized return of 9.41%, while CSL has yielded a comparatively higher 14.60% annualized return.
ROP
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- 7.89%
- 6M
- 6.12%
- YTD
- -11.32%
- 1Y
- -27.06%
- 3Y*
- -6.71%
- 5Y*
- -3.81%
- 10Y*
- 9.41%
- ALL TIME*
- 17.34%
CSL
- 1D
- -2.69%
- 1M
- -1.86%
- 6M
- 6.22%
- YTD
- 13.20%
- 1Y
- 3.38%
- 3Y*
- 10.15%
- 5Y*
- 13.44%
- 10Y*
- 14.60%
- ALL TIME*
- 15.13%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $192.98M | $195.31M | $163.99M | |
| $372.67M | $328.64M | $381.16M |
ROP vs. CSL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ROP Roper Technologies, Inc. | -11.32% | -13.85% | -4.11% | 26.92% | -11.64% | 14.69% | 22.39% | 33.66% | 3.51% | 42.39% |
CSL Carlisle Companies Incorporated | 13.20% | -12.26% | 19.14% | 34.26% | -4.08% | 60.64% | -1.96% | 63.10% | -10.31% | 4.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between ROP and CSL is 0.08, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.27 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.36 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 1992 | 0.39 |
Over the past year, the correlation between ROP and CSL has dropped to 0.08 - well below their long-term average of 0.39, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
ROP:
$39.56B
CSL:
$14.56B
ROP:
$23.66
CSL:
$17.39
ROP:
16.56
CSL:
20.69
ROP:
1.96
CSL:
0.54
ROP:
5.01
CSL:
2.94
ROP:
2.15
CSL:
9.08
ROP:
$8.28B
CSL:
$5.10B
ROP:
$5.76B
CSL:
$865.80M
ROP:
$4.27B
CSL:
$1.15B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ROP vs. CSL — Risk / Return Rank
ROP
CSL
ROP vs. CSL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roper Technologies, Inc. (ROP) and Carlisle Companies Incorporated (CSL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ROP | CSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | 1.05 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.67 | 0.11 | -0.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.02 | 0.18 | -1.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ROP vs. CSL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ROP drawdown since its inception was -58.94%, smaller than the maximum CSL drawdown of -64.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROP and CSL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ROP | CSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.94% | -64.56% | +5.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.04% | -25.48% | -16.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -46.51% | -37.72% | -8.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.51% | -37.72% | -8.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.51% | -38.68% | -7.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.22% | -23.66% | -9.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.54% | -12.36% | +0.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 28.12% | 15.31% | +12.81% |
Volatility
ROP vs. CSL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Roper Technologies, Inc. (ROP) is 13.55%, while Carlisle Companies Incorporated (CSL) has a volatility of 15.99%. This indicates that ROP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CSL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ROP | CSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.55% | 15.99% | -2.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.40% | 30.09% | -6.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.73% | 39.89% | -11.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.28% | 31.93% | -9.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.65% | 30.23% | -6.58% |
Dividends
ROP vs. CSL - Dividend Comparison
ROP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, less than CSL's 1.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSL Carlisle Companies Incorporated | 1.22% | 1.31% | 1.00% | 1.02% | 1.09% | 0.86% | 1.31% | 1.11% | 1.53% | 1.27% | 1.18% | 1.24% |
ROP Roper Technologies, Inc. | 0.91% | 0.74% | 0.58% | 0.50% | 0.57% | 0.46% | 0.48% | 0.52% | 0.62% | 0.54% | 0.66% | 0.53% |
Financials
ROP vs. CSL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Roper Technologies, Inc. and Carlisle Companies Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ROP vs. CSL - Profitability Comparison
ROP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Roper Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.47B and revenue of 2.11B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 69.7%.
CSL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Carlisle Companies Incorporated reported a gross profit of -363.20M and revenue of 1.57B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -23.1%.
ROP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Roper Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of 584.70M and revenue of 2.11B, resulting in an operating margin of 27.7%.
CSL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Carlisle Companies Incorporated reported an operating income of 352.50M and revenue of 1.57B, resulting in an operating margin of 22.5%.
ROP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Roper Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of 1.17B and revenue of 2.11B, resulting in a net margin of 55.4%.
CSL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Carlisle Companies Incorporated reported a net income of 255.20M and revenue of 1.57B, resulting in a net margin of 16.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ROP and CSL have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CSL has higher volatility (15.99%) compared to ROP (13.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROP dropped -58.94% vs CSL's -64.56%.
CSL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.07 vs -0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ROP and CSL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer