PortfoliosLab logo
HUBS vs. SPOT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between HUBS and SPOT is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

HUBS vs. SPOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS) and Spotify Technology S.A. (SPOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

HUBS:

81.66%

SPOT:

36.34%

Max Drawdown

HUBS:

-8.68%

SPOT:

-1.35%

Current Drawdown

HUBS:

-8.68%

SPOT:

-1.35%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

HUBS:

$31.74B

SPOT:

$132.93B

EPS

HUBS:

-$0.42

SPOT:

$6.31

PEG Ratio

HUBS:

0.72

SPOT:

1.59

PS Ratio

HUBS:

12.08

SPOT:

8.19

PB Ratio

HUBS:

17.76

SPOT:

18.82

Total Revenue (TTM)

HUBS:

$2.01B

SPOT:

$16.23B

Gross Profit (TTM)

HUBS:

$1.71B

SPOT:

$5.03B

EBITDA (TTM)

HUBS:

$116.11M

SPOT:

$1.62B

Returns By Period


HUBS

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

SPOT

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

HUBS vs. SPOT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HUBS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of HUBS is 4848
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of HUBS is 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of HUBS is 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of HUBS is 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of HUBS is 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of HUBS is 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

SPOT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SPOT is 9797
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SPOT is 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SPOT is 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SPOT is 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SPOT is 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SPOT is 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

HUBS vs. SPOT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS) and Spotify Technology S.A. (SPOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Dividends

HUBS vs. SPOT - Dividend Comparison

Neither HUBS nor SPOT has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

HUBS vs. SPOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HUBS drawdown since its inception was -8.68%, which is greater than SPOT's maximum drawdown of -1.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUBS and SPOT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

HUBS vs. SPOT - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...

Financials

HUBS vs. SPOT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between HubSpot, Inc. and Spotify Technology S.A.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B20212022202320242025
703.17M
4.19B
(HUBS) Total Revenue
(SPOT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

HUBS vs. SPOT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between HubSpot, Inc. and Spotify Technology S.A. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%20212022202320242025
85.3%
31.7%
(HUBS) Gross Margin
(SPOT) Gross Margin
HUBS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, HubSpot, Inc. reported a gross profit of 599.80M and revenue of 703.17M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 85.3%.

SPOT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Spotify Technology S.A. reported a gross profit of 1.33B and revenue of 4.19B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.7%.

HUBS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, HubSpot, Inc. reported an operating income of -10.80M and revenue of 703.17M, resulting in an operating margin of -1.5%.

SPOT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Spotify Technology S.A. reported an operating income of 509.00M and revenue of 4.19B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.2%.

HUBS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, HubSpot, Inc. reported a net income of 4.98M and revenue of 703.17M, resulting in a net margin of 0.7%.

SPOT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Spotify Technology S.A. reported a net income of 225.00M and revenue of 4.19B, resulting in a net margin of 5.4%.