ROM vs. QQH
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM) and HCM Defender 100 Index ETF (QQH).
ROM and QQH are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ROM is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Technology Index (200%). It was launched on Jan 30, 2007. QQH is a passively managed fund by Howard Capital Management that tracks the performance of the HCM Defender 100 Index. It was launched on Oct 10, 2019. Both ROM and QQH are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
ROM vs. QQH - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ROM vs. QQH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ROM ProShares Ultra Technology | -16.84% | 35.63% | 31.65% | 130.70% | -63.86% | 77.75% | 80.42% | 29.56% |
QQH HCM Defender 100 Index ETF | -9.74% | 15.66% | 33.64% | 48.05% | -39.60% | 37.52% | 41.71% | 15.13% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ROM achieves a -16.84% return, which is significantly lower than QQH's -9.74% return.
ROM
- 1D
- 8.36%
- 1M
- -8.93%
- YTD
- -16.84%
- 6M
- -15.35%
- 1Y
- 47.16%
- 3Y*
- 31.37%
- 5Y*
- 14.97%
- 10Y*
- 31.73%
QQH
- 1D
- 1.53%
- 1M
- -6.67%
- YTD
- -9.74%
- 6M
- -8.31%
- 1Y
- 19.66%
- 3Y*
- 21.34%
- 5Y*
- 10.55%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ROM vs. QQH - Expense Ratio Comparison
ROM has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than QQH's 1.14% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ROM vs. QQH — Risk / Return Rank
ROM
QQH
ROM vs. QQH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM) and HCM Defender 100 Index ETF (QQH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ROM | QQH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.88 | 0.88 | 0.00 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.49 | 1.30 | +0.19 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.17 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.48 | 1.25 | +0.23 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.42 | 3.73 | +0.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ROM | QQH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 | 0.88 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | 0.49 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.70 | -0.26 |
Correlation
The correlation between ROM and QQH is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ROM vs. QQH - Dividend Comparison
ROM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.29%, more than QQH's 0.23% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ROM ProShares Ultra Technology | 0.29% | 0.24% | 0.21% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.05% | 0.16% | 0.30% | 0.08% | 0.20% | 0.12% |
QQH HCM Defender 100 Index ETF | 0.23% | 0.21% | 0.24% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
ROM vs. QQH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ROM drawdown since its inception was -83.36%, which is greater than QQH's maximum drawdown of -41.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROM and QQH.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ROM | QQH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.36% | -41.87% | -41.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.33% | -16.18% | -16.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -67.55% | -41.87% | -25.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -67.55% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.67% | -14.90% | -11.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.02% | -13.14% | -7.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.81% | 5.41% | +5.40% |
Volatility
ROM vs. QQH - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM) has a higher volatility of 16.01% compared to HCM Defender 100 Index ETF (QQH) at 6.43%. This indicates that ROM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ROM | QQH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.01% | 6.43% | +9.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.95% | 16.70% | +16.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 53.78% | 22.37% | +31.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.32% | 21.68% | +29.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.50% | 24.87% | +24.63% |