ROM vs. SOXX
ROM (ProShares Ultra Technology) and SOXX (iShares Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ROM is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P Technology Select Sector Index (200%), while SOXX is a Semiconductors fund tracking the NYSE Semiconductor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ROM returned 43.20%/yr vs 37.20%/yr for SOXX. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ROM charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for SOXX.
Performance
ROM vs. SOXX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ROM achieves a 68.28% return, which is significantly lower than SOXX's 117.74% return. Over the past 10 years, ROM has outperformed SOXX with an annualized return of 43.20%, while SOXX has yielded a comparatively lower 37.20% annualized return.
ROM
- 1D
- 1.04%
- 1M
- 11.73%
- YTD
- 68.28%
- 6M
- 64.98%
- 1Y
- 131.63%
- 3Y*
- 55.44%
- 5Y*
- 28.14%
- 10Y*
- 43.20%
SOXX
- 1D
- 2.43%
- 1M
- 21.96%
- YTD
- 117.74%
- 6M
- 115.81%
- 1Y
- 192.33%
- 3Y*
- 60.51%
- 5Y*
- 36.36%
- 10Y*
- 37.20%
ROM vs. SOXX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ROM ProShares Ultra Technology | 68.28% | 35.63% | 31.65% | 130.70% | -63.86% | 77.75% | 80.42% | 102.10% | -9.89% | 81.11% |
SOXX iShares Semiconductor ETF | 117.74% | 40.74% | 12.92% | 67.12% | -35.09% | 44.09% | 52.72% | 62.42% | -6.49% | 39.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between ROM and SOXX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2007 | 0.86 |
The correlation between ROM and SOXX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
ROM vs. SOXX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ROM
SOXX
Technology
Financial Services
-
Energy
-
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
ROM
SOXX
Financial Services
ROM
SOXX
-
Energy
ROM
SOXX
-
Industrials
ROM
SOXX
-
Basic Materials
ROM
-
SOXX
-
Communication Services
ROM
-
SOXX
-
Consumer Cyclical
ROM
-
SOXX
-
Consumer Defensive
ROM
-
SOXX
-
Healthcare
ROM
-
SOXX
-
Real Estate
ROM
-
SOXX
-
Utilities
ROM
-
SOXX
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ROM vs. SOXX — Risk / Return Rank
ROM
SOXX
ROM vs. SOXX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM) and iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ROM | SOXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.68 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.10 | 12.28 | -8.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.05 | 44.42 | -32.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ROM vs. SOXX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ROM drawdown since its inception was -83.36%, which is greater than SOXX's maximum drawdown of -70.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROM and SOXX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ROM | SOXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.36% | -70.21% | -13.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.33% | -15.77% | -16.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.10% | -41.36% | -6.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -67.55% | -45.75% | -21.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -67.55% | -45.75% | -21.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.22% | 0.00% | -7.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.85% | -19.94% | -0.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.97% | 4.35% | +6.62% |
Volatility
ROM vs. SOXX - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM) has a higher volatility of 23.70% compared to iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX) at 20.75%. This indicates that ROM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SOXX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ROM | SOXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 23.70% | 20.75% | +2.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.65% | 32.29% | +6.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.41% | 38.61% | +7.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 52.40% | 37.03% | +15.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.24% | 33.95% | +16.29% |
ROM vs. SOXX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ROM has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SOXX's 0.34% expense ratio.
Dividends
ROM vs. SOXX - Dividend Comparison
ROM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, less than SOXX's 0.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ROM ProShares Ultra Technology | 0.14% | 0.24% | 0.21% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.05% | 0.16% | 0.30% | 0.08% | 0.20% | 0.12% |
SOXX iShares Semiconductor ETF | 0.22% | 0.57% | 0.67% | 0.78% | 1.26% | 0.64% | 0.81% | 1.23% | 1.37% | 0.90% | 1.08% | 1.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ROM and SOXX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ROM has higher volatility (23.70%) compared to SOXX (20.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROM dropped -83.36% vs SOXX's -70.21%.
On 10-year performance, ROM leads with 43.20% vs 37.20% for SOXX. On fees, SOXX is cheaper at 0.34% per year. On volatility, SOXX has been the lower-risk option at 20.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ROM has performed better with a 43.20% return vs 37.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SOXX is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for ROM.
SOXX has the higher dividend yield at 0.22%, compared with 0.14% for ROM.
ROM is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while SOXX is Semiconductors. ROM tracks S&P Technology Select Sector Index (200%), while SOXX tracks NYSE Semiconductor Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for ROM and 0.34% for SOXX.
SOXX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.02 vs 2.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ROM and SOXX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer