PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ROM vs. TQQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ROM vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ROM vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ROM
ProShares Ultra Technology
-16.84%35.63%31.65%130.70%-63.86%77.75%80.42%102.10%-9.89%81.11%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
-20.81%34.35%58.27%198.04%-79.09%82.98%110.05%133.84%-19.79%118.06%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROM achieves a -16.84% return, which is significantly higher than TQQQ's -20.81% return. Over the past 10 years, ROM has underperformed TQQQ with an annualized return of 31.73%, while TQQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 34.82% annualized return.


ROM

1D
8.36%
1M
-8.93%
YTD
-16.84%
6M
-15.35%
1Y
47.16%
3Y*
31.37%
5Y*
14.97%
10Y*
31.73%

TQQQ

1D
10.00%
1M
-15.69%
YTD
-20.81%
6M
-19.12%
1Y
46.49%
3Y*
45.09%
5Y*
12.72%
10Y*
34.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ROM vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ROM and TQQQ have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


Return for Risk

ROM vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROM
ROM Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
ROM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROM Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
ROM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROM Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

TQQQ
TQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
TQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
TQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
TQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
TQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROM vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ROMTQQQDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.88

0.69

+0.19

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.49

1.37

+0.12

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.19

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.48

1.25

+0.22

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.42

3.87

+0.56

ROM vs. TQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROM Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is comparable to the TQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROM and TQQQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ROMTQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

0.69

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

0.19

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

0.53

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.64

-0.20

Correlation

The correlation between ROM and TQQQ is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

ROM vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison

ROM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.29%, less than TQQQ's 0.76% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ROM
ProShares Ultra Technology
0.29%0.24%0.21%0.01%0.00%0.00%0.05%0.16%0.30%0.08%0.20%0.12%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
0.76%0.65%1.27%1.26%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.06%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.01%

Drawdowns

ROM vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROM drawdown since its inception was -83.36%, roughly equal to the maximum TQQQ drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROM and TQQQ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ROMTQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.36%

-81.66%

-1.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.33%

-36.97%

+4.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-67.55%

-81.66%

+14.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-67.55%

-81.66%

+14.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.67%

-30.66%

+3.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.02%

-18.66%

-2.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.81%

12.00%

-1.19%

Volatility

ROM vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM) is 16.01%, while ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) has a volatility of 19.43%. This indicates that ROM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ROMTQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.01%

19.43%

-3.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.95%

38.32%

-5.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

53.78%

67.26%

-13.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

51.32%

66.55%

-15.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.50%

65.83%

-16.33%