ROM vs. QLD
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD).
ROM and QLD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ROM is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Technology Index (200%). It was launched on Jan 30, 2007. QLD is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index (200%). It was launched on Jun 21, 2006. Both ROM and QLD are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ROM or QLD.
Performance
ROM vs. QLD - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ROM achieves a 28.25% return, which is significantly lower than QLD's 35.76% return. Over the past 10 years, ROM has outperformed QLD with an annualized return of 30.69%, while QLD has yielded a comparatively lower 28.55% annualized return.
ROM
28.25%
-1.56%
10.13%
40.89%
30.37%
30.69%
QLD
35.76%
1.40%
15.29%
52.09%
30.32%
28.55%
Key characteristics
| ROM | QLD | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.97 | 1.50 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.45 | 1.99 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.19 | 1.27 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.31 | 1.96 |
| Martin Ratio | 3.97 | 6.52 |
| Ulcer Index | 10.65% | 8.03% |
| Daily Std Dev | 43.64% | 34.85% |
| Max Drawdown | -83.36% | -83.13% |
| Current Drawdown | -11.84% | -6.92% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ROM vs. QLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both ROM and QLD have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Correlation
The correlation between ROM and QLD is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ROM vs. QLD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ROM vs. QLD - Dividend Comparison
ROM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, less than QLD's 0.28% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ROM ProShares Ultra Technology | 0.17% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.05% | 0.16% | 0.30% | 0.08% | 0.20% | 0.12% | 0.24% | 0.03% |
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ | 0.28% | 0.33% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.13% | 0.06% | 0.02% | 0.90% | 0.11% | 0.19% | 0.13% |
Drawdowns
ROM vs. QLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ROM drawdown since its inception was -83.36%, roughly equal to the maximum QLD drawdown of -83.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROM and QLD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ROM vs. QLD - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM) has a higher volatility of 12.52% compared to ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) at 11.27%. This indicates that ROM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.