ROM vs. TECL
ROM (ProShares Ultra Technology) and TECL (Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds - ROM tracks the S&P Technology Select Sector Index (200%) while TECL tracks the Technology Select Sector Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ROM returned 43.20%/yr vs 54.55%/yr for TECL. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. ROM charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.91%/yr for TECL.
Performance
ROM vs. TECL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ROM achieves a 68.28% return, which is significantly lower than TECL's 104.37% return. Over the past 10 years, ROM has underperformed TECL with an annualized return of 43.20%, while TECL has yielded a comparatively higher 54.55% annualized return.
ROM
- 1D
- 1.04%
- 1M
- 11.73%
- YTD
- 68.28%
- 6M
- 64.98%
- 1Y
- 131.63%
- 3Y*
- 55.44%
- 5Y*
- 28.14%
- 10Y*
- 43.20%
TECL
- 1D
- 1.43%
- 1M
- 15.41%
- YTD
- 104.37%
- 6M
- 98.56%
- 1Y
- 218.70%
- 3Y*
- 73.29%
- 5Y*
- 37.90%
- 10Y*
- 54.55%
ROM vs. TECL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ROM ProShares Ultra Technology | 68.28% | 35.63% | 31.65% | 130.70% | -63.86% | 77.75% | 80.42% | 102.10% | -9.89% | 81.11% |
TECL Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares | 104.37% | 38.60% | 36.15% | 203.14% | -74.32% | 112.80% | 69.46% | 185.58% | -24.03% | 124.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between ROM and TECL is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2008 | 0.98 |
The correlation between ROM and TECL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
ROM vs. TECL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ROM
TECL
Technology
Financial Services
-
Energy
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
ROM
TECL
Financial Services
ROM
TECL
-
Energy
ROM
TECL
Industrials
ROM
TECL
Basic Materials
ROM
-
TECL
-
Communication Services
ROM
-
TECL
-
Consumer Cyclical
ROM
-
TECL
-
Consumer Defensive
ROM
-
TECL
-
Healthcare
ROM
-
TECL
-
Real Estate
ROM
-
TECL
-
Utilities
ROM
-
TECL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ROM vs. TECL — Risk / Return Rank
ROM
TECL
ROM vs. TECL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM) and Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares (TECL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ROM | TECL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.40 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.10 | 4.73 | -0.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.05 | 13.09 | -1.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ROM vs. TECL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ROM drawdown since its inception was -83.36%, which is greater than TECL's maximum drawdown of -77.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROM and TECL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ROM | TECL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.36% | -77.96% | -5.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.33% | -46.58% | +14.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.10% | -66.58% | +18.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -67.55% | -77.96% | +10.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -67.55% | -77.96% | +10.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.22% | -12.23% | +5.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.85% | -18.38% | -2.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.97% | 16.79% | -5.82% |
Volatility
ROM vs. TECL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM) is 23.70%, while Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares (TECL) has a volatility of 35.62%. This indicates that ROM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TECL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ROM | TECL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 23.70% | 35.62% | -11.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.65% | 57.86% | -19.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.41% | 68.99% | -22.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 52.40% | 75.28% | -22.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.24% | 73.00% | -22.76% |
ROM vs. TECL - Expense Ratio Comparison
ROM has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than TECL's 0.91% expense ratio.
Dividends
ROM vs. TECL - Dividend Comparison
ROM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, less than TECL's 3.48% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ROM ProShares Ultra Technology | 0.14% | 0.24% | 0.21% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.05% | 0.16% | 0.30% | 0.08% | 0.20% | 0.12% |
TECL Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares | 3.48% | 7.19% | 0.29% | 0.28% | 0.22% | 0.32% | 0.52% | 0.25% | 0.47% | 0.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, ROM and TECL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
TECL has higher volatility (35.62%) compared to ROM (23.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROM dropped -83.36% vs TECL's -77.96%.
On 10-year performance, TECL leads with 54.55% vs 43.20% for ROM. On fees, TECL is cheaper at 0.91% per year. On volatility, ROM has been the lower-risk option at 23.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, TECL has performed better with a 54.55% return vs 43.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TECL is cheaper with a 0.91% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for ROM.
TECL has the higher dividend yield at 3.48%, compared with 0.14% for ROM.
ROM tracks S&P Technology Select Sector Index (200%), while TECL tracks Technology Select Sector Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for ROM and 0.91% for TECL.
TECL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.20 vs 2.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ROM and TECL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer