PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RNGR vs. HRTG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RNGR vs. HRTG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ranger Energy Services, Inc. (RNGR) and Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. (HRTG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RNGR achieves a 15.65% return, which is significantly higher than HRTG's 0.38% return.


RNGR

1D
3.35%
1M
4.09%
6M
4.85%
YTD
15.65%
1Y
28.32%
3Y*
17.29%
5Y*
16.00%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.13%

HRTG

1D
-2.00%
1M
8.30%
6M
12.66%
YTD
0.38%
1Y
39.79%
3Y*
85.11%
5Y*
33.17%
10Y*
10.64%
ALL TIME*
9.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$8.52M$7.69M$10.91M
$3.55M$3.42M$3.44M

RNGR vs. HRTG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RNGR
Ranger Energy Services, Inc.
15.65%-7.94%53.89%-6.26%7.21%182.14%-43.48%24.56%-43.99%-34.07%
HRTG
Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc.
0.38%141.82%85.58%262.22%-68.58%-40.09%-21.80%-8.50%-17.06%61.35%

Correlation

The correlation between RNGR and HRTG is 0.05, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 11, 2017

0.08

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RNGR:

$375.60M

HRTG:

$891.38M

EPS

RNGR:

$0.61

HRTG:

$6.53

PE Ratio

RNGR:

26.19

HRTG:

4.50

PEG Ratio

RNGR:

3.74

HRTG:

0.03

PS Ratio

RNGR:

0.62

HRTG:

1.07

PB Ratio

RNGR:

1.27

HRTG:

1.73

Total Revenue (TTM)

RNGR:

$606.70M

HRTG:

$848.47M

Gross Profit (TTM)

RNGR:

$20.10M

HRTG:

$333.64M

EBITDA (TTM)

RNGR:

$80.60M

HRTG:

$285.21M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RNGR vs. HRTG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RNGR
RNGR Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
RNGR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RNGR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
RNGR Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
RNGR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
RNGR Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

HRTG
HRTG Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
HRTG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HRTG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
HRTG Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
HRTG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
HRTG Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RNGR vs. HRTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ranger Energy Services, Inc. (RNGR) and Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. (HRTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RNGRHRTGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.17

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.05

1.20

-0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.74

2.62

+0.12

RNGR vs. HRTG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RNGR Sharpe Ratio is 0.61, which is comparable to the HRTG Sharpe Ratio of 0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RNGR and HRTG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RNGR vs. HRTG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RNGR drawdown since its inception was -85.16%, smaller than the maximum HRTG drawdown of -94.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RNGR and HRTG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RNGRHRTGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.16%

-94.36%

+9.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.86%

-32.95%

+12.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-40.52%

-43.90%

+3.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.52%

-81.56%

+41.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-92.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.58%

-5.68%

-6.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-38.92%

-46.17%

+7.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.06%

15.00%

-6.94%

Volatility

RNGR vs. HRTG - Volatility Comparison

Ranger Energy Services, Inc. (RNGR) and Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. (HRTG) have volatilities of 11.86% and 11.52%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RNGRHRTGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.86%

11.52%

+0.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.24%

38.45%

-13.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.33%

56.94%

-20.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.93%

71.51%

-30.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

54.94%

58.04%

-3.10%

Dividends

RNGR vs. HRTG - Dividend Comparison

RNGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%, while HRTG has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HRTG
Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%6.67%4.08%2.37%1.81%1.63%1.33%1.47%0.23%
RNGR
Ranger Energy Services, Inc.
1.50%1.72%1.29%0.98%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

RNGR vs. HRTG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ranger Energy Services, Inc. and Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

RNGR vs. HRTG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Ranger Energy Services, Inc. and Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

RNGR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ranger Energy Services, Inc. reported a gross profit of -12.30M and revenue of 176.50M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -7.0%.

HRTG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 212.66M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

RNGR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ranger Energy Services, Inc. reported an operating income of 12.40M and revenue of 176.50M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.0%.

HRTG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 50.82M and revenue of 212.66M, resulting in an operating margin of 23.9%.

RNGR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ranger Energy Services, Inc. reported a net income of 6.90M and revenue of 176.50M, resulting in a net margin of 3.9%.

HRTG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 36.48M and revenue of 212.66M, resulting in a net margin of 17.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


RNGR and HRTG have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RNGR has higher volatility (11.86%) compared to HRTG (11.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RNGR dropped -85.16% vs HRTG's -94.36%.

HRTG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.69 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RNGR and HRTG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer