PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RNGR vs. HBB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RNGR vs. HBB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ranger Energy Services, Inc. (RNGR) and Hamilton Beach Brands Holding Company (HBB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RNGR achieves a 15.94% return, which is significantly lower than HBB's 31.73% return.


RNGR

1D
2.22%
1M
1.51%
6M
12.55%
YTD
15.94%
1Y
32.92%
3Y*
18.53%
5Y*
11.25%
10Y*

HBB

1D
3.28%
1M
5.37%
6M
12.68%
YTD
31.73%
1Y
13.06%
3Y*
32.86%
5Y*
3.35%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RNGR vs. HBB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RNGR
Ranger Energy Services, Inc.
15.94%-7.94%53.89%-6.26%7.21%182.14%-43.48%24.56%-43.99%-37.21%
HBB
Hamilton Beach Brands Holding Company
31.73%0.52%-1.60%46.40%-10.86%-16.17%-6.01%-17.00%-7.40%-21.58%

Correlation

The correlation between RNGR and HBB is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2017

0.07

The correlation between RNGR and HBB shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (all time) to 0.19 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RNGR:

$382.32M

HBB:

$288.95M

EPS

RNGR:

$0.64

HBB:

$2.09

PE Ratio

RNGR:

25.10

HBB:

10.26

PEG Ratio

RNGR:

3.59

HBB:

1.47

PS Ratio

RNGR:

0.65

HBB:

0.49

PB Ratio

RNGR:

1.29

HBB:

1.57

Total Revenue (TTM)

RNGR:

$570.80M

HBB:

$595.44M

Gross Profit (TTM)

RNGR:

$34.80M

HBB:

$159.57M

EBITDA (TTM)

RNGR:

$74.50M

HBB:

$43.51M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RNGR vs. HBB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RNGR
RNGR Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
RNGR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RNGR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
RNGR Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
RNGR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
RNGR Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

HBB
HBB Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
HBB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HBB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
HBB Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
HBB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
HBB Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RNGR vs. HBB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ranger Energy Services, Inc. (RNGR) and Hamilton Beach Brands Holding Company (HBB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RNGRHBBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.08

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.89

0.31

+1.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.00

0.60

+3.40

RNGR vs. HBB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RNGR Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is higher than the HBB Sharpe Ratio of 0.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RNGR and HBB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RNGR vs. HBB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RNGR drawdown since its inception was -85.16%, roughly equal to the maximum HBB drawdown of -81.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RNGR and HBB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RNGRHBBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.16%

-81.89%

-3.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.48%

-33.03%

+15.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-40.52%

-57.65%

+17.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.52%

-57.65%

+17.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.36%

-33.48%

+21.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-39.08%

-50.45%

+11.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.25%

18.20%

-9.95%

Volatility

RNGR vs. HBB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ranger Energy Services, Inc. (RNGR) is 7.83%, while Hamilton Beach Brands Holding Company (HBB) has a volatility of 12.53%. This indicates that RNGR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HBB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RNGRHBBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.83%

12.53%

-4.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.90%

38.69%

-13.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.20%

53.87%

-14.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.25%

54.23%

-10.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

55.01%

57.99%

-2.98%

Dividends

RNGR vs. HBB - Dividend Comparison

RNGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, less than HBB's 2.27% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
HBB
Hamilton Beach Brands Holding Company
2.27%2.89%2.70%2.49%3.35%2.75%2.11%1.86%1.45%0.33%
RNGR
Ranger Energy Services, Inc.
1.49%1.72%1.29%0.98%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

RNGR vs. HBB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ranger Energy Services, Inc. and Hamilton Beach Brands Holding Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


50.00M100.00M150.00M200.00MJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
159.10M
121.96M
(RNGR) Total Revenue
(HBB) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

RNGR vs. HBB - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Ranger Energy Services, Inc. and Hamilton Beach Brands Holding Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-5.0%0.0%5.0%10.0%15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober20260
29.7%
Portfolio components
RNGR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Ranger Energy Services, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 159.10M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

HBB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Hamilton Beach Brands Holding Company reported a gross profit of 36.19M and revenue of 121.96M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 29.7%.

RNGR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Ranger Energy Services, Inc. reported an operating income of 5.10M and revenue of 159.10M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.2%.

HBB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Hamilton Beach Brands Holding Company reported an operating income of 4.97M and revenue of 121.96M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.1%.

RNGR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Ranger Energy Services, Inc. reported a net income of 3.00M and revenue of 159.10M, resulting in a net margin of 1.9%.

HBB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Hamilton Beach Brands Holding Company reported a net income of 3.54M and revenue of 121.96M, resulting in a net margin of 2.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


RNGR and HBB have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HBB has higher volatility (12.53%) compared to RNGR (7.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RNGR dropped -85.16% vs HBB's -81.89%.

RNGR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.84 vs 0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RNGR and HBB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer