PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RNGR vs. SGOV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RNGR vs. SGOV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ranger Energy Services, Inc. (RNGR) and iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RNGR achieves a 12.48% return, which is significantly higher than SGOV's 1.70% return.


RNGR

1D
2.16%
1M
-3.70%
YTD
12.48%
6M
14.28%
1Y
26.39%
3Y*
19.04%
5Y*
14.09%
10Y*

SGOV

1D
0.01%
1M
0.27%
YTD
1.70%
6M
1.80%
1Y
3.93%
3Y*
4.68%
5Y*
3.58%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RNGR vs. SGOV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
RNGR
Ranger Energy Services, Inc.
12.48%-7.94%53.89%-6.26%7.21%182.14%-2.93%
SGOV
iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF
1.70%4.24%5.27%5.12%1.58%0.04%0.04%

Correlation

The correlation between RNGR and SGOV is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2020

-0.03

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RNGR vs. SGOV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RNGR
RNGR Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
RNGR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RNGR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
RNGR Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
RNGR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
RNGR Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

SGOV
SGOV Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
SGOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGOV Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
SGOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGOV Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RNGR vs. SGOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ranger Energy Services, Inc. (RNGR) and iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RNGRSGOVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-19.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-273.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

194.55

-193.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.52

396.11

-394.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.48

4,438.60

-4,435.12

RNGR vs. SGOV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RNGR Sharpe Ratio is 0.68, which is lower than the SGOV Sharpe Ratio of 20.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RNGR and SGOV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RNGR vs. SGOV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RNGR drawdown since its inception was -85.16%, which is greater than SGOV's maximum drawdown of -0.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RNGR and SGOV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RNGRSGOVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.16%

-0.03%

-85.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.48%

-0.01%

-17.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-40.52%

-0.01%

-40.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.52%

-0.03%

-40.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.98%

0.00%

-14.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-39.22%

-0.00%

-39.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.62%

0.00%

+7.62%

Volatility

RNGR vs. SGOV - Volatility Comparison

Ranger Energy Services, Inc. (RNGR) has a higher volatility of 12.15% compared to iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV) at 0.06%. This indicates that RNGR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SGOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RNGRSGOVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.15%

0.06%

+12.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.13%

0.13%

+25.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.33%

0.19%

+39.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.11%

0.24%

+43.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

55.13%

0.24%

+54.89%

Dividends

RNGR vs. SGOV - Dividend Comparison

RNGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.54%, less than SGOV's 3.85% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
RNGR
Ranger Energy Services, Inc.
1.54%1.72%1.29%0.98%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SGOV
iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF
3.85%4.10%5.10%4.87%1.45%0.03%0.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


RNGR and SGOV have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RNGR has higher volatility (12.15%) compared to SGOV (0.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RNGR dropped -85.16% vs SGOV's -0.03%.

SGOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (20.38 vs 0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RNGR and SGOV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer