RNGR vs. CVX
RNGR (Ranger Energy Services, Inc.) and CVX (Chevron Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Energy sector — RNGR in Oil & Gas Equipment & Services, CVX in Oil & Gas Integrated. Over the past 5 years, RNGR returned 16.13%/yr vs 16.52%/yr for CVX. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RNGR vs. CVX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RNGR achieves a 15.07% return, which is significantly lower than CVX's 26.84% return.
RNGR
- 1D
- -1.30%
- 1M
- -6.03%
- YTD
- 15.07%
- 6M
- 14.91%
- 1Y
- 45.27%
- 3Y*
- 13.43%
- 5Y*
- 16.13%
- 10Y*
- —
CVX
- 1D
- 1.15%
- 1M
- -0.43%
- YTD
- 26.84%
- 6M
- 27.53%
- 1Y
- 41.64%
- 3Y*
- 11.27%
- 5Y*
- 16.52%
- 10Y*
- 11.15%
RNGR vs. CVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RNGR Ranger Energy Services, Inc. | 15.07% | -7.94% | 53.89% | -6.26% | 7.21% | 182.14% | -43.48% | 24.56% | -43.99% | -35.09% |
CVX Chevron Corporation | 26.84% | 10.10% | 1.29% | -13.63% | 58.46% | 46.24% | -25.95% | 15.27% | -9.75% | 16.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between RNGR and CVX is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 14, 2017 | 0.28 |
The correlation between RNGR and CVX shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (all time) to 0.49 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
RNGR:
$383.87M
CVX:
$376.75B
RNGR:
$0.64
CVX:
$5.75
RNGR:
24.84
CVX:
32.97
RNGR:
3.55
CVX:
3.21
RNGR:
0.64
CVX:
1.95
RNGR:
1.28
CVX:
2.05
RNGR:
$570.80M
CVX:
$185.89B
RNGR:
$34.80M
CVX:
$47.27B
RNGR:
$74.50M
CVX:
$40.44B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RNGR vs. CVX — Risk / Return Rank
RNGR
CVX
RNGR vs. CVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ranger Energy Services, Inc. (RNGR) and Chevron Corporation (CVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RNGR | CVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.32 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.60 | 2.99 | -0.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.40 | 7.70 | -1.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RNGR | CVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.17 | 1.90 | -0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | 0.66 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.38 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.04 | 0.38 | -0.34 |
Drawdowns
RNGR vs. CVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RNGR drawdown since its inception was -85.16%, which is greater than CVX's maximum drawdown of -55.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RNGR and CVX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RNGR | CVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.16% | -55.77% | -29.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.48% | -13.99% | -3.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -40.52% | -20.64% | -19.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.52% | -24.95% | -15.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -55.77% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.02% | -9.33% | -3.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -39.37% | -11.39% | -27.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.09% | 5.42% | +1.67% |
Volatility
RNGR vs. CVX - Volatility Comparison
Ranger Energy Services, Inc. (RNGR) has a higher volatility of 10.27% compared to Chevron Corporation (CVX) at 8.29%. This indicates that RNGR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RNGR | CVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.27% | 8.29% | +1.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.48% | 17.82% | +6.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.94% | 22.10% | +16.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.20% | 25.12% | +19.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 55.21% | 29.16% | +26.05% |
Dividends
RNGR vs. CVX - Dividend Comparison
RNGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%, less than CVX's 3.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVX Chevron Corporation | 3.68% | 4.49% | 4.50% | 4.05% | 3.16% | 4.52% | 6.11% | 3.95% | 4.12% | 3.45% | 3.64% | 4.76% |
RNGR Ranger Energy Services, Inc. | 1.50% | 1.72% | 1.29% | 0.98% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
RNGR vs. CVX - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ranger Energy Services, Inc. and Chevron Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
RNGR vs. CVX - Profitability Comparison
RNGR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ranger Energy Services, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 159.10M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
CVX - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Chevron Corporation reported a gross profit of 4.55B and revenue of 47.56B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 9.6%.
RNGR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ranger Energy Services, Inc. reported an operating income of 5.10M and revenue of 159.10M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.2%.
CVX - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Chevron Corporation reported an operating income of 3.24B and revenue of 47.56B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.8%.
RNGR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ranger Energy Services, Inc. reported a net income of 3.00M and revenue of 159.10M, resulting in a net margin of 1.9%.
CVX - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Chevron Corporation reported a net income of 2.21B and revenue of 47.56B, resulting in a net margin of 4.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
RNGR and CVX have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RNGR has higher volatility (10.27%) compared to CVX (8.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RNGR dropped -85.16% vs CVX's -55.77%.
CVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RNGR and CVX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer