RNGR vs. MUSA
RNGR (Ranger Energy Services, Inc.) and MUSA (Murphy USA Inc.) are both stocks. RNGR operates in Oil & Gas Equipment & Services (Energy), while MUSA operates in Specialty Retail (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 5 years, RNGR returned 16.00%/yr vs 33.41%/yr for MUSA. Their 0.08 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
RNGR vs. MUSA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RNGR achieves a 15.65% return, which is significantly lower than MUSA's 51.03% return.
RNGR
- 1D
- 3.35%
- 1M
- 4.09%
- 6M
- 4.85%
- YTD
- 15.65%
- 1Y
- 28.32%
- 3Y*
- 17.29%
- 5Y*
- 16.00%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 2.13%
MUSA
- 1D
- -1.35%
- 1M
- 8.38%
- 6M
- 44.24%
- YTD
- 51.03%
- 1Y
- 68.79%
- 3Y*
- 26.68%
- 5Y*
- 33.41%
- 10Y*
- 23.74%
- ALL TIME*
- 24.17%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
MUSA Murphy USA Inc. | $157.53M | $157.15M | $171.96M |
| $3.55M | $3.42M | $3.44M |
RNGR vs. MUSA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RNGR Ranger Energy Services, Inc. | 15.65% | -7.94% | 53.89% | -6.26% | 7.21% | 182.14% | -43.48% | 24.56% | -43.99% | -34.07% |
MUSA Murphy USA Inc. | 51.03% | -19.15% | 41.27% | 28.20% | 41.02% | 53.33% | 12.06% | 52.66% | -4.63% | 17.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between RNGR and MUSA is 0.04, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 11, 2017 | 0.08 |
Fundamentals
RNGR:
$375.60M
MUSA:
$11.23B
RNGR:
$0.61
MUSA:
$29.26
RNGR:
26.19
MUSA:
20.77
RNGR:
3.74
MUSA:
1.13
RNGR:
0.62
MUSA:
0.58
RNGR:
1.27
MUSA:
17.26
RNGR:
$606.70M
MUSA:
$19.68B
RNGR:
$20.10M
MUSA:
$487.10M
RNGR:
$80.60M
MUSA:
$1.06B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RNGR vs. MUSA — Risk / Return Rank
RNGR
MUSA
RNGR vs. MUSA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ranger Energy Services, Inc. (RNGR) and Murphy USA Inc. (MUSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RNGR | MUSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.33 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.05 | 3.50 | -2.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.74 | 10.30 | -7.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RNGR vs. MUSA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RNGR drawdown since its inception was -85.16%, which is greater than MUSA's maximum drawdown of -35.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RNGR and MUSA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RNGR | MUSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.16% | -35.54% | -49.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.86% | -19.72% | -1.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -40.52% | -35.54% | -4.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.52% | -35.54% | -4.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.54% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.58% | -2.41% | -10.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.92% | -9.93% | -28.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.06% | 6.69% | +1.37% |
Volatility
RNGR vs. MUSA - Volatility Comparison
Ranger Energy Services, Inc. (RNGR) has a higher volatility of 11.86% compared to Murphy USA Inc. (MUSA) at 9.95%. This indicates that RNGR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MUSA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RNGR | MUSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.86% | 9.95% | +1.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.24% | 32.19% | -6.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.33% | 39.90% | -3.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.93% | 30.88% | +10.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 54.94% | 31.59% | +23.35% |
Dividends
RNGR vs. MUSA - Dividend Comparison
RNGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%, more than MUSA's 0.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MUSA Murphy USA Inc. | 0.40% | 0.53% | 0.36% | 0.43% | 0.45% | 0.52% | 0.19% |
RNGR Ranger Energy Services, Inc. | 1.50% | 1.72% | 1.29% | 0.98% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
RNGR vs. MUSA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ranger Energy Services, Inc. and Murphy USA Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
RNGR vs. MUSA - Profitability Comparison
RNGR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ranger Energy Services, Inc. reported a gross profit of -12.30M and revenue of 176.50M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -7.0%.
MUSA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Murphy USA Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 4.82B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
RNGR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ranger Energy Services, Inc. reported an operating income of 12.40M and revenue of 176.50M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.0%.
MUSA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Murphy USA Inc. reported an operating income of 205.20M and revenue of 4.82B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.3%.
RNGR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ranger Energy Services, Inc. reported a net income of 6.90M and revenue of 176.50M, resulting in a net margin of 3.9%.
MUSA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Murphy USA Inc. reported a net income of 136.30M and revenue of 4.82B, resulting in a net margin of 2.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
RNGR and MUSA have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RNGR has higher volatility (11.86%) compared to MUSA (9.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RNGR dropped -85.16% vs MUSA's -35.54%.
MUSA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RNGR and MUSA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer