HRTG vs. CBT
HRTG (Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc.) and CBT (Cabot Corporation) are both stocks. HRTG operates in Insurance - Property & Casualty (Financial Services), while CBT operates in Specialty Chemicals (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, HRTG returned 6.09%/yr vs 8.91%/yr for CBT. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
HRTG vs. CBT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HRTG achieves a -28.64% return, which is significantly lower than CBT's 30.12% return. Over the past 10 years, HRTG has underperformed CBT with an annualized return of 6.09%, while CBT has yielded a comparatively higher 8.91% annualized return.
HRTG
- 1D
- -1.51%
- 1M
- -26.56%
- YTD
- -28.64%
- 6M
- -25.83%
- 1Y
- -15.16%
- 3Y*
- 63.24%
- 5Y*
- 21.38%
- 10Y*
- 6.09%
CBT
- 1D
- -2.33%
- 1M
- 13.03%
- YTD
- 30.12%
- 6M
- 33.63%
- 1Y
- 16.02%
- 3Y*
- 6.74%
- 5Y*
- 7.91%
- 10Y*
- 8.91%
HRTG vs. CBT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HRTG Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. | -28.64% | 141.82% | 85.58% | 262.22% | -68.58% | -40.09% | -21.80% | -8.50% | -17.06% | 16.94% |
CBT Cabot Corporation | 30.12% | -25.68% | 11.25% | 27.63% | 21.38% | 28.40% | -2.16% | 14.25% | -28.70% | 24.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between HRTG and CBT is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2014 | 0.25 |
The correlation between HRTG and CBT shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (1 year) to 0.26 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
HRTG:
$6.53
CBT:
$5.83
HRTG:
3.20
CBT:
14.63
HRTG:
0.02
CBT:
0.79
HRTG:
0.76
CBT:
1.26
HRTG:
$848.47M
CBT:
$3.61B
HRTG:
$333.64M
CBT:
$916.00M
HRTG:
$285.21M
CBT:
$773.00M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HRTG vs. CBT — Risk / Return Rank
HRTG
CBT
HRTG vs. CBT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. (HRTG) and Cabot Corporation (CBT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HRTG | CBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.27 | 0.50 | -0.77 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.00 | 1.01 | -1.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.12 | -0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.46 | 0.56 | -1.02 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.07 | 1.33 | -2.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HRTG | CBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.27 | 0.50 | -0.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 | 0.24 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.11 | 0.25 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | 0.22 | -0.10 |
Drawdowns
HRTG vs. CBT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HRTG drawdown since its inception was -94.36%, which is greater than CBT's maximum drawdown of -82.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HRTG and CBT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HRTG | CBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.36% | -82.87% | -11.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.95% | -28.82% | -4.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -43.90% | -48.78% | +4.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -84.89% | -48.78% | -36.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -92.21% | -67.20% | -25.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.95% | -24.23% | -8.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.56% | -20.82% | -25.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.24% | 12.03% | +2.21% |
Volatility
HRTG vs. CBT - Volatility Comparison
Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. (HRTG) has a higher volatility of 24.24% compared to Cabot Corporation (CBT) at 12.07%. This indicates that HRTG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CBT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HRTG | CBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.24% | 12.07% | +12.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.86% | 22.35% | +15.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 57.28% | 31.96% | +25.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 71.34% | 33.55% | +37.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 57.92% | 35.33% | +22.59% |
Dividends
HRTG vs. CBT - Dividend Comparison
HRTG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CBT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.14%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBT Cabot Corporation | 2.14% | 2.69% | 1.85% | 1.88% | 2.21% | 2.53% | 3.12% | 2.90% | 3.04% | 2.02% | 2.22% | 2.15% |
HRTG Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 6.67% | 4.08% | 2.37% | 1.81% | 1.63% | 1.33% | 1.47% | 0.23% |
Financials
HRTG vs. CBT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. and Cabot Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
HRTG vs. CBT - Profitability Comparison
HRTG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 212.66M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
CBT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cabot Corporation reported a gross profit of 211.00M and revenue of 849.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.9%.
HRTG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 50.82M and revenue of 212.66M, resulting in an operating margin of 23.9%.
CBT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cabot Corporation reported an operating income of 129.00M and revenue of 849.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 15.2%.
HRTG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 36.48M and revenue of 212.66M, resulting in a net margin of 17.2%.
CBT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cabot Corporation reported a net income of 73.00M and revenue of 849.00M, resulting in a net margin of 8.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
HRTG and CBT have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HRTG has higher volatility (24.24%) compared to CBT (12.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HRTG dropped -94.36% vs CBT's -82.87%.
CBT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.50 vs -0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HRTG and CBT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer