PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
HRTG vs. CBT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


HRTGCBT
YTD Return139.42%30.36%
1Y Return198.47%56.47%
3Y Return (Ann)37.50%31.95%
5Y Return (Ann)2.86%21.84%
10Y Return (Ann)2.42%9.74%
Sharpe Ratio2.661.76
Daily Std Dev74.68%32.71%
Max Drawdown-94.36%-82.87%
Current Drawdown-33.32%0.00%

Fundamentals


HRTGCBT
Market Cap$478.98M$5.89B
EPS$1.96$8.38
PE Ratio7.9612.82
PEG Ratio0.001.83
Total Revenue (TTM)$770.38M$3.96B
Gross Profit (TTM)$768.14M$946.00M
EBITDA (TTM)-$20.81M$744.00M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between HRTG and CBT is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

HRTG vs. CBT - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, HRTG achieves a 139.42% return, which is significantly higher than CBT's 30.36% return. Over the past 10 years, HRTG has underperformed CBT with an annualized return of 2.42%, while CBT has yielded a comparatively higher 9.74% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-40.00%-20.00%0.00%20.00%40.00%60.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
58.64%
19.92%
HRTG
CBT

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

HRTG vs. CBT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. (HRTG) and Cabot Corporation (CBT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HRTG
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for HRTG, currently valued at 2.66, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.002.66
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for HRTG, currently valued at 3.27, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.003.27
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for HRTG, currently valued at 1.42, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.42
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for HRTG, currently valued at 2.53, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.002.53
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for HRTG, currently valued at 8.36, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.008.36
CBT
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CBT, currently valued at 1.76, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.001.76
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CBT, currently valued at 2.80, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.80
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CBT, currently valued at 1.34, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.34
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CBT, currently valued at 2.79, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.002.79
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CBT, currently valued at 9.59, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.009.59

HRTG vs. CBT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HRTG Sharpe Ratio is 2.66, which is higher than the CBT Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of HRTG and CBT.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.002.503.003.504.00AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
2.66
1.76
HRTG
CBT

Dividends

HRTG vs. CBT - Dividend Comparison

HRTG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CBT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
HRTG
Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc.
0.00%0.00%6.67%4.08%2.37%1.81%1.63%1.33%1.47%0.23%0.00%0.00%
CBT
Cabot Corporation
1.55%1.88%2.21%2.53%3.12%2.90%3.04%2.02%2.22%2.68%1.96%1.56%

Drawdowns

HRTG vs. CBT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HRTG drawdown since its inception was -94.36%, which is greater than CBT's maximum drawdown of -82.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HRTG and CBT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
-33.32%
0
HRTG
CBT

Volatility

HRTG vs. CBT - Volatility Comparison

Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. (HRTG) has a higher volatility of 15.23% compared to Cabot Corporation (CBT) at 7.24%. This indicates that HRTG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CBT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
15.23%
7.24%
HRTG
CBT

Financials

HRTG vs. CBT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. and Cabot Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items