RMQHX vs. GILHX
Compare and contrast key facts about Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H (RMQHX) and Guggenheim Limited Duration Fund (GILHX).
RMQHX is a passively managed fund by Guggenheim that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100. It was launched on Nov 28, 2014. GILHX is managed by Guggenheim. It was launched on Dec 16, 2013.
Performance
RMQHX vs. GILHX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RMQHX vs. GILHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RMQHX Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H | -12.99% | 33.90% | 44.74% | 115.89% | -59.96% | 56.33% | 101.06% | 80.70% | -7.28% | 69.79% |
GILHX Guggenheim Limited Duration Fund | -0.01% | 6.02% | 6.00% | 7.28% | -4.90% | 0.00% | 6.51% | 2.21% | 1.66% | 2.91% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RMQHX achieves a -12.99% return, which is significantly lower than GILHX's -0.01% return. Over the past 10 years, RMQHX has outperformed GILHX with an annualized return of 31.05%, while GILHX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.12% annualized return.
RMQHX
- 1D
- 7.46%
- 1M
- -10.36%
- YTD
- -12.99%
- 6M
- -11.17%
- 1Y
- 39.17%
- 3Y*
- 37.08%
- 5Y*
- 16.36%
- 10Y*
- 31.05%
GILHX
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -0.65%
- YTD
- -0.01%
- 6M
- 1.21%
- 1Y
- 4.22%
- 3Y*
- 5.61%
- 5Y*
- 2.91%
- 10Y*
- 3.12%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RMQHX vs. GILHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RMQHX has a 1.27% expense ratio, which is higher than GILHX's 0.49% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RMQHX vs. GILHX — Risk / Return Rank
RMQHX
GILHX
RMQHX vs. GILHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H (RMQHX) and Guggenheim Limited Duration Fund (GILHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RMQHX | GILHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.87 | 2.32 | -1.45 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.54 | 4.37 | -2.84 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.56 | -0.34 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.64 | 4.26 | -2.62 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.65 | 16.90 | -11.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RMQHX | GILHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 | 2.32 | -1.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | 1.33 | -0.97 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 | 1.71 | -1.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 1.67 | -1.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between RMQHX and GILHX is 0.06, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
RMQHX vs. GILHX - Dividend Comparison
RMQHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 39.96%, more than GILHX's 4.15% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RMQHX Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H | 39.96% | 34.77% | 25.22% | 3.66% | 0.00% | 2.13% | 5.17% | 0.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GILHX Guggenheim Limited Duration Fund | 4.15% | 4.43% | 4.38% | 4.31% | 2.05% | 1.79% | 2.25% | 2.31% | 2.35% | 2.39% | 3.07% | 3.54% |
Drawdowns
RMQHX vs. GILHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RMQHX drawdown since its inception was -63.21%, which is greater than GILHX's maximum drawdown of -8.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMQHX and GILHX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RMQHX | GILHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.21% | -8.10% | -55.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.11% | -1.13% | -23.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.21% | -8.10% | -55.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.21% | -8.10% | -55.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.37% | -0.81% | -18.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.01% | -0.71% | -12.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.31% | 0.29% | +7.02% |
Volatility
RMQHX vs. GILHX - Volatility Comparison
Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H (RMQHX) has a higher volatility of 13.71% compared to Guggenheim Limited Duration Fund (GILHX) at 0.54%. This indicates that RMQHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GILHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RMQHX | GILHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.71% | 0.54% | +13.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.24% | 1.18% | +25.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.80% | 1.91% | +45.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.30% | 2.20% | +44.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.36% | 1.83% | +44.53% |