GILHX vs. NMUIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Guggenheim Limited Duration Fund (GILHX) and Neuberger Berman Municipal Intermediate Bond Fund (NMUIX).
GILHX is managed by Guggenheim. It was launched on Dec 16, 2013. NMUIX is managed by Neuberger Berman. It was launched on Jul 8, 1987.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GILHX or NMUIX.
Correlation
The correlation between GILHX and NMUIX is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
GILHX vs. NMUIX - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
GILHX:
3.28
NMUIX:
0.90
GILHX:
6.13
NMUIX:
1.26
GILHX:
1.80
NMUIX:
1.19
GILHX:
7.45
NMUIX:
0.36
GILHX:
21.21
NMUIX:
2.71
GILHX:
0.30%
NMUIX:
0.95%
GILHX:
1.94%
NMUIX:
2.88%
GILHX:
-7.82%
NMUIX:
-13.92%
GILHX:
-0.08%
NMUIX:
-3.38%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GILHX achieves a 0.57% return, which is significantly higher than NMUIX's 0.50% return. Over the past 10 years, GILHX has outperformed NMUIX with an annualized return of 2.82%, while NMUIX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.39% annualized return.
GILHX
0.57%
0.53%
2.18%
6.41%
2.90%
2.82%
NMUIX
0.50%
0.78%
0.76%
2.59%
-0.01%
1.39%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GILHX vs. NMUIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GILHX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than NMUIX's 0.45% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GILHX vs. NMUIX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
GILHX
NMUIX
GILHX vs. NMUIX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guggenheim Limited Duration Fund (GILHX) and Neuberger Berman Municipal Intermediate Bond Fund (NMUIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GILHX vs. NMUIX - Dividend Comparison
GILHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.40%, more than NMUIX's 2.73% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GILHX Guggenheim Limited Duration Fund | 4.40% | 4.39% | 4.31% | 2.67% | 1.69% | 1.97% | 2.51% | 2.41% | 2.55% | 3.05% | 3.54% | 1.93% |
NMUIX Neuberger Berman Municipal Intermediate Bond Fund | 2.73% | 2.72% | 2.45% | 2.11% | 1.78% | 1.95% | 2.44% | 2.39% | 1.98% | 1.98% | 2.21% | 2.25% |
Drawdowns
GILHX vs. NMUIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GILHX drawdown since its inception was -7.82%, smaller than the maximum NMUIX drawdown of -13.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GILHX and NMUIX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GILHX vs. NMUIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Guggenheim Limited Duration Fund (GILHX) is 0.48%, while Neuberger Berman Municipal Intermediate Bond Fund (NMUIX) has a volatility of 0.80%. This indicates that GILHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NMUIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.