PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GILHX vs. BSIIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GILHX vs. BSIIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Guggenheim Limited Duration Fund (GILHX) and BlackRock Strategic Income Opportunities Fund Class I (BSIIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GILHX achieves a 0.98% return, which is significantly lower than BSIIX's 1.68% return. Over the past 10 years, GILHX has underperformed BSIIX with an annualized return of 3.09%, while BSIIX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.82% annualized return.


GILHX

1D
-0.08%
1M
0.11%
YTD
0.98%
6M
1.47%
1Y
4.69%
3Y*
5.84%
5Y*
3.00%
10Y*
3.09%

BSIIX

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.92%
YTD
1.68%
6M
2.26%
1Y
6.95%
3Y*
6.77%
5Y*
2.88%
10Y*
3.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GILHX vs. BSIIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GILHX
Guggenheim Limited Duration Fund
0.98%6.02%6.00%7.28%-4.90%0.00%6.51%2.21%1.66%2.91%
BSIIX
BlackRock Strategic Income Opportunities Fund Class I
1.68%8.59%5.22%6.18%-6.14%0.80%7.22%7.65%-0.42%4.89%

Correlation

The correlation between GILHX and BSIIX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014

0.60

The correlation between GILHX and BSIIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (all time) to 0.84 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GILHX vs. BSIIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GILHX
GILHX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
GILHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GILHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
GILHX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
GILHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
GILHX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

BSIIX
BSIIX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
BSIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
BSIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GILHX vs. BSIIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guggenheim Limited Duration Fund (GILHX) and BlackRock Strategic Income Opportunities Fund Class I (BSIIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GILHXBSIIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.50

2.40

+0.10

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

5.17

3.80

+1.38

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.63

1.51

+0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.62

2.64

+1.98

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

20.47

10.22

+10.24

GILHX vs. BSIIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GILHX Sharpe Ratio is 2.50, which is comparable to the BSIIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GILHX and BSIIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GILHXBSIIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.50

2.40

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.35

0.80

+0.55

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.68

1.22

+0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.68

1.31

+0.37

Drawdowns

GILHX vs. BSIIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GILHX drawdown since its inception was -8.10%, smaller than the maximum BSIIX drawdown of -18.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GILHX and BSIIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GILHXBSIIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.10%

-18.76%

+10.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.13%

-2.84%

+1.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.13%

-2.84%

+1.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-8.10%

-9.13%

+1.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-8.10%

-9.91%

+1.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.08%

-0.10%

+0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.70%

-1.81%

+1.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.26%

0.73%

-0.47%

Volatility

GILHX vs. BSIIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Guggenheim Limited Duration Fund (GILHX) is 0.60%, while BlackRock Strategic Income Opportunities Fund Class I (BSIIX) has a volatility of 1.04%. This indicates that GILHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BSIIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GILHXBSIIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.60%

1.04%

-0.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.36%

2.34%

-0.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.88%

2.92%

-1.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.23%

3.64%

-1.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.85%

3.14%

-1.29%

GILHX vs. BSIIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GILHX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than BSIIX's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

GILHX vs. BSIIX - Dividend Comparison

GILHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.56%, less than BSIIX's 5.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BSIIX
BlackRock Strategic Income Opportunities Fund Class I
5.16%5.07%4.75%3.33%3.58%2.98%2.92%3.54%3.32%3.45%2.91%3.19%
GILHX
Guggenheim Limited Duration Fund
4.56%4.43%4.38%4.31%2.05%1.79%2.25%2.31%2.35%2.39%3.07%3.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


GILHX and BSIIX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BSIIX has higher volatility (1.04%) compared to GILHX (0.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GILHX dropped -8.10% vs BSIIX's -18.76%.

GILHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 2.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GILHX and BSIIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer