GILHX vs. GIFIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Guggenheim Limited Duration Fund (GILHX) and Guggenheim Floating Rate Strategies Fund (GIFIX).
GILHX is managed by Guggenheim. It was launched on Dec 16, 2013. GIFIX is an actively managed fund by Guggenheim. It was launched on Nov 29, 2011.
Performance
GILHX vs. GIFIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GILHX vs. GIFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GILHX Guggenheim Limited Duration Fund | -0.13% | 6.02% | 6.00% | 7.28% | -4.90% | 0.00% | 6.51% | 2.21% | 1.66% | 2.91% |
GIFIX Guggenheim Floating Rate Strategies Fund | -1.13% | 4.13% | 7.22% | 13.03% | -2.05% | 4.55% | 1.36% | 6.69% | -0.14% | 3.63% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GILHX achieves a -0.13% return, which is significantly higher than GIFIX's -1.13% return. Over the past 10 years, GILHX has underperformed GIFIX with an annualized return of 3.11%, while GIFIX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.28% annualized return.
GILHX
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -0.93%
- YTD
- -0.13%
- 6M
- 1.21%
- 1Y
- 4.18%
- 3Y*
- 5.57%
- 5Y*
- 2.90%
- 10Y*
- 3.11%
GIFIX
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- -0.22%
- YTD
- -1.13%
- 6M
- -0.20%
- 1Y
- 2.65%
- 3Y*
- 6.43%
- 5Y*
- 4.79%
- 10Y*
- 4.28%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GILHX vs. GIFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GILHX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than GIFIX's 0.78% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GILHX vs. GIFIX — Risk / Return Rank
GILHX
GIFIX
GILHX vs. GIFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guggenheim Limited Duration Fund (GILHX) and Guggenheim Floating Rate Strategies Fund (GIFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GILHX | GIFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.41 | 1.17 | +1.25 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.62 | 2.08 | +2.54 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.59 | 1.34 | +0.25 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.15 | 1.49 | +2.66 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.72 | 5.34 | +11.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GILHX | GIFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.41 | 1.17 | +1.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.33 | 1.81 | -0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.71 | 1.29 | +0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.66 | 1.58 | +0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between GILHX and GIFIX is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
GILHX vs. GIFIX - Dividend Comparison
GILHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.15%, less than GIFIX's 6.71% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GILHX Guggenheim Limited Duration Fund | 4.15% | 4.43% | 4.38% | 4.31% | 2.05% | 1.79% | 2.25% | 2.31% | 2.35% | 2.39% | 3.07% | 3.54% |
GIFIX Guggenheim Floating Rate Strategies Fund | 6.71% | 7.40% | 8.47% | 8.34% | 3.64% | 2.91% | 3.78% | 4.38% | 4.71% | 3.83% | 4.10% | 4.85% |
Drawdowns
GILHX vs. GIFIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GILHX drawdown since its inception was -8.10%, smaller than the maximum GIFIX drawdown of -19.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GILHX and GIFIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GILHX | GIFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.10% | -19.03% | +10.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.13% | -1.97% | +0.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -8.10% | -6.30% | -1.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -8.10% | -19.03% | +10.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.93% | -1.26% | +0.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.71% | -0.76% | +0.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.28% | 0.56% | -0.28% |
Volatility
GILHX vs. GIFIX - Volatility Comparison
Guggenheim Limited Duration Fund (GILHX) and Guggenheim Floating Rate Strategies Fund (GIFIX) have volatilities of 0.53% and 0.53%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GILHX | GIFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.53% | 0.53% | 0.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.18% | 1.61% | -0.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.91% | 2.67% | -0.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.20% | 2.67% | -0.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.83% | 3.34% | -1.51% |