RMQHX vs. TEPIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H (RMQHX) and ProFunds Technology UltraSector Fund (TEPIX).
RMQHX is a passively managed fund by Guggenheim that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100. It was launched on Nov 28, 2014. TEPIX is managed by ProFunds. It was launched on Jun 18, 2000.
Performance
RMQHX vs. TEPIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RMQHX vs. TEPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RMQHX Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H | -12.99% | 33.90% | 44.74% | 115.89% | -59.96% | 56.33% | 101.06% | 80.70% | -7.28% | 69.79% |
TEPIX ProFunds Technology UltraSector Fund | -12.41% | 30.08% | 14.17% | 91.81% | -51.01% | 46.85% | 64.53% | 71.30% | -5.89% | 49.17% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with RMQHX having a -12.99% return and TEPIX slightly higher at -12.41%. Over the past 10 years, RMQHX has outperformed TEPIX with an annualized return of 31.05%, while TEPIX has yielded a comparatively lower 23.33% annualized return.
RMQHX
- 1D
- 7.46%
- 1M
- -10.36%
- YTD
- -12.99%
- 6M
- -11.17%
- 1Y
- 39.17%
- 3Y*
- 37.08%
- 5Y*
- 16.36%
- 10Y*
- 31.05%
TEPIX
- 1D
- 6.36%
- 1M
- -7.34%
- YTD
- -12.41%
- 6M
- -11.70%
- 1Y
- 36.64%
- 3Y*
- 21.96%
- 5Y*
- 10.76%
- 10Y*
- 23.33%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RMQHX vs. TEPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RMQHX has a 1.27% expense ratio, which is lower than TEPIX's 1.48% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RMQHX vs. TEPIX — Risk / Return Rank
RMQHX
TEPIX
RMQHX vs. TEPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H (RMQHX) and ProFunds Technology UltraSector Fund (TEPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RMQHX | TEPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.87 | 0.94 | -0.07 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.54 | 1.52 | +0.02 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.21 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.64 | 1.55 | +0.09 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.65 | 4.82 | +0.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RMQHX | TEPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 | 0.94 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | 0.07 | +0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 | 0.22 | +0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.12 | +0.53 |
Correlation
The correlation between RMQHX and TEPIX is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
RMQHX vs. TEPIX - Dividend Comparison
RMQHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 39.96%, more than TEPIX's 3.68% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RMQHX Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H | 39.96% | 34.77% | 25.22% | 3.66% | 0.00% | 2.13% | 5.17% | 0.10% | 0.00% |
TEPIX ProFunds Technology UltraSector Fund | 3.68% | 3.22% | 0.00% | 0.37% | 0.00% | 0.90% | 2.31% | 0.00% | 0.23% |
Drawdowns
RMQHX vs. TEPIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RMQHX drawdown since its inception was -63.21%, smaller than the maximum TEPIX drawdown of -89.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMQHX and TEPIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RMQHX | TEPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.21% | -89.14% | +25.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.11% | -24.64% | -0.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.21% | -84.97% | +21.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.21% | -84.97% | +21.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.37% | -74.27% | +54.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.01% | -49.68% | +36.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.31% | 7.94% | -0.63% |
Volatility
RMQHX vs. TEPIX - Volatility Comparison
Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H (RMQHX) has a higher volatility of 13.71% compared to ProFunds Technology UltraSector Fund (TEPIX) at 12.13%. This indicates that RMQHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TEPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RMQHX | TEPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.71% | 12.13% | +1.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.24% | 24.81% | +1.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.80% | 40.73% | +7.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.30% | 145.06% | -98.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.36% | 105.42% | -59.06% |