PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RMQHX vs. TEPIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RMQHX vs. TEPIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H (RMQHX) and ProFunds Technology UltraSector Fund (TEPIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RMQHX achieves a 40.14% return, which is significantly lower than TEPIX's 57.79% return. Over the past 10 years, RMQHX has outperformed TEPIX with an annualized return of 37.59%, while TEPIX has yielded a comparatively lower 31.22% annualized return.


RMQHX

1D
0.94%
1M
21.45%
YTD
40.14%
6M
35.68%
1Y
83.42%
3Y*
51.16%
5Y*
27.31%
10Y*
37.59%

TEPIX

1D
1.85%
1M
34.64%
YTD
57.79%
6M
56.06%
1Y
107.82%
3Y*
41.60%
5Y*
23.82%
10Y*
31.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RMQHX vs. TEPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RMQHX
Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H
40.14%33.90%44.74%115.89%-59.96%56.33%101.06%80.70%-7.28%69.79%
TEPIX
ProFunds Technology UltraSector Fund
57.79%30.08%14.17%91.81%-51.01%46.85%64.53%71.30%-5.89%49.17%

Correlation

The correlation between RMQHX and TEPIX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2015

0.96

The correlation between RMQHX and TEPIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RMQHX vs. TEPIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RMQHX
RMQHX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
RMQHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RMQHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
RMQHX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
RMQHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
RMQHX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

TEPIX
TEPIX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
TEPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TEPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
TEPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
TEPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
TEPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RMQHX vs. TEPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H (RMQHX) and ProFunds Technology UltraSector Fund (TEPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RMQHXTEPIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.70

3.60

-0.90

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.16

3.91

-0.75

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.52

-0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.48

4.59

-1.11

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.56

14.58

-2.02

RMQHX vs. TEPIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RMQHX Sharpe Ratio is 2.70, which is comparable to the TEPIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RMQHX and TEPIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RMQHXTEPIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.70

3.60

-0.90

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.17

+0.43

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

0.30

+0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.76

0.15

+0.61

Drawdowns

RMQHX vs. TEPIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RMQHX drawdown since its inception was -63.21%, smaller than the maximum TEPIX drawdown of -89.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMQHX and TEPIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RMQHXTEPIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.21%

-89.14%

+25.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.97%

-24.64%

-0.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.46%

-84.97%

+42.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.21%

-84.97%

+21.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.21%

-84.97%

+21.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-53.64%

+53.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.87%

-49.79%

+36.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.89%

7.73%

-0.84%

Volatility

RMQHX vs. TEPIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H (RMQHX) is 8.58%, while ProFunds Technology UltraSector Fund (TEPIX) has a volatility of 10.15%. This indicates that RMQHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TEPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RMQHXTEPIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.58%

10.15%

-1.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.32%

25.07%

-0.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.15%

31.37%

+0.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

46.22%

145.10%

-98.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.44%

105.51%

-59.07%

RMQHX vs. TEPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RMQHX has a 1.27% expense ratio, which is lower than TEPIX's 1.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

RMQHX vs. TEPIX - Dividend Comparison

RMQHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 24.81%, more than TEPIX's 2.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
RMQHX
Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H
24.81%34.77%25.22%3.66%0.00%2.13%5.17%0.10%0.00%
TEPIX
ProFunds Technology UltraSector Fund
2.04%3.22%0.00%0.37%0.00%0.90%2.31%0.00%0.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, RMQHX and TEPIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TEPIX has higher volatility (10.15%) compared to RMQHX (8.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RMQHX dropped -63.21% vs TEPIX's -89.14%.

TEPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.60 vs 2.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RMQHX and TEPIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer