GILHX vs. BND
Compare and contrast key facts about Guggenheim Limited Duration Fund (GILHX) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND).
GILHX is managed by Guggenheim. It was launched on Dec 16, 2013. BND is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index. It was launched on Apr 3, 2007.
Performance
GILHX vs. BND - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GILHX vs. BND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GILHX Guggenheim Limited Duration Fund | -0.01% | 6.02% | 6.00% | 7.28% | -4.90% | 0.00% | 6.51% | 2.21% | 1.66% | 2.91% |
BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF | 0.09% | 7.08% | 1.38% | 5.65% | -13.11% | -1.86% | 7.71% | 8.84% | -0.12% | 3.57% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GILHX achieves a -0.01% return, which is significantly lower than BND's 0.09% return. Over the past 10 years, GILHX has outperformed BND with an annualized return of 3.12%, while BND has yielded a comparatively lower 1.68% annualized return.
GILHX
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -0.65%
- YTD
- -0.01%
- 6M
- 1.21%
- 1Y
- 4.22%
- 3Y*
- 5.61%
- 5Y*
- 2.91%
- 10Y*
- 3.12%
BND
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- -1.30%
- YTD
- 0.09%
- 6M
- 0.74%
- 1Y
- 3.96%
- 3Y*
- 3.60%
- 5Y*
- 0.25%
- 10Y*
- 1.68%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GILHX vs. BND - Expense Ratio Comparison
GILHX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than BND's 0.03% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GILHX vs. BND — Risk / Return Rank
GILHX
BND
GILHX vs. BND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guggenheim Limited Duration Fund (GILHX) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GILHX | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.32 | 0.93 | +1.39 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.37 | 1.32 | +3.05 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.56 | 1.16 | +0.39 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.26 | 1.75 | +2.51 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.90 | 4.78 | +12.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GILHX | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.32 | 0.93 | +1.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.33 | 0.04 | +1.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.71 | 0.30 | +1.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.67 | 0.59 | +1.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between GILHX and BND is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
GILHX vs. BND - Dividend Comparison
GILHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.15%, more than BND's 3.93% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GILHX Guggenheim Limited Duration Fund | 4.15% | 4.43% | 4.38% | 4.31% | 2.05% | 1.79% | 2.25% | 2.31% | 2.35% | 2.39% | 3.07% | 3.54% |
BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF | 3.93% | 3.86% | 3.67% | 3.09% | 2.60% | 2.12% | 2.38% | 2.72% | 2.81% | 2.54% | 2.51% | 2.57% |
Drawdowns
GILHX vs. BND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GILHX drawdown since its inception was -8.10%, smaller than the maximum BND drawdown of -18.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GILHX and BND.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GILHX | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.10% | -18.58% | +10.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.13% | -2.44% | +1.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -8.10% | -17.91% | +9.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -8.10% | -18.58% | +10.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.81% | -2.54% | +1.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.71% | -3.07% | +2.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.29% | 0.90% | -0.61% |
Volatility
GILHX vs. BND - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Guggenheim Limited Duration Fund (GILHX) is 0.54%, while Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) has a volatility of 1.63%. This indicates that GILHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GILHX | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.54% | 1.63% | -1.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.18% | 2.52% | -1.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.91% | 4.30% | -2.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.20% | 6.00% | -3.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.83% | 5.52% | -3.69% |