RMQHX vs. UTPIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H (RMQHX) and ProFunds Utilities UltraSector Fund (UTPIX).
RMQHX is a passively managed fund by Guggenheim that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100. It was launched on Nov 28, 2014. UTPIX is managed by ProFunds. It was launched on Jul 25, 2000.
Performance
RMQHX vs. UTPIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RMQHX vs. UTPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RMQHX Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H | -19.03% | 33.90% | 44.74% | 115.89% | -59.96% | 56.33% | 101.06% | 80.70% | -7.28% | 69.79% |
UTPIX ProFunds Utilities UltraSector Fund | 11.17% | 19.28% | 27.74% | -15.46% | -2.31% | 23.33% | -8.87% | 34.24% | 2.30% | 15.83% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RMQHX achieves a -19.03% return, which is significantly lower than UTPIX's 11.17% return. Over the past 10 years, RMQHX has outperformed UTPIX with an annualized return of 30.11%, while UTPIX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.47% annualized return.
RMQHX
- 1D
- -1.68%
- 1M
- -16.37%
- YTD
- -19.03%
- 6M
- -16.54%
- 1Y
- 31.59%
- 3Y*
- 33.83%
- 5Y*
- 15.52%
- 10Y*
- 30.11%
UTPIX
- 1D
- 0.95%
- 1M
- -5.20%
- YTD
- 11.17%
- 6M
- 7.51%
- 1Y
- 25.12%
- 3Y*
- 15.07%
- 5Y*
- 10.70%
- 10Y*
- 9.47%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RMQHX vs. UTPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RMQHX has a 1.27% expense ratio, which is lower than UTPIX's 1.73% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RMQHX vs. UTPIX — Risk / Return Rank
RMQHX
UTPIX
RMQHX vs. UTPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H (RMQHX) and ProFunds Utilities UltraSector Fund (UTPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RMQHX | UTPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.67 | 1.14 | -0.47 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.28 | 1.56 | -0.28 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.21 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.96 | 1.97 | -1.01 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.35 | 4.68 | -1.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RMQHX | UTPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 | 1.14 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 | 0.42 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 | 0.33 | +0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.25 | +0.38 |
Correlation
The correlation between RMQHX and UTPIX is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
RMQHX vs. UTPIX - Dividend Comparison
RMQHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 42.94%, more than UTPIX's 0.70% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RMQHX Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H | 42.94% | 34.77% | 25.22% | 3.66% | 0.00% | 2.13% | 5.17% | 0.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UTPIX ProFunds Utilities UltraSector Fund | 0.70% | 0.77% | 0.00% | 1.74% | 0.97% | 0.20% | 0.58% | 1.72% | 0.66% | 0.74% | 0.83% | 1.41% |
Drawdowns
RMQHX vs. UTPIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RMQHX drawdown since its inception was -63.21%, smaller than the maximum UTPIX drawdown of -73.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMQHX and UTPIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RMQHX | UTPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.21% | -73.56% | +10.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.11% | -14.45% | -10.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.21% | -38.73% | -24.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.21% | -50.82% | -12.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.97% | -5.20% | -19.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.01% | -22.00% | +8.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.21% | 6.09% | +1.12% |
Volatility
RMQHX vs. UTPIX - Volatility Comparison
Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H (RMQHX) has a higher volatility of 11.12% compared to ProFunds Utilities UltraSector Fund (UTPIX) at 7.78%. This indicates that RMQHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UTPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RMQHX | UTPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.12% | 7.78% | +3.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.22% | 15.71% | +9.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.33% | 23.99% | +23.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.20% | 25.80% | +20.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.31% | 28.98% | +17.33% |