PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RMQHX vs. UTPIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RMQHX vs. UTPIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H (RMQHX) and ProFunds Utilities UltraSector Fund (UTPIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RMQHX achieves a 38.83% return, which is significantly higher than UTPIX's -0.11% return. Over the past 10 years, RMQHX has outperformed UTPIX with an annualized return of 37.46%, while UTPIX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.20% annualized return.


RMQHX

1D
1.16%
1M
19.81%
YTD
38.83%
6M
35.00%
1Y
84.57%
3Y*
50.69%
5Y*
26.53%
10Y*
37.46%

UTPIX

1D
-4.62%
1M
-11.48%
YTD
-0.11%
6M
-3.59%
1Y
7.13%
3Y*
13.59%
5Y*
7.97%
10Y*
8.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RMQHX vs. UTPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RMQHX
Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H
38.83%33.90%44.74%115.89%-59.96%56.33%101.06%80.70%-7.28%69.79%
UTPIX
ProFunds Utilities UltraSector Fund
-0.11%19.28%27.74%-15.46%-2.31%23.33%-8.87%34.24%2.30%15.83%

Correlation

The correlation between RMQHX and UTPIX is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2015

0.26

The correlation between RMQHX and UTPIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (1 year) to 0.26 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RMQHX vs. UTPIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RMQHX
RMQHX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
RMQHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RMQHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
RMQHX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
RMQHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
RMQHX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

UTPIX
UTPIX Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
UTPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UTPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
UTPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
UTPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
UTPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RMQHX vs. UTPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H (RMQHX) and ProFunds Utilities UltraSector Fund (UTPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RMQHXUTPIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.73

0.34

+2.38

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.18

0.61

+2.57

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.08

+0.34

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.47

0.63

+2.85

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.59

1.42

+11.17

RMQHX vs. UTPIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RMQHX Sharpe Ratio is 2.73, which is higher than the UTPIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RMQHX and UTPIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RMQHXUTPIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.73

0.34

+2.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.31

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

0.28

+0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

0.23

+0.52

Drawdowns

RMQHX vs. UTPIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RMQHX drawdown since its inception was -63.21%, smaller than the maximum UTPIX drawdown of -73.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMQHX and UTPIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RMQHXUTPIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.21%

-73.56%

+10.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.97%

-14.82%

-10.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.46%

-25.70%

-16.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.21%

-38.73%

-24.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.21%

-50.82%

-12.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-14.82%

+14.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.87%

-21.90%

+9.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.89%

6.54%

+0.35%

Volatility

RMQHX vs. UTPIX - Volatility Comparison

Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H (RMQHX) has a higher volatility of 8.62% compared to ProFunds Utilities UltraSector Fund (UTPIX) at 7.63%. This indicates that RMQHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UTPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RMQHXUTPIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.62%

7.63%

+0.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.34%

17.75%

+6.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.21%

22.01%

+10.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

46.22%

26.01%

+20.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.44%

29.06%

+17.38%

RMQHX vs. UTPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RMQHX has a 1.27% expense ratio, which is lower than UTPIX's 1.73% expense ratio.


Dividends

RMQHX vs. UTPIX - Dividend Comparison

RMQHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 25.05%, more than UTPIX's 0.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RMQHX
Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H
25.05%34.77%25.22%3.66%0.00%2.13%5.17%0.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UTPIX
ProFunds Utilities UltraSector Fund
0.77%0.77%0.00%1.74%0.97%0.20%0.58%1.72%0.66%0.74%0.83%1.41%

Frequently Asked Questions


RMQHX and UTPIX have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RMQHX has higher volatility (8.62%) compared to UTPIX (7.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RMQHX dropped -63.21% vs UTPIX's -73.56%.

RMQHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RMQHX and UTPIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer