PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
GILHX vs. BATAX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between GILHX and BATAX is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.7

Performance

GILHX vs. BATAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Guggenheim Limited Duration Fund (GILHX) and BlackRock Allocation Target Shares Series A Portfolio (BATAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-0.50%0.00%0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%2.50%3.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
2.03%
2.80%
GILHX
BATAX

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

GILHX:

2.97

BATAX:

3.41

Sortino Ratio

GILHX:

5.36

BATAX:

8.20

Omega Ratio

GILHX:

1.71

BATAX:

2.24

Calmar Ratio

GILHX:

6.70

BATAX:

12.12

Martin Ratio

GILHX:

18.81

BATAX:

35.42

Ulcer Index

GILHX:

0.30%

BATAX:

0.21%

Daily Std Dev

GILHX:

1.93%

BATAX:

2.24%

Max Drawdown

GILHX:

-7.82%

BATAX:

-17.42%

Current Drawdown

GILHX:

-0.12%

BATAX:

-0.11%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GILHX achieves a 0.16% return, which is significantly lower than BATAX's 0.32% return.


GILHX

YTD

0.16%

1M

0.41%

6M

2.02%

1Y

5.80%

5Y*

2.86%

10Y*

2.78%

BATAX

YTD

0.32%

1M

0.42%

6M

2.80%

1Y

7.73%

5Y*

3.16%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GILHX vs. BATAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GILHX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than BATAX's 0.00% expense ratio.


GILHX
Guggenheim Limited Duration Fund
Expense ratio chart for GILHX: current value at 0.49% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.49%
Expense ratio chart for BATAX: current value at 0.00% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.00%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

GILHX vs. BATAX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GILHX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GILHX is 9595
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GILHX is 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GILHX is 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GILHX is 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GILHX is 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GILHX is 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

BATAX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BATAX is 9797
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BATAX is 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BATAX is 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BATAX is 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BATAX is 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BATAX is 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

GILHX vs. BATAX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guggenheim Limited Duration Fund (GILHX) and BlackRock Allocation Target Shares Series A Portfolio (BATAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GILHX, currently valued at 2.97, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.002.973.41
The chart of Sortino ratio for GILHX, currently valued at 5.36, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.005.368.20
The chart of Omega ratio for GILHX, currently valued at 1.71, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.712.24
The chart of Calmar ratio for GILHX, currently valued at 6.70, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.006.7012.12
The chart of Martin ratio for GILHX, currently valued at 18.81, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.0018.8135.42
GILHX
BATAX

The current GILHX Sharpe Ratio is 2.97, which is comparable to the BATAX Sharpe Ratio of 3.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GILHX and BATAX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio3.003.504.004.50SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
2.97
3.41
GILHX
BATAX

Dividends

GILHX vs. BATAX - Dividend Comparison

GILHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.04%, less than BATAX's 5.91% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
GILHX
Guggenheim Limited Duration Fund
4.04%4.39%4.31%2.67%1.69%1.97%2.51%2.41%2.55%3.05%3.54%1.93%
BATAX
BlackRock Allocation Target Shares Series A Portfolio
5.91%6.45%5.82%3.90%2.63%3.48%4.78%5.25%4.66%6.64%1.48%0.00%

Drawdowns

GILHX vs. BATAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GILHX drawdown since its inception was -7.82%, smaller than the maximum BATAX drawdown of -17.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GILHX and BATAX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-0.80%-0.60%-0.40%-0.20%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-0.12%
-0.11%
GILHX
BATAX

Volatility

GILHX vs. BATAX - Volatility Comparison

Guggenheim Limited Duration Fund (GILHX) has a higher volatility of 0.39% compared to BlackRock Allocation Target Shares Series A Portfolio (BATAX) at 0.35%. This indicates that GILHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BATAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.30%0.40%0.50%0.60%0.70%0.80%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
0.39%
0.35%
GILHX
BATAX
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab