GILHX vs. BATAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Guggenheim Limited Duration Fund (GILHX) and BlackRock Allocation Target Shares Series A Portfolio (BATAX).
GILHX is managed by Guggenheim. It was launched on Dec 16, 2013. BATAX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Sep 21, 2015.
Performance
GILHX vs. BATAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GILHX vs. BATAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GILHX Guggenheim Limited Duration Fund | -0.01% | 6.02% | 6.00% | 7.28% | -4.90% | 0.00% | 6.51% | 2.21% | 1.66% | 2.91% |
BATAX BlackRock Allocation Target Shares Series A Portfolio | 0.59% | 7.37% | 7.34% | 6.43% | -5.87% | 1.72% | 2.75% | 6.76% | 2.20% | 5.21% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GILHX achieves a -0.01% return, which is significantly lower than BATAX's 0.59% return. Over the past 10 years, GILHX has underperformed BATAX with an annualized return of 3.12%, while BATAX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.68% annualized return.
GILHX
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -0.65%
- YTD
- -0.01%
- 6M
- 1.21%
- 1Y
- 4.22%
- 3Y*
- 5.61%
- 5Y*
- 2.91%
- 10Y*
- 3.12%
BATAX
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -0.52%
- YTD
- 0.59%
- 6M
- 1.98%
- 1Y
- 5.86%
- 3Y*
- 6.46%
- 5Y*
- 3.34%
- 10Y*
- 3.68%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GILHX vs. BATAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GILHX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than BATAX's 0.00% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GILHX vs. BATAX — Risk / Return Rank
GILHX
BATAX
GILHX vs. BATAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guggenheim Limited Duration Fund (GILHX) and BlackRock Allocation Target Shares Series A Portfolio (BATAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GILHX | BATAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.32 | 2.86 | -0.54 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.37 | 6.36 | -1.99 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.56 | 1.98 | -0.42 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.26 | 5.55 | -1.29 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.90 | 21.28 | -4.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GILHX | BATAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.32 | 2.86 | -0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.33 | 1.57 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.71 | 1.21 | +0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.67 | 1.08 | +0.59 |
Correlation
The correlation between GILHX and BATAX is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
GILHX vs. BATAX - Dividend Comparison
GILHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.15%, less than BATAX's 5.38% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GILHX Guggenheim Limited Duration Fund | 4.15% | 4.43% | 4.38% | 4.31% | 2.05% | 1.79% | 2.25% | 2.31% | 2.35% | 2.39% | 3.07% | 3.54% |
BATAX BlackRock Allocation Target Shares Series A Portfolio | 5.38% | 5.92% | 5.45% | 3.91% | 3.14% | 1.82% | 3.22% | 4.73% | 5.36% | 4.10% | 0.40% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
GILHX vs. BATAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GILHX drawdown since its inception was -8.10%, smaller than the maximum BATAX drawdown of -17.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GILHX and BATAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GILHX | BATAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.10% | -17.42% | +9.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.13% | -1.15% | +0.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -8.10% | -8.12% | +0.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -8.10% | -17.42% | +9.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.81% | -0.73% | -0.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.71% | -1.32% | +0.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.29% | 0.30% | -0.01% |
Volatility
GILHX vs. BATAX - Volatility Comparison
Guggenheim Limited Duration Fund (GILHX) has a higher volatility of 0.54% compared to BlackRock Allocation Target Shares Series A Portfolio (BATAX) at 0.43%. This indicates that GILHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BATAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GILHX | BATAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.54% | 0.43% | +0.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.18% | 1.36% | -0.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.91% | 2.12% | -0.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.20% | 2.14% | +0.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.83% | 3.07% | -1.24% |