RMQHX vs. DXNLX
Compare and contrast key facts about Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H (RMQHX) and Direxion Monthly NASDAQ-100 Bull 1.25X Fund (DXNLX).
RMQHX is a passively managed fund by Guggenheim that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100. It was launched on Nov 28, 2014. DXNLX is managed by Direxion. It was launched on Mar 31, 2016.
Performance
RMQHX vs. DXNLX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RMQHX vs. DXNLX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RMQHX Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H | -12.99% | 33.90% | 44.74% | 115.89% | -59.96% | 56.33% | 101.06% | 80.70% | -7.28% | 66.53% |
DXNLX Direxion Monthly NASDAQ-100 Bull 1.25X Fund | -8.07% | 22.13% | 28.56% | 66.63% | -40.88% | 32.49% | 58.90% | 46.34% | -3.37% | 37.37% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RMQHX achieves a -12.99% return, which is significantly lower than DXNLX's -8.07% return.
RMQHX
- 1D
- 7.46%
- 1M
- -10.36%
- YTD
- -12.99%
- 6M
- -11.17%
- 1Y
- 39.17%
- 3Y*
- 37.08%
- 5Y*
- 16.36%
- 10Y*
- 31.05%
DXNLX
- 1D
- 4.35%
- 1M
- -6.44%
- YTD
- -8.07%
- 6M
- -6.58%
- 1Y
- 24.75%
- 3Y*
- 24.29%
- 5Y*
- 12.62%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RMQHX vs. DXNLX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RMQHX has a 1.27% expense ratio, which is higher than DXNLX's 1.19% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RMQHX vs. DXNLX — Risk / Return Rank
RMQHX
DXNLX
RMQHX vs. DXNLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H (RMQHX) and Direxion Monthly NASDAQ-100 Bull 1.25X Fund (DXNLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RMQHX | DXNLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.87 | 0.93 | -0.05 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.54 | 1.53 | 0.00 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.21 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.64 | 1.63 | +0.01 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.65 | 5.71 | -0.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RMQHX | DXNLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 | 0.93 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | 0.45 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.73 | -0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between RMQHX and DXNLX is 1.00, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
RMQHX vs. DXNLX - Dividend Comparison
RMQHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 39.96%, more than DXNLX's 1.08% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RMQHX Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H | 39.96% | 34.77% | 25.22% | 3.66% | 0.00% | 2.13% | 5.17% | 0.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DXNLX Direxion Monthly NASDAQ-100 Bull 1.25X Fund | 1.08% | 2.31% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 7.43% | 12.20% | 0.00% | 8.79% | 7.52% |
Drawdowns
RMQHX vs. DXNLX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RMQHX drawdown since its inception was -63.21%, which is greater than DXNLX's maximum drawdown of -43.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMQHX and DXNLX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RMQHX | DXNLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.21% | -43.77% | -19.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.11% | -15.93% | -9.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.21% | -43.77% | -19.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.21% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.37% | -12.25% | -7.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.01% | -8.83% | -4.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.31% | 4.55% | +2.76% |
Volatility
RMQHX vs. DXNLX - Volatility Comparison
Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H (RMQHX) has a higher volatility of 13.71% compared to Direxion Monthly NASDAQ-100 Bull 1.25X Fund (DXNLX) at 8.28%. This indicates that RMQHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DXNLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RMQHX | DXNLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.71% | 8.28% | +5.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.24% | 16.13% | +10.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.80% | 28.24% | +19.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.30% | 28.28% | +18.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.36% | 28.97% | +17.39% |