RKSG vs. CCOR

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

RKSG (Ruk Strategic Growth ETF) and CCOR (Core Alternative ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. RKSG is passively managed, while CCOR is actively managed. Their 0.13 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. RKSG charges 0.50%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for CCOR.

Performance

RKSG vs. CCOR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ruk Strategic Growth ETF (RKSG) and Core Alternative ETF (CCOR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

RKSG

• 1D: 1.30%
• 1M: 3.51%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

CCOR

• 1D: 0.37%
• 1M: 1.50%
• 6M: -2.63%
• YTD: 1.40%
• 1Y: 0.01%
• 3Y*: -0.96%
• 5Y*: -1.46%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 1.81%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CCOR Core Alternative ETF	$61.50K	$56.93K	$78.52K
RKSG Ruk Strategic Growth ETF	$31.32K	$31.13K	$35.98K

RKSG vs. CCOR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
RKSG Ruk Strategic Growth ETF	14.25%
CCOR Core Alternative ETF	2.25%

Correlation

The correlation between RKSG and CCOR is 0.13, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2026	0.13

RKSG vs. CCOR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RKSG	CCOR
Technology	34.2%	15.7%
Healthcare	17.4%	12.2%
Financial Services	12.2%	18.6%
Industrials	10.1%	9.4%
Communication Services	7.9%	7.8%
Consumer Cyclical	5.3%	9.1%
Energy	4.0%	6.4%
Basic Materials	2.7%	4.9%
Consumer Defensive	2.6%	6.9%
Utilities	1.6%	6.3%
Real Estate	1.1%	2.8%

Return for Risk

RKSG vs. CCOR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RKSG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CCOR

CCOR Risk / Return Rank: 10
CCOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
CCOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
CCOR Omega Ratio Rank: 9
CCOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
CCOR Martin Ratio Rank: 10

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RKSG vs. CCOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ruk Strategic Growth ETF (RKSG) and Core Alternative ETF (CCOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RKSG	CCOR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	0.00	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	0.06	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.01	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	0.00	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	0.00	—

Drawdowns

RKSG vs. CCOR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RKSG drawdown since its inception was -5.34%, smaller than the maximum CCOR drawdown of -22.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RKSG and CCOR.

Drawdown Indicators

	RKSG	CCOR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.34%	-22.99%	+17.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-8.79%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-12.31%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-22.99%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-15.78%	+15.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.38%	-7.47%	+6.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.19%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RKSG	CCOR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.00%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	6.47%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.58%	8.23%	+3.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.58%	11.19%	+0.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.58%	10.77%	+0.81%

RKSG vs. CCOR - Expense Ratio Comparison

RKSG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than CCOR's 1.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

RKSG vs. CCOR - Dividend Comparison

RKSG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CCOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CCOR Core Alternative ETF	0.98%	1.07%	1.18%	1.21%	1.11%	1.02%	1.50%	0.73%	1.53%	0.89%
RKSG Ruk Strategic Growth ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RKSG and CCOR in my portfolio?

RKSG and CCOR have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RKSG or CCOR?

On fees, RKSG is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RKSG or CCOR?

RKSG is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for CCOR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RKSG or CCOR?

CCOR has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.00% for RKSG.

What is the main difference between RKSG and CCOR?

They also come from different issuers: Ruk and Core Alternative. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for RKSG and 1.09% for CCOR.