RKSG vs. MFUS
RKSG (Ruk Strategic Growth ETF) and MFUS (PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - RKSG tracks the Ruk Strategic Growth Index while MFUS tracks the RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Index. Both are passively managed. Their 0.52 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. RKSG charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for MFUS.
Performance
RKSG vs. MFUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
RKSG
- 1D
- 1.30%
- 1M
- 3.51%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
MFUS
- 1D
- 1.95%
- 1M
- 1.60%
- 6M
- 12.71%
- YTD
- 18.83%
- 1Y
- 26.88%
- 3Y*
- 20.74%
- 5Y*
- 13.31%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 13.65%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.13M | $1.05M | $961.83K | |
| $31.32K | $31.13K | $35.98K |
RKSG vs. MFUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
RKSG Ruk Strategic Growth ETF | 14.25% |
MFUS PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF | 13.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between RKSG and MFUS is 0.52, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2026 | 0.52 |
RKSG vs. MFUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RKSG
MFUS
Technology
Healthcare
Financial Services
Industrials
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
RKSG
MFUS
Healthcare
RKSG
MFUS
Financial Services
RKSG
MFUS
Industrials
RKSG
MFUS
Communication Services
RKSG
MFUS
Consumer Cyclical
RKSG
MFUS
Energy
RKSG
MFUS
Basic Materials
RKSG
MFUS
Consumer Defensive
RKSG
MFUS
Utilities
RKSG
MFUS
Real Estate
RKSG
MFUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RKSG vs. MFUS — Risk / Return Rank
RKSG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
MFUS
RKSG vs. MFUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ruk Strategic Growth ETF (RKSG) and PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RKSG | MFUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.43 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.23 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 15.97 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RKSG vs. MFUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RKSG drawdown since its inception was -5.34%, smaller than the maximum MFUS drawdown of -35.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RKSG and MFUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RKSG | MFUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.34% | -35.21% | +29.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.39% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.39% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.22% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.27% | +0.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.38% | -3.95% | +2.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.69% | — |
Volatility
RKSG vs. MFUS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RKSG | MFUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.49% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.26% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.58% | 11.53% | +0.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.58% | 15.03% | -3.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.58% | 17.29% | -5.71% |
RKSG vs. MFUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
RKSG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than MFUS's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
RKSG vs. MFUS - Dividend Comparison
RKSG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MFUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.35%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFUS PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF | 1.35% | 1.54% | 1.45% | 1.96% | 2.07% | 1.35% | 1.72% | 1.89% | 1.69% | 1.01% |
RKSG Ruk Strategic Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RKSG and MFUS have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MFUS is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MFUS is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for RKSG.
MFUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.35%, compared with 0.00% for RKSG.
RKSG tracks Ruk Strategic Growth Index, while MFUS tracks RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Index. They also come from different issuers: Ruk and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for RKSG and 0.30% for MFUS.
Find the right allocation for RKSG and MFUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer