RKSG vs. HLAL

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

RKSG (Ruk Strategic Growth ETF) and HLAL (Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - RKSG tracks the Ruk Strategic Growth Index while HLAL tracks the FTSE Shariah USA Index. Both are passively managed. Their 0.70 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. Both charge a 0.50% expense ratio.

Performance

RKSG vs. HLAL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ruk Strategic Growth ETF (RKSG) and Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF (HLAL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

RKSG

• 1D: 1.30%
• 1M: 3.51%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

HLAL

• 1D: 2.41%
• 1M: 3.59%
• 6M: 15.01%
• YTD: 17.59%
• 1Y: 33.31%
• 3Y*: 20.16%
• 5Y*: 14.09%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 17.34%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
HLAL Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF	$3.79M	$3.57M	$4.37M
RKSG Ruk Strategic Growth ETF	$31.32K	$31.13K	$35.98K

RKSG vs. HLAL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
RKSG Ruk Strategic Growth ETF	14.25%
HLAL Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF	21.15%

Correlation

The correlation between RKSG and HLAL is 0.70, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2026	0.70

RKSG vs. HLAL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RKSG	HLAL
Technology	34.2%	57.0%
Healthcare	17.4%	9.6%
Financial Services	12.2%	0.0%
Industrials	10.1%	5.1%
Communication Services	7.9%	13.8%
Consumer Cyclical	5.3%	5.0%
Energy	4.0%	3.9%
Basic Materials	2.7%	2.1%
Consumer Defensive	2.6%	2.6%
Utilities	1.6%	0.2%
Real Estate	1.1%	0.8%

Return for Risk

RKSG vs. HLAL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RKSG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

HLAL

HLAL Risk / Return Rank: 82
HLAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
HLAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
HLAL Omega Ratio Rank: 82
HLAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
HLAL Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RKSG vs. HLAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ruk Strategic Growth ETF (RKSG) and Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF (HLAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RKSG	HLAL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.17	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.04	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.38	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	3.28	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	12.05	—

Drawdowns

RKSG vs. HLAL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RKSG drawdown since its inception was -5.34%, smaller than the maximum HLAL drawdown of -33.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RKSG and HLAL.

Drawdown Indicators

	RKSG	HLAL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.34%	-33.57%	+28.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-10.20%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-21.67%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-23.18%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.03%	+1.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.38%	-4.97%	+3.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.77%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RKSG	HLAL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.72%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	12.83%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.58%	15.46%	-3.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.58%	17.96%	-6.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.58%	20.25%	-8.67%

RKSG vs. HLAL - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both RKSG and HLAL have an expense ratio of 0.50%.

Dividends

RKSG vs. HLAL - Dividend Comparison

RKSG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HLAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
HLAL Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF	0.44%	0.53%	0.58%	0.72%	1.15%	0.78%	0.97%	0.72%
RKSG Ruk Strategic Growth ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RKSG and HLAL in my portfolio?

RKSG and HLAL have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RKSG or HLAL?

Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RKSG or HLAL?

RKSG and HLAL have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RKSG or HLAL?

HLAL has the higher dividend yield at 0.44%, compared with 0.00% for RKSG.

What is the main difference between RKSG and HLAL?

RKSG tracks Ruk Strategic Growth Index, while HLAL tracks FTSE Shariah USA Index. They also come from different issuers: Ruk and Wahed.