CCOR vs. VOO
CCOR (Core Alternative ETF) and VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CCOR is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Core Alternative Capital, while VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. CCOR is actively managed, while VOO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CCOR returned -2.18%/yr vs 13.58%/yr for VOO. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CCOR charges 1.09%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VOO.
Performance
CCOR vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CCOR achieves a -4.04% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 9.75% return.
CCOR
- 1D
- -0.61%
- 1M
- -2.07%
- YTD
- -4.04%
- 6M
- -4.17%
- 1Y
- -5.15%
- 3Y*
- -2.14%
- 5Y*
- -2.18%
- 10Y*
- —
VOO
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 0.08%
- YTD
- 9.75%
- 6M
- 9.30%
- 1Y
- 26.77%
- 3Y*
- 21.36%
- 5Y*
- 13.58%
- 10Y*
- 15.77%
CCOR vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCOR Core Alternative ETF | -4.04% | 3.52% | -5.70% | -11.92% | 2.51% | 9.90% | 4.07% | 6.03% | 4.64% | 3.97% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 9.75% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -4.50% | 12.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between CCOR and VOO is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2017 | 0.23 |
The correlation between CCOR and VOO shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (3 years) to 0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
CCOR vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CCOR
VOO
Financial Services
Technology
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Financial Services
CCOR
VOO
Technology
CCOR
VOO
Healthcare
CCOR
VOO
Industrials
CCOR
VOO
Consumer Cyclical
CCOR
VOO
Communication Services
CCOR
VOO
Energy
CCOR
VOO
Consumer Defensive
CCOR
VOO
Utilities
CCOR
VOO
Basic Materials
CCOR
VOO
Real Estate
CCOR
VOO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CCOR vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
CCOR
VOO
CCOR vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Core Alternative ETF (CCOR) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CCOR | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.39 | -0.50 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.59 | 3.02 | -3.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.27 | 13.58 | -14.85 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CCOR vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CCOR drawdown since its inception was -22.99%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCOR and VOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CCOR | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.99% | -33.99% | +11.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.79% | -8.90% | +0.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.31% | -18.69% | +6.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.99% | -24.52% | +1.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.30% | -1.74% | -18.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.34% | -3.68% | -3.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.07% | 1.98% | +2.09% |
Volatility
CCOR vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Core Alternative ETF (CCOR) is 3.21%, while Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a volatility of 4.60%. This indicates that CCOR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CCOR | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.21% | 4.60% | -1.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.51% | 9.73% | -4.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.44% | 12.39% | -4.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.14% | 16.90% | -5.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.76% | 18.05% | -7.29% |
CCOR vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CCOR has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
CCOR vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
CCOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, which matches VOO's 1.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCOR Core Alternative ETF | 1.04% | 1.07% | 1.18% | 1.21% | 1.11% | 1.02% | 1.50% | 0.73% | 1.53% | 0.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.04% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CCOR and VOO have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VOO has higher volatility (4.60%) compared to CCOR (3.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCOR dropped -22.99% vs VOO's -33.99%.
On 5-year performance, VOO leads with 13.58% vs -2.18% for CCOR. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, CCOR has been the lower-risk option at 3.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VOO has performed better with a 13.58% return vs -2.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for CCOR.
CCOR and VOO have nearly identical dividend yields, around 1.04%.
CCOR is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Core Alternative Capital and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 1.09% for CCOR and 0.03% for VOO.
VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs -0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CCOR and VOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer