PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RKSG vs. DARP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RKSG vs. DARP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ruk Strategic Growth ETF (RKSG) and Grizzle Growth ETF (DARP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


RKSG

1D
0.29%
1M
1.06%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DARP

1D
-0.88%
1M
-3.12%
6M
20.79%
YTD
26.45%
1Y
56.50%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RKSG vs. DARP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)
RKSG
Ruk Strategic Growth ETF
11.35%
DARP
Grizzle Growth ETF
18.44%

Correlation

The correlation between RKSG and DARP is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2026

0.46

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RKSG vs. DARP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RKSG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


DARP
DARP Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
DARP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DARP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
DARP Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
DARP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
DARP Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RKSG vs. DARP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ruk Strategic Growth ETF (RKSG) and Grizzle Growth ETF (DARP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RKSGDARPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.13

RKSG vs. DARP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RKSG vs. DARP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RKSG drawdown since its inception was -5.34%, smaller than the maximum DARP drawdown of -30.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RKSG and DARP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RKSGDARPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.34%

-30.27%

+24.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.17%

-5.41%

+4.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.36%

-4.64%

+3.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.51%

Volatility

RKSG vs. DARP - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RKSGDARPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.83%

25.60%

-13.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.83%

26.57%

-14.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.83%

26.57%

-14.74%

RKSG vs. DARP - Expense Ratio Comparison

RKSG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than DARP's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

RKSG vs. DARP - Dividend Comparison

RKSG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DARP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%.


PositionTTM202520242023
DARP
Grizzle Growth ETF
0.34%0.43%1.93%0.32%
RKSG
Ruk Strategic Growth ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RKSG and DARP have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, RKSG is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

RKSG is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for DARP.

DARP has the higher dividend yield at 0.34%, compared with 0.00% for RKSG.

They also come from different issuers: Ruk Funds and Grizzle. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for RKSG and 0.75% for DARP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RKSG and DARP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer