CCOR vs. BIMBX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

CCOR (Core Alternative ETF) and BIMBX (BlackRock Systematic Multi-Strategy Class I) are both funds - CCOR is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Core Alternative Capital, while BIMBX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by BlackRock. Over the past 5 years, CCOR returned -2.18%/yr vs 3.60%/yr for BIMBX. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CCOR charges 1.09%/yr vs 0.98%/yr for BIMBX.

Performance

CCOR vs. BIMBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Core Alternative ETF (CCOR) and BlackRock Systematic Multi-Strategy Class I (BIMBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCOR achieves a -4.04% return, which is significantly lower than BIMBX's 0.10% return.

CCOR

• 1D: -0.61%
• 1M: -2.07%
• YTD: -4.04%
• 6M: -4.17%
• 1Y: -5.15%
• 3Y*: -2.14%
• 5Y*: -2.18%
• 10Y*: —

BIMBX

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: 0.58%
• YTD: 0.10%
• 6M: 0.24%
• 1Y: 2.07%
• 3Y*: 6.23%
• 5Y*: 3.60%
• 10Y*: 4.57%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CCOR vs. BIMBX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CCOR Core Alternative ETF	-4.04%	3.52%	-5.70%	-11.92%	2.51%	9.90%	4.07%	6.03%	4.64%	3.97%
BIMBX BlackRock Systematic Multi-Strategy Class I	0.10%	5.00%	6.83%	6.43%	-2.95%	6.18%	3.57%	8.43%	1.83%	5.76%

Correlation

The correlation between CCOR and BIMBX is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.39
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.27
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.27
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2017	0.25

The correlation between CCOR and BIMBX shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (all time) to 0.39 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

CCOR vs. BIMBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCOR

CCOR Risk / Return Rank: 3
CCOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
CCOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
CCOR Omega Ratio Rank: 3
CCOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
CCOR Martin Ratio Rank: 2

BIMBX

BIMBX Risk / Return Rank: 7
BIMBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
BIMBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
BIMBX Omega Ratio Rank: 7
BIMBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
BIMBX Martin Ratio Rank: 6

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCOR vs. BIMBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Core Alternative ETF (CCOR) and BlackRock Systematic Multi-Strategy Class I (BIMBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CCOR	BIMBX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.70	0.59	-1.28
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.91	0.87	-1.78
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.89	1.11	-0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.59	0.49	-1.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.27	1.19	-2.46

CCOR vs. BIMBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CCOR Sharpe Ratio is -0.70, which is lower than the BIMBX Sharpe Ratio of 0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCOR and BIMBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CCOR vs. BIMBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCOR drawdown since its inception was -22.99%, which is greater than BIMBX's maximum drawdown of -8.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCOR and BIMBX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CCOR	BIMBX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.99%	-8.73%	-14.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.79%	-5.09%	-3.70%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.31%	-5.09%	-7.22%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.99%	-6.50%	-16.49%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-8.73%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-20.30%	-3.98%	-16.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.34%	-1.20%	-6.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.07%	2.08%	+1.99%

Volatility

CCOR vs. BIMBX - Volatility Comparison

Core Alternative ETF (CCOR) has a higher volatility of 3.21% compared to BlackRock Systematic Multi-Strategy Class I (BIMBX) at 1.19%. This indicates that CCOR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIMBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CCOR	BIMBX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.21%	1.19%	+2.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.51%	3.33%	+2.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.44%	4.23%	+3.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.14%	3.64%	+7.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.76%	3.59%	+7.17%

CCOR vs. BIMBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CCOR has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is higher than BIMBX's 0.98% expense ratio.

Dividends

CCOR vs. BIMBX - Dividend Comparison

CCOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, less than BIMBX's 2.27% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
BIMBX BlackRock Systematic Multi-Strategy Class I	2.27%	2.27%	4.07%	4.48%	4.99%	2.62%	1.31%	3.90%	8.93%	4.08%	5.00%
CCOR Core Alternative ETF	1.04%	1.07%	1.18%	1.21%	1.11%	1.02%	1.50%	0.73%	1.53%	0.89%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CCOR and BIMBX in my portfolio?

CCOR and BIMBX have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CCOR or BIMBX?

CCOR has higher volatility (3.21%) compared to BIMBX (1.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCOR dropped -22.99% vs BIMBX's -8.73%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BIMBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.59 vs -0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.