RKSG vs. GARY

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

RKSG (Ruk Strategic Growth ETF) and GARY (Mango Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. RKSG is passively managed, while GARY is actively managed. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RKSG charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for GARY.

Performance

RKSG vs. GARY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ruk Strategic Growth ETF (RKSG) and Mango Growth ETF (GARY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

RKSG

• 1D: 0.29%
• 1M: 1.06%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GARY

• 1D: -0.27%
• 1M: -1.58%
• 6M: 25.08%
• YTD: 31.13%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RKSG vs. GARY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
RKSG Ruk Strategic Growth ETF	11.35%
GARY Mango Growth ETF	23.74%

Correlation

The correlation between RKSG and GARY is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2026	0.61

Return for Risk

RKSG vs. GARY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ruk Strategic Growth ETF (RKSG) and Mango Growth ETF (GARY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

RKSG vs. GARY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RKSG drawdown since its inception was -5.34%, smaller than the maximum GARY drawdown of -10.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RKSG and GARY.

Drawdown Indicators

	RKSG	GARY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.34%	-10.28%	+4.94%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.17%	-4.43%	+3.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.36%	-1.90%	+0.54%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RKSG	GARY	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.83%	21.72%	-9.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.83%	21.72%	-9.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.83%	21.72%	-9.89%

RKSG vs. GARY - Expense Ratio Comparison

RKSG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than GARY's 0.77% expense ratio.

Dividends

RKSG vs. GARY - Dividend Comparison

RKSG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GARY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%.

Position	TTM	2025
GARY Mango Growth ETF	0.04%	0.05%
RKSG Ruk Strategic Growth ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RKSG and GARY in my portfolio?

RKSG and GARY have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RKSG or GARY?

On fees, RKSG is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RKSG or GARY?

RKSG is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for GARY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RKSG or GARY?

GARY has the higher dividend yield at 0.04%, compared with 0.00% for RKSG.

What is the main difference between RKSG and GARY?

They also come from different issuers: Ruk Funds and Mango. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for RKSG and 0.77% for GARY.