CCOR vs. QMNNX

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

CCOR (Core Alternative ETF) and QMNNX (AQR Equity Market Neutral Fund Class N) are both funds - CCOR is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Core Alternative, while QMNNX is a Equity Market Neutral fund actively managed by AQR. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, CCOR returned -1.67%/yr vs 18.24%/yr for QMNNX. Their 0.01 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. CCOR charges 1.09%/yr vs 1.62%/yr for QMNNX.

Performance

CCOR vs. QMNNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Core Alternative ETF (CCOR) and AQR Equity Market Neutral Fund Class N (QMNNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCOR achieves a 0.43% return, which is significantly higher than QMNNX's -6.23% return.

CCOR

• 1D: -0.57%
• 1M: 0.53%
• 6M: -3.08%
• YTD: 0.43%
• 1Y: -1.08%
• 3Y*: -0.82%
• 5Y*: -1.67%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 1.70%

QMNNX

• 1D: 1.24%
• 1M: 3.72%
• 6M: -3.21%
• YTD: -6.23%
• 1Y: 5.21%
• 3Y*: 17.30%
• 5Y*: 18.24%
• 10Y*: 5.90%
• ALL TIME*: 6.64%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CCOR Core Alternative ETF	$61.54K	$68.15K	$77.63K
QMNNX AQR Equity Market Neutral Fund Class N	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

CCOR vs. QMNNX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CCOR Core Alternative ETF	0.43%	3.52%	-5.70%	-11.92%	2.51%	9.90%	4.07%	6.03%	4.64%	3.97%
QMNNX AQR Equity Market Neutral Fund Class N	-6.23%	26.19%	25.43%	16.30%	27.07%	17.38%	-19.79%	-11.55%	-11.94%	5.92%

Correlation

The correlation between CCOR and QMNNX is -0.20, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.20
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	-0.16
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	-0.08
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2017	0.01

The correlation between CCOR and QMNNX shifts across timeframes, from -0.20 (1 year) to 0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

CCOR vs. QMNNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CCOR

CCOR Risk / Return Rank: 9
CCOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
CCOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
CCOR Omega Ratio Rank: 8
CCOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
CCOR Martin Ratio Rank: 9

QMNNX

QMNNX Risk / Return Rank: 18
QMNNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
QMNNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
QMNNX Omega Ratio Rank: 21
QMNNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
QMNNX Martin Ratio Rank: 10

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CCOR vs. QMNNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Core Alternative ETF (CCOR) and AQR Equity Market Neutral Fund Class N (QMNNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CCOR	QMNNX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.12	0.78	-0.90
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.11	1.15	-1.26
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.99	1.14	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.11	0.55	-0.66
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.23	1.14	-1.37

CCOR vs. QMNNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CCOR Sharpe Ratio is -0.12, which is lower than the QMNNX Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCOR and QMNNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CCOR vs. QMNNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCOR drawdown since its inception was -22.99%, smaller than the maximum QMNNX drawdown of -39.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCOR and QMNNX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CCOR	QMNNX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.99%	-39.22%	+16.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.79%	-9.96%	+1.17%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.31%	-9.96%	-2.35%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.99%	-13.98%	-9.01%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-39.22%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-16.59%	-6.61%	-9.98%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.47%	-10.57%	+3.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.18%	4.76%	-0.58%

Volatility

CCOR vs. QMNNX - Volatility Comparison

Core Alternative ETF (CCOR) has a higher volatility of 3.61% compared to AQR Equity Market Neutral Fund Class N (QMNNX) at 2.61%. This indicates that CCOR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QMNNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CCOR	QMNNX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.61%	2.61%	+1.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.45%	5.65%	+0.80%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.20%	7.00%	+1.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.19%	9.30%	+1.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.78%	8.35%	+2.43%

CCOR vs. QMNNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CCOR has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is lower than QMNNX's 1.62% expense ratio.

Dividends

CCOR vs. QMNNX - Dividend Comparison

CCOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, less than QMNNX's 1.34% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CCOR Core Alternative ETF	0.99%	1.07%	1.18%	1.21%	1.11%	1.02%	1.50%	0.73%	1.53%	0.89%	0.00%	0.00%
QMNNX AQR Equity Market Neutral Fund Class N	1.34%	1.26%	6.06%	21.67%	5.77%	1.41%	17.64%	3.86%	0.49%	3.37%	1.19%	2.51%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CCOR and QMNNX in my portfolio?

CCOR and QMNNX have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CCOR or QMNNX?

CCOR has higher volatility (3.61%) compared to QMNNX (2.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCOR dropped -22.99% vs QMNNX's -39.22%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QMNNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.78 vs -0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.