RGS vs. LFVN
RGS (Regis Corporation) and LFVN (LifeVantage Corporation) are both stocks. RGS operates in Personal Services (Consumer Cyclical), while LFVN operates in Packaged Foods (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, RGS returned -20.06%/yr vs -6.04%/yr for LFVN. Their 0.10 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
RGS vs. LFVN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RGS achieves a -1.33% return, which is significantly lower than LFVN's 6.08% return. Over the past 10 years, RGS has underperformed LFVN with an annualized return of -20.06%, while LFVN has yielded a comparatively higher -6.04% annualized return.
RGS
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 1.03%
- 6M
- 21.37%
- YTD
- -1.33%
- 1Y
- 44.68%
- 3Y*
- -0.02%
- 5Y*
- -29.69%
- 10Y*
- -20.06%
- ALL TIME*
- -3.48%
LFVN
- 1D
- 2.23%
- 1M
- 3.38%
- 6M
- 23.29%
- YTD
- 6.08%
- 1Y
- -47.52%
- 3Y*
- 12.51%
- 5Y*
- -1.69%
- 10Y*
- -6.04%
- ALL TIME*
- -5.09%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $425.33K | $761.41K | $3.47M | |
| $177.25K | $165.72K | $196.25K |
RGS vs. LFVN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RGS Regis Corporation | -1.33% | 16.99% | 151.01% | -61.27% | -29.89% | -81.07% | -48.57% | 5.43% | 10.35% | 5.79% |
LFVN LifeVantage Corporation | 6.08% | -64.29% | 197.21% | 74.03% | -39.78% | -32.19% | -40.29% | 18.35% | 177.10% | -41.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between RGS and LFVN is 0.09, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.11 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 5, 2004 | 0.10 |
Fundamentals
RGS:
$68.42M
LFVN:
$81.12M
RGS:
$39.69
LFVN:
$0.45
RGS:
0.69
LFVN:
14.29
RGS:
0.00
LFVN:
0.35
RGS:
0.34
LFVN:
0.42
RGS:
0.41
LFVN:
2.44
RGS:
$228.88M
LFVN:
$195.32M
RGS:
$138.74M
LFVN:
$152.62M
RGS:
$22.14M
LFVN:
$8.69M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RGS vs. LFVN — Risk / Return Rank
RGS
LFVN
RGS vs. LFVN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Regis Corporation (RGS) and LifeVantage Corporation (LFVN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RGS | LFVN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 0.92 | +0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.27 | -0.66 | +1.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.20 | -0.90 | +4.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RGS vs. LFVN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RGS drawdown since its inception was -99.52%, roughly equal to the maximum LFVN drawdown of -99.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGS and LFVN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RGS | LFVN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.52% | -99.57% | +0.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.77% | -71.73% | +34.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -83.79% | -83.90% | +0.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -97.36% | -83.90% | -13.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.10% | -83.90% | -15.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -96.82% | -93.40% | -3.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.97% | -89.59% | +41.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.54% | 52.57% | -38.03% |
Volatility
RGS vs. LFVN - Volatility Comparison
Regis Corporation (RGS) has a higher volatility of 9.60% compared to LifeVantage Corporation (LFVN) at 6.56%. This indicates that RGS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LFVN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RGS | LFVN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.60% | 6.56% | +3.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.81% | 67.20% | -36.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.13% | 76.44% | -31.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 165.20% | 65.86% | +99.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 124.50% | 61.85% | +62.65% |
Dividends
RGS vs. LFVN - Dividend Comparison
RGS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LFVN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.88%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LFVN LifeVantage Corporation | 2.88% | 2.84% | 0.88% | 8.33% | 2.42% |
RGS Regis Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
RGS vs. LFVN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Regis Corporation and LifeVantage Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
RGS vs. LFVN - Profitability Comparison
RGS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Regis Corporation reported a gross profit of 48.79M and revenue of 52.41M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 93.1%.
LFVN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, LifeVantage Corporation reported a gross profit of 34.54M and revenue of 43.72M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 79.0%.
RGS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Regis Corporation reported an operating income of 5.72M and revenue of 52.41M, resulting in an operating margin of 10.9%.
LFVN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, LifeVantage Corporation reported an operating income of 1.68M and revenue of 43.72M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.8%.
RGS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Regis Corporation reported a net income of 735.00K and revenue of 52.41M, resulting in a net margin of 1.4%.
LFVN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, LifeVantage Corporation reported a net income of 1.36M and revenue of 43.72M, resulting in a net margin of 3.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
RGS and LFVN have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RGS has higher volatility (9.60%) compared to LFVN (6.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RGS dropped -99.52% vs LFVN's -99.57%.
RGS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.04 vs -0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RGS and LFVN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer