RGS vs. FOA

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

RGS (Regis Corporation) and FOA (Finance Of America Companies Inc.) are both stocks. RGS operates in Personal Services (Consumer Cyclical), while FOA operates in Credit Services (Financial Services). Over the past 5 years, RGS returned -32.88%/yr vs -22.82%/yr for FOA. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

RGS vs. FOA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Regis Corporation (RGS) and Finance Of America Companies Inc. (FOA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RGS achieves a -6.16% return, which is significantly higher than FOA's -11.32% return.

RGS

• 1D: -4.25%
• 1M: -9.58%
• YTD: -6.16%
• 6M: -7.19%
• 1Y: 24.00%
• 3Y*: 7.78%
• 5Y*: -32.88%
• 10Y*: -20.33%

FOA

• 1D: 2.92%
• 1M: 10.50%
• YTD: -11.32%
• 6M: -5.83%
• 1Y: -2.72%
• 3Y*: 3.44%
• 5Y*: -22.82%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RGS vs. FOA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
RGS Regis Corporation	-6.16%	16.99%	151.01%	-61.27%	-29.89%	-81.07%	-48.57%	-9.66%
FOA Finance Of America Companies Inc.	-11.32%	-13.90%	155.64%	-13.39%	-68.01%	-61.83%	3.69%	3.40%

Correlation

The correlation between RGS and FOA is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.15
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.13
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.15
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2019	0.13

Fundamentals

EPS RGS : $40.04 FOA : $4.39
PE Ratio RGS : 0.65 FOA : 4.89
PEG Ratio RGS : 0.00 FOA : 0.04
PS Ratio RGS : 0.32 FOA : 0.12
Total Revenue (TTM) RGS : $228.88M FOA : $1.15B
Gross Profit (TTM) RGS : $138.74M FOA : $623.72M
EBITDA (TTM) RGS : $22.14M FOA : $1.78B

Return for Risk

RGS vs. FOA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RGS

RGS Risk / Return Rank: 59
RGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
RGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
RGS Omega Ratio Rank: 57
RGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
RGS Martin Ratio Rank: 59

FOA

FOA Risk / Return Rank: 40
FOA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
FOA Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
FOA Omega Ratio Rank: 38
FOA Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
FOA Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RGS vs. FOA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Regis Corporation (RGS) and Finance Of America Companies Inc. (FOA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RGS	FOA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.53	-0.06	+0.58
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.13	0.26	+0.88
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	1.03	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.66	-0.06	+0.72
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.58	-0.11	+1.69

RGS vs. FOA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RGS Sharpe Ratio is 0.53, which is higher than the FOA Sharpe Ratio of -0.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RGS and FOA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RGS vs. FOA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RGS drawdown since its inception was -99.52%, roughly equal to the maximum FOA drawdown of -96.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGS and FOA.

Drawdown Indicators

	RGS	FOA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.52%	-96.13%	-3.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-36.77%	-45.07%	+8.30%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-84.96%	-77.83%	-7.13%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-97.83%	-94.26%	-3.57%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-99.10%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-96.97%	-81.52%	-15.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-47.83%	-57.56%	+9.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	15.24%	24.69%	-9.45%

Volatility

RGS vs. FOA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Regis Corporation (RGS) is 7.79%, while Finance Of America Companies Inc. (FOA) has a volatility of 10.13%. This indicates that RGS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FOA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RGS	FOA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.79%	10.13%	-2.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	31.68%	33.46%	-1.78%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	45.85%	46.99%	-1.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	165.33%	76.54%	+88.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	124.51%	65.31%	+59.20%

Dividends

RGS vs. FOA - Dividend Comparison

Neither RGS nor FOA has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RGS and FOA in my portfolio?

RGS and FOA have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RGS or FOA?

FOA has higher volatility (10.13%) compared to RGS (7.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RGS dropped -99.52% vs FOA's -96.13%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RGS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.53 vs -0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.