PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RGS vs. AIOS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RGS vs. AIOS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Regis Corporation (RGS) and AIOS Tech, Inc. (AIOS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RGS achieves a -2.27% return, which is significantly higher than AIOS's -32.52% return.


RGS

1D
-1.06%
1M
0.46%
YTD
-2.27%
6M
2.22%
1Y
21.78%
3Y*
7.22%
5Y*
-32.25%
10Y*
-20.07%

AIOS

1D
-9.07%
1M
-34.36%
YTD
-32.52%
6M
-78.95%
1Y
-81.77%
3Y*
-42.21%
5Y*
-64.10%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RGS vs. AIOS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RGS
Regis Corporation
-2.27%16.99%151.01%-61.27%-29.89%-81.07%-48.57%5.43%10.35%5.79%
AIOS
AIOS Tech, Inc.
-32.52%-84.05%67.75%-29.78%-82.26%-82.37%213.97%584.53%-67.78%-46.87%

Correlation

The correlation between RGS and AIOS is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 28, 2016

0.10

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RGS:

$77.67M

AIOS:

$3.35M

EPS

RGS:

$40.04

AIOS:

-$955.63

PS Ratio

RGS:

0.33

AIOS:

0.01

PB Ratio

RGS:

0.41

AIOS:

0.71

Total Revenue (TTM)

RGS:

$228.88M

AIOS:

$344.69M

Gross Profit (TTM)

RGS:

$138.74M

AIOS:

$33.75M

EBITDA (TTM)

RGS:

$22.14M

AIOS:

$9.69M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RGS vs. AIOS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RGS
RGS Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
RGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
RGS Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
RGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
RGS Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

AIOS
AIOS Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
AIOS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIOS Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIOS Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
AIOS Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIOS Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RGS vs. AIOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Regis Corporation (RGS) and AIOS Tech, Inc. (AIOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RGSAIOSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.47

-0.44

+0.91

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.06

-0.29

+1.35

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

0.96

+0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.67

-0.91

+1.58

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.64

-1.48

+3.11

RGS vs. AIOS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RGS Sharpe Ratio is 0.47, which is higher than the AIOS Sharpe Ratio of -0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RGS and AIOS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RGSAIOSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

-0.44

+0.91

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.20

-0.51

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.05

-0.33

+0.28

Drawdowns

RGS vs. AIOS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RGS drawdown since its inception was -99.52%, roughly equal to the maximum AIOS drawdown of -99.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGS and AIOS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RGSAIOSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.52%

-99.84%

+0.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.77%

-91.43%

+54.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-84.96%

-98.13%

+13.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-98.06%

-99.76%

+1.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-96.85%

-99.70%

+2.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-47.75%

-72.18%

+24.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.04%

56.46%

-41.42%

Volatility

RGS vs. AIOS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Regis Corporation (RGS) is 14.61%, while AIOS Tech, Inc. (AIOS) has a volatility of 54.21%. This indicates that RGS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AIOS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RGSAIOSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.61%

54.21%

-39.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.45%

159.42%

-126.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.41%

185.45%

-139.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

165.38%

126.43%

+38.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

124.50%

112.91%

+11.59%

Dividends

RGS vs. AIOS - Dividend Comparison

Neither RGS nor AIOS has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

RGS vs. AIOS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Regis Corporation and AIOS Tech, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-100.00M0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M20222023202420252026
52.41M
-85.83M
(RGS) Total Revenue
(AIOS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


RGS and AIOS have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AIOS has higher volatility (54.21%) compared to RGS (14.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RGS dropped -99.52% vs AIOS's -99.84%.

RGS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.47 vs -0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RGS and AIOS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer