PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RGLD vs. EQT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RGLD vs. EQT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Royal Gold, Inc. (RGLD) and EQT Corporation (EQT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RGLD achieves a -6.25% return, which is significantly lower than EQT's -2.55% return. Over the past 10 years, RGLD has outperformed EQT with an annualized return of 13.61%, while EQT has yielded a comparatively lower 3.39% annualized return.


RGLD

1D
1.47%
1M
-15.27%
YTD
-6.25%
6M
-4.74%
1Y
16.96%
3Y*
21.73%
5Y*
12.37%
10Y*
13.61%

EQT

1D
1.45%
1M
-7.13%
YTD
-2.55%
6M
-6.00%
1Y
-5.35%
3Y*
11.65%
5Y*
19.29%
10Y*
3.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RGLD vs. EQT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RGLD
Royal Gold, Inc.
-6.25%70.43%10.39%8.70%8.51%0.04%-12.13%44.27%5.53%31.32%
EQT
EQT Corporation
-2.55%17.64%21.41%16.20%57.64%71.60%17.27%-41.82%-38.82%-12.80%

Correlation

The correlation between RGLD and EQT is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 1990

0.13

The correlation between RGLD and EQT shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (1 year) to 0.16 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RGLD:

$17.65B

EQT:

$32.47B

EPS

RGLD:

$8.53

EQT:

$5.40

PE Ratio

RGLD:

24.34

EQT:

9.61

PEG Ratio

RGLD:

1.66

EQT:

0.08

PS Ratio

RGLD:

11.81

EQT:

3.21

PB Ratio

RGLD:

2.38

EQT:

1.29

Total Revenue (TTM)

RGLD:

$1.31B

EQT:

$10.03B

Gross Profit (TTM)

RGLD:

$579.68M

EQT:

$6.43B

EBITDA (TTM)

RGLD:

$949.59M

EQT:

$7.48B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RGLD vs. EQT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RGLD
RGLD Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
RGLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RGLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
RGLD Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
RGLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
RGLD Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

EQT
EQT Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
EQT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQT Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
EQT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQT Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RGLD vs. EQT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Royal Gold, Inc. (RGLD) and EQT Corporation (EQT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RGLDEQTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.00

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.48

-0.22

+0.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.27

-0.47

+1.74

RGLD vs. EQT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RGLD Sharpe Ratio is 0.43, which is higher than the EQT Sharpe Ratio of -0.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RGLD and EQT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RGLD vs. EQT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RGLD drawdown since its inception was -98.29%, which is greater than EQT's maximum drawdown of -91.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGLD and EQT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RGLDEQTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.29%

-91.51%

-6.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.12%

-24.42%

-10.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.12%

-31.62%

-3.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.73%

-42.56%

+1.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.55%

-88.28%

+38.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-31.66%

-23.32%

-8.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.82%

-23.34%

-6.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.34%

11.47%

+1.87%

Volatility

RGLD vs. EQT - Volatility Comparison

Royal Gold, Inc. (RGLD) has a higher volatility of 12.33% compared to EQT Corporation (EQT) at 8.36%. This indicates that RGLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EQT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RGLDEQTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.33%

8.36%

+3.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.22%

21.09%

+11.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.34%

32.56%

+6.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.58%

42.79%

-11.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.66%

48.90%

-15.24%

Dividends

RGLD vs. EQT - Dividend Comparison

RGLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, less than EQT's 1.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EQT
EQT Corporation
1.26%1.19%1.37%1.57%1.63%0.00%0.24%1.10%0.42%0.21%0.18%0.23%
RGLD
Royal Gold, Inc.
0.89%0.81%1.21%1.24%1.24%1.14%1.05%0.87%1.17%1.17%1.45%1.81%

Financials

RGLD vs. EQT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Royal Gold, Inc. and EQT Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B20222023202420252026
469.13M
3.38B
(RGLD) Total Revenue
(EQT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

RGLD vs. EQT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Royal Gold, Inc. and EQT Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%202220232024202520260
98.4%
Portfolio components
RGLD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Royal Gold, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 469.13M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

EQT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EQT Corporation reported a gross profit of 3.32B and revenue of 3.38B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 98.4%.

RGLD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Royal Gold, Inc. reported an operating income of 297.09M and revenue of 469.13M, resulting in an operating margin of 63.3%.

EQT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EQT Corporation reported an operating income of 2.04B and revenue of 3.38B, resulting in an operating margin of 60.3%.

RGLD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Royal Gold, Inc. reported a net income of 281.13M and revenue of 469.13M, resulting in a net margin of 59.9%.

EQT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EQT Corporation reported a net income of 1.55B and revenue of 3.38B, resulting in a net margin of 46.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


RGLD and EQT have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RGLD has higher volatility (12.33%) compared to EQT (8.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RGLD dropped -98.29% vs EQT's -91.51%.

RGLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.43 vs -0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RGLD and EQT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer