PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
RGLD vs. NEM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


RGLDNEM
YTD Return16.95%1.49%
1Y Return27.80%17.56%
3Y Return (Ann)10.82%-7.87%
5Y Return (Ann)5.19%5.11%
10Y Return (Ann)8.87%10.45%
Sharpe Ratio1.240.64
Sortino Ratio1.791.08
Omega Ratio1.221.15
Calmar Ratio1.150.39
Martin Ratio5.682.07
Ulcer Index5.91%11.63%
Daily Std Dev27.16%37.50%
Max Drawdown-96.43%-77.75%
Current Drawdown-9.45%-47.11%

Fundamentals


RGLDNEM
Market Cap$9.29B$48.19B
EPS$4.36-$2.15
PEG Ratio1.410.79
Total Revenue (TTM)$475.66M$16.84B
Gross Profit (TTM)$288.96M$3.84B
EBITDA (TTM)$376.07M$6.78B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.5

The correlation between RGLD and NEM is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

RGLD vs. NEM - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, RGLD achieves a 16.95% return, which is significantly higher than NEM's 1.49% return. Over the past 10 years, RGLD has underperformed NEM with an annualized return of 8.87%, while NEM has yielded a comparatively higher 10.45% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
7.70%
-3.50%
RGLD
NEM

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

RGLD vs. NEM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Royal Gold, Inc. (RGLD) and Newmont Goldcorp Corporation (NEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RGLD
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for RGLD, currently valued at 1.24, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.24
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for RGLD, currently valued at 1.79, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.79
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for RGLD, currently valued at 1.22, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.22
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for RGLD, currently valued at 1.15, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.15
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for RGLD, currently valued at 5.68, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.005.68
NEM
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for NEM, currently valued at 0.64, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.64
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for NEM, currently valued at 1.08, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.08
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for NEM, currently valued at 1.15, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.15
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for NEM, currently valued at 0.39, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.39
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for NEM, currently valued at 2.07, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.002.07

RGLD vs. NEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RGLD Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is higher than the NEM Sharpe Ratio of 0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RGLD and NEM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.24
0.64
RGLD
NEM

Dividends

RGLD vs. NEM - Dividend Comparison

RGLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, less than NEM's 2.79% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
RGLD
Royal Gold, Inc.
1.15%1.24%1.24%1.14%1.05%0.87%1.17%1.17%1.45%1.81%1.36%2.19%
NEM
Newmont Goldcorp Corporation
2.79%3.87%4.66%3.55%1.74%3.31%1.62%0.67%0.37%0.56%1.19%5.32%

Drawdowns

RGLD vs. NEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RGLD drawdown since its inception was -96.43%, which is greater than NEM's maximum drawdown of -77.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGLD and NEM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-9.45%
-47.11%
RGLD
NEM

Volatility

RGLD vs. NEM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Royal Gold, Inc. (RGLD) is 8.45%, while Newmont Goldcorp Corporation (NEM) has a volatility of 17.66%. This indicates that RGLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
8.45%
17.66%
RGLD
NEM

Financials

RGLD vs. NEM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Royal Gold, Inc. and Newmont Goldcorp Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items