RGLD vs. NEM
Compare and contrast key facts about Royal Gold, Inc. (RGLD) and Newmont Goldcorp Corporation (NEM).
Performance
RGLD vs. NEM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RGLD vs. NEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RGLD Royal Gold, Inc. | 14.73% | 70.43% | 10.39% | 8.70% | 8.51% | 0.04% | -12.13% | 44.27% | 5.53% | 31.32% |
NEM Newmont Goldcorp Corporation | 8.63% | 172.82% | -7.83% | -8.76% | -20.77% | 7.40% | 40.28% | 30.52% | -6.15% | 10.91% |
Fundamentals
RGLD:
$8.08
NEM:
$7.91
RGLD:
31.51
NEM:
13.69
RGLD:
2.14
NEM:
0.36
RGLD:
17.51
NEM:
5.15
RGLD:
$1.03B
NEM:
$15.51B
RGLD:
$504.63M
NEM:
$7.14B
RGLD:
$742.55M
NEM:
$13.38B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RGLD achieves a 14.73% return, which is significantly higher than NEM's 8.63% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with RGLD having a 18.65% annualized return and NEM not far behind at 17.90%.
RGLD
- 1D
- 6.59%
- 1M
- -15.11%
- YTD
- 14.73%
- 6M
- 27.44%
- 1Y
- 57.14%
- 3Y*
- 26.67%
- 5Y*
- 19.30%
- 10Y*
- 18.65%
NEM
- 1D
- 4.97%
- 1M
- -16.56%
- YTD
- 8.63%
- 6M
- 29.03%
- 1Y
- 127.13%
- 3Y*
- 33.46%
- 5Y*
- 15.27%
- 10Y*
- 17.90%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RGLD vs. NEM — Risk / Return Rank
RGLD
NEM
RGLD vs. NEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Royal Gold, Inc. (RGLD) and Newmont Goldcorp Corporation (NEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RGLD | NEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.45 | 2.78 | -1.32 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.88 | 2.89 | -1.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.42 | -0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.00 | 4.70 | -2.70 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.42 | 15.66 | -9.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RGLD | NEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.45 | 2.78 | -1.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 | 0.42 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | 0.50 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.18 | 0.13 | +0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between RGLD and NEM is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
RGLD vs. NEM - Dividend Comparison
RGLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%, less than NEM's 0.93% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RGLD Royal Gold, Inc. | 0.72% | 0.81% | 1.21% | 1.24% | 1.24% | 1.14% | 1.05% | 0.87% | 1.17% | 1.17% | 1.45% | 1.81% |
NEM Newmont Goldcorp Corporation | 0.93% | 1.00% | 2.69% | 3.87% | 4.66% | 3.55% | 1.74% | 3.31% | 1.62% | 0.67% | 0.37% | 0.56% |
Drawdowns
RGLD vs. NEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RGLD drawdown since its inception was -98.29%, which is greater than NEM's maximum drawdown of -81.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGLD and NEM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RGLD | NEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.29% | -81.30% | -16.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.27% | -27.25% | -2.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.73% | -62.40% | +21.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.55% | -62.40% | +12.85% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.37% | -17.80% | +1.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.87% | -41.50% | +11.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.10% | 8.18% | +0.92% |
Volatility
RGLD vs. NEM - Volatility Comparison
Royal Gold, Inc. (RGLD) has a higher volatility of 16.92% compared to Newmont Goldcorp Corporation (NEM) at 15.18%. This indicates that RGLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RGLD | NEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.92% | 15.18% | +1.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.30% | 37.47% | -5.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.50% | 46.03% | -6.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.04% | 36.87% | -5.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.83% | 35.65% | -1.82% |
Financials
RGLD vs. NEM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Royal Gold, Inc. and Newmont Goldcorp Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities