RGLD vs. NEM

In the year-to-date period, RGLD achieves a 36.48% return, which is significantly lower than NEM's 45.78% return. Over the past 10 years, RGLD has outperformed NEM with an annualized return of 12.06%, while NEM has yielded a comparatively lower 9.96% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Royal Gold, Inc. (RGLD) and Newmont Goldcorp Corporation (NEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current RGLD Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is higher than the NEM Sharpe Ratio of 1.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RGLD and NEM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

RGLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, less than NEM's 1.85% yield.

The maximum RGLD drawdown since its inception was -96.43%, which is greater than NEM's maximum drawdown of -77.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGLD and NEM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Royal Gold, Inc. (RGLD) is 12.21%, while Newmont Goldcorp Corporation (NEM) has a volatility of 16.95%. This indicates that RGLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Royal Gold, Inc. and Newmont Goldcorp Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.