RGLD vs. FNV
RGLD (Royal Gold, Inc.) and FNV (Franco-Nevada Corporation) are both stocks. Both operate in the Gold industry within the Basic Materials sector. Over the past 10 years, RGLD returned 12.86%/yr vs 12.65%/yr for FNV. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
RGLD vs. FNV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RGLD achieves a -6.69% return, which is significantly lower than FNV's 3.59% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with RGLD having a 12.86% annualized return and FNV not far behind at 12.65%.
RGLD
- 1D
- -3.75%
- 1M
- -6.21%
- YTD
- -6.69%
- 6M
- -11.06%
- 1Y
- 13.85%
- 3Y*
- 23.32%
- 5Y*
- 14.37%
- 10Y*
- 12.86%
FNV
- 1D
- -3.09%
- 1M
- -5.22%
- YTD
- 3.59%
- 6M
- -0.52%
- 1Y
- 28.87%
- 3Y*
- 16.58%
- 5Y*
- 9.10%
- 10Y*
- 12.65%
RGLD vs. FNV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RGLD Royal Gold, Inc. | -6.69% | 70.43% | 10.39% | 8.70% | 8.51% | 0.04% | -12.13% | 44.27% | 5.53% | 31.32% |
FNV Franco-Nevada Corporation | 3.59% | 77.81% | 7.41% | -17.96% | -0.39% | 11.57% | 22.31% | 48.92% | -11.00% | 35.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between RGLD and FNV is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2007 | 0.68 |
The correlation between RGLD and FNV shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (all time) to 0.80 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
RGLD:
$17.57B
FNV:
$41.33B
RGLD:
$8.53
FNV:
$7.10
RGLD:
24.23
FNV:
30.13
RGLD:
1.65
FNV:
0.63
RGLD:
11.76
FNV:
19.63
RGLD:
2.37
FNV:
5.08
RGLD:
$1.31B
FNV:
$2.10B
RGLD:
$579.68M
FNV:
$1.61B
RGLD:
$949.59M
FNV:
$1.96B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RGLD vs. FNV — Risk / Return Rank
RGLD
FNV
RGLD vs. FNV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Royal Gold, Inc. (RGLD) and Franco-Nevada Corporation (FNV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RGLD | FNV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.16 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.40 | 1.13 | -0.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.00 | 2.72 | -1.73 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RGLD vs. FNV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RGLD drawdown since its inception was -98.29%, which is greater than FNV's maximum drawdown of -58.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGLD and FNV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RGLD | FNV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.29% | -58.76% | -39.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.12% | -25.68% | -9.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.12% | -29.64% | -5.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.73% | -37.12% | -3.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.55% | -37.12% | -12.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.98% | -23.54% | -8.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.82% | -13.98% | -15.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.08% | 10.67% | +3.41% |
Volatility
RGLD vs. FNV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Royal Gold, Inc. (RGLD) is 12.57%, while Franco-Nevada Corporation (FNV) has a volatility of 13.78%. This indicates that RGLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RGLD | FNV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.57% | 13.78% | -1.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.47% | 30.94% | +1.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.72% | 36.78% | +2.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.58% | 30.54% | +1.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.67% | 30.22% | +3.45% |
Dividends
RGLD vs. FNV - Dividend Comparison
RGLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, more than FNV's 0.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNV Franco-Nevada Corporation | 0.77% | 0.73% | 1.22% | 1.23% | 0.94% | 1.10% | 0.82% | 0.96% | 1.35% | 1.14% | 1.46% | 1.81% |
RGLD Royal Gold, Inc. | 0.90% | 0.81% | 1.21% | 1.24% | 1.24% | 1.14% | 1.05% | 0.87% | 1.17% | 1.17% | 1.45% | 1.81% |
Financials
RGLD vs. FNV - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Royal Gold, Inc. and Franco-Nevada Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
RGLD vs. FNV - Profitability Comparison
RGLD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Royal Gold, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 469.13M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
FNV - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Franco-Nevada Corporation reported a gross profit of 518.42M and revenue of 641.09M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 80.9%.
RGLD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Royal Gold, Inc. reported an operating income of 297.09M and revenue of 469.13M, resulting in an operating margin of 63.3%.
FNV - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Franco-Nevada Corporation reported an operating income of 503.23M and revenue of 641.09M, resulting in an operating margin of 78.5%.
RGLD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Royal Gold, Inc. reported a net income of 281.13M and revenue of 469.13M, resulting in a net margin of 59.9%.
FNV - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Franco-Nevada Corporation reported a net income of 462.11M and revenue of 641.09M, resulting in a net margin of 72.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
RGLD and FNV have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FNV has higher volatility (13.78%) compared to RGLD (12.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RGLD dropped -98.29% vs FNV's -58.76%.
FNV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.79 vs 0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RGLD and FNV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer