REG vs. IMMR
REG (Regency Centers Corporation) and IMMR (Immersion Corporation) are both stocks. REG operates in REIT - Retail (Real Estate), while IMMR operates in Software - Application (Technology). Over the past 10 years, REG returned 4.12%/yr vs 1.36%/yr for IMMR. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
REG vs. IMMR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, REG achieves a 18.54% return, which is significantly higher than IMMR's -1.57% return. Over the past 10 years, REG has outperformed IMMR with an annualized return of 4.12%, while IMMR has yielded a comparatively lower 1.36% annualized return.
REG
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- 6.55%
- YTD
- 18.54%
- 6M
- 22.12%
- 1Y
- 18.96%
- 3Y*
- 14.45%
- 5Y*
- 7.74%
- 10Y*
- 4.12%
IMMR
- 1D
- -1.51%
- 1M
- 6.34%
- YTD
- -1.57%
- 6M
- -3.13%
- 1Y
- -11.15%
- 3Y*
- -2.27%
- 5Y*
- -3.44%
- 10Y*
- 1.36%
REG vs. IMMR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
REG Regency Centers Corporation | 18.54% | -2.78% | 14.90% | 11.85% | -13.59% | 71.41% | -23.86% | 11.43% | -12.00% | 3.62% |
IMMR Immersion Corporation | -1.57% | -18.30% | 26.47% | 3.43% | 23.12% | -49.42% | 51.95% | -17.08% | 26.91% | -33.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between REG and IMMR is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 12, 1999 | 0.21 |
The correlation between REG and IMMR shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (1 year) to 0.22 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
REG:
$1.70B
IMMR:
$1.47B
REG:
$814.76M
IMMR:
$409.86M
REG:
$1.12B
IMMR:
$188.76M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
REG vs. IMMR — Risk / Return Rank
REG
IMMR
REG vs. IMMR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Regency Centers Corporation (REG) and Immersion Corporation (IMMR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| REG | IMMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 0.98 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.16 | -0.37 | +2.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.27 | -0.68 | +5.95 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
REG vs. IMMR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum REG drawdown since its inception was -73.37%, smaller than the maximum IMMR drawdown of -98.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REG and IMMR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| REG | IMMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.37% | -98.66% | +25.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.17% | -30.86% | +22.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.10% | -56.90% | +41.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.09% | -56.90% | +26.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.02% | -74.29% | +17.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.10% | -89.85% | +89.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.17% | -88.20% | +72.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.35% | 16.89% | -13.54% |
Volatility
REG vs. IMMR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Regency Centers Corporation (REG) is 4.45%, while Immersion Corporation (IMMR) has a volatility of 12.99%. This indicates that REG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IMMR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| REG | IMMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.45% | 12.99% | -8.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.10% | 27.57% | -16.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.90% | 39.99% | -24.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.39% | 45.85% | -23.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.88% | 51.32% | -21.44% |
Dividends
REG vs. IMMR - Dividend Comparison
REG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.70%, which matches IMMR's 3.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMMR Immersion Corporation | 3.67% | 5.59% | 2.06% | 3.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
REG Regency Centers Corporation | 3.70% | 4.16% | 3.67% | 3.91% | 4.04% | 3.20% | 5.22% | 3.71% | 3.78% | 3.04% | 2.90% | 2.85% |
Financials
REG vs. IMMR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Regency Centers Corporation and Immersion Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
REG and IMMR have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IMMR has higher volatility (12.99%) compared to REG (4.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REG dropped -73.37% vs IMMR's -98.66%.
REG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.11 vs -0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for REG and IMMR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer