IMMR vs. FKWL
IMMR (Immersion Corporation) and FKWL (Franklin Wireless Corp.) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — IMMR in Software - Application, FKWL in Communication Equipment. Over the past 10 years, IMMR returned 1.45%/yr vs -0.64%/yr for FKWL. Their 0.06 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
IMMR vs. FKWL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IMMR achieves a 15.09% return, which is significantly higher than FKWL's -47.83% return. Over the past 10 years, IMMR has outperformed FKWL with an annualized return of 1.45%, while FKWL has yielded a comparatively lower -0.64% annualized return.
IMMR
- 1D
- 2.09%
- 1M
- 12.78%
- 6M
- 15.12%
- YTD
- 15.09%
- 1Y
- 15.67%
- 3Y*
- 6.20%
- 5Y*
- 2.72%
- 10Y*
- 1.45%
- ALL TIME*
- -2.58%
FKWL
- 1D
- -1.51%
- 1M
- -10.24%
- 6M
- -44.53%
- YTD
- -47.83%
- 1Y
- -40.93%
- 3Y*
- -12.50%
- 5Y*
- -23.81%
- 10Y*
- -0.64%
- ALL TIME*
- 38.19%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $56.99K | $64.46K | $97.91K | |
| $6.30M | $4.82M | $4.30M |
IMMR vs. FKWL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMMR Immersion Corporation | 15.09% | -18.30% | 26.47% | 3.43% | 23.12% | -49.42% | 51.95% | -17.08% | 26.91% | -33.58% |
FKWL Franklin Wireless Corp. | -47.83% | -10.12% | 44.54% | -23.99% | 2.06% | -81.40% | 883.26% | 5.29% | 10.73% | -28.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between IMMR and FKWL is 0.01, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.15 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 27, 2002 | 0.06 |
The correlation between IMMR and FKWL shifts across timeframes, from 0.01 (1 year) to 0.15 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
IMMR:
$250.93M
FKWL:
$26.87M
IMMR:
$0.14
FKWL:
$0.11
IMMR:
55.32
FKWL:
21.58
IMMR:
0.64
FKWL:
0.11
IMMR:
0.14
FKWL:
0.57
IMMR:
$1.73B
FKWL:
$31.60M
IMMR:
$360.34M
FKWL:
$6.19M
IMMR:
$78.13M
FKWL:
$875.46K
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IMMR vs. FKWL — Risk / Return Rank
IMMR
FKWL
IMMR vs. FKWL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Immersion Corporation (IMMR) and Franklin Wireless Corp. (FKWL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IMMR | FKWL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 0.80 | +0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.53 | -0.74 | +1.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.20 | -1.47 | +2.68 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IMMR vs. FKWL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IMMR drawdown since its inception was -98.66%, roughly equal to the maximum FKWL drawdown of -97.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMMR and FKWL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IMMR | FKWL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.66% | -97.14% | -1.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.77% | -55.64% | +30.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -56.90% | -66.89% | +9.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.90% | -74.55% | +17.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -74.29% | -90.97% | +16.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -88.14% | -90.97% | +2.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -88.21% | -55.41% | -32.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.86% | 27.80% | -16.94% |
Volatility
IMMR vs. FKWL - Volatility Comparison
Immersion Corporation (IMMR) has a higher volatility of 19.94% compared to Franklin Wireless Corp. (FKWL) at 7.09%. This indicates that IMMR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FKWL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IMMR | FKWL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.94% | 7.09% | +12.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.97% | 24.26% | +8.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.91% | 34.93% | +8.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.41% | 44.90% | +1.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.27% | 53.76% | -2.49% |
Dividends
IMMR vs. FKWL - Dividend Comparison
IMMR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.57%, more than FKWL's 1.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FKWL Franklin Wireless Corp. | 1.75% | 0.92% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IMMR Immersion Corporation | 3.57% | 5.59% | 2.06% | 3.12% |
Financials
IMMR vs. FKWL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Immersion Corporation and Franklin Wireless Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
IMMR vs. FKWL - Profitability Comparison
IMMR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Immersion Corporation reported a gross profit of 73.93M and revenue of 270.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.4%.
FKWL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Franklin Wireless Corp. reported a gross profit of 16.10 and revenue of 100.00. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 16.1%.
IMMR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Immersion Corporation reported an operating income of 147.00K and revenue of 270.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.1%.
FKWL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Franklin Wireless Corp. reported an operating income of -43.90 and revenue of 100.00, resulting in an operating margin of -43.9%.
IMMR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Immersion Corporation reported a net income of 3.73M and revenue of 270.00M, resulting in a net margin of 1.4%.
FKWL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Franklin Wireless Corp. reported a net income of -45.20 and revenue of 100.00, resulting in a net margin of -45.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
IMMR and FKWL have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IMMR has higher volatility (19.94%) compared to FKWL (7.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMMR dropped -98.66% vs FKWL's -97.14%.
IMMR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.30 vs -1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IMMR and FKWL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer