REG vs. CPT
Compare and contrast key facts about Regency Centers Corporation (REG) and Camden Property Trust (CPT).
Performance
REG vs. CPT - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
REG vs. CPT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
REG Regency Centers Corporation | 10.67% | -2.78% | 14.90% | 11.85% | -13.59% | 71.41% | -23.86% | 11.43% | -12.00% | 3.62% |
CPT Camden Property Trust | -10.31% | -1.48% | 21.31% | -7.64% | -35.58% | 83.40% | -2.28% | 24.21% | -0.98% | 13.33% |
Fundamentals
REG:
$13.85B
CPT:
$10.61B
REG:
$3.45
CPT:
$3.53
REG:
21.92
CPT:
27.65
REG:
0.13
CPT:
0.78
REG:
8.20
CPT:
8.99
REG:
2.07
CPT:
2.43
REG:
$1.68B
CPT:
$1.18B
REG:
$1.02B
CPT:
$723.23M
REG:
$1.07B
CPT:
$1.11B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, REG achieves a 10.67% return, which is significantly higher than CPT's -10.31% return. Over the past 10 years, REG has underperformed CPT with an annualized return of 3.99%, while CPT has yielded a comparatively higher 5.60% annualized return.
REG
- 1D
- 1.03%
- 1M
- -3.29%
- YTD
- 10.67%
- 6M
- 5.98%
- 1Y
- 6.81%
- 3Y*
- 11.79%
- 5Y*
- 9.91%
- 10Y*
- 3.99%
CPT
- 1D
- 0.91%
- 1M
- -8.87%
- YTD
- -10.31%
- 6M
- -6.61%
- 1Y
- -16.88%
- 3Y*
- 1.52%
- 5Y*
- 0.81%
- 10Y*
- 5.60%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
REG vs. CPT — Risk / Return Rank
REG
CPT
REG vs. CPT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Regency Centers Corporation (REG) and Camden Property Trust (CPT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| REG | CPT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.37 | -0.78 | +1.15 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.66 | -0.99 | +1.65 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 0.88 | +0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.66 | -0.85 | +1.51 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.01 | -1.49 | +3.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| REG | CPT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 | -0.78 | +1.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | 0.04 | +0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.13 | 0.23 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 0.37 | -0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between REG and CPT is 0.58, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
REG vs. CPT - Dividend Comparison
REG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.86%, less than CPT's 4.31% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
REG Regency Centers Corporation | 3.86% | 4.16% | 3.67% | 3.91% | 4.04% | 3.20% | 5.22% | 3.71% | 3.78% | 3.04% | 2.90% | 2.85% |
CPT Camden Property Trust | 4.31% | 3.82% | 3.55% | 4.03% | 3.36% | 1.93% | 3.32% | 3.02% | 3.50% | 3.26% | 8.62% | 3.65% |
Drawdowns
REG vs. CPT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum REG drawdown since its inception was -73.37%, roughly equal to the maximum CPT drawdown of -75.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REG and CPT.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| REG | CPT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.37% | -75.31% | +1.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.39% | -19.00% | +6.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.09% | -50.22% | +20.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.02% | -50.22% | -6.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.22% | -36.22% | +32.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.25% | -12.80% | -3.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.03% | 10.82% | -6.79% |
Volatility
REG vs. CPT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Regency Centers Corporation (REG) is 3.71%, while Camden Property Trust (CPT) has a volatility of 4.67%. This indicates that REG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CPT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| REG | CPT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.71% | 4.67% | -0.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.20% | 13.60% | -2.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.55% | 21.80% | -3.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.52% | 22.56% | -0.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.89% | 24.33% | +5.56% |
Financials
REG vs. CPT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Regency Centers Corporation and Camden Property Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities