PortfoliosLab logo
REG vs. CPT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between REG and CPT is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

REG vs. CPT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Regency Centers Corporation (REG) and Camden Property Trust (CPT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

REG:

1.26

CPT:

0.94

Sortino Ratio

REG:

1.92

CPT:

1.34

Omega Ratio

REG:

1.25

CPT:

1.17

Calmar Ratio

REG:

1.59

CPT:

0.50

Martin Ratio

REG:

6.42

CPT:

3.43

Ulcer Index

REG:

4.26%

CPT:

5.79%

Daily Std Dev

REG:

19.99%

CPT:

22.00%

Max Drawdown

REG:

-73.38%

CPT:

-75.31%

Current Drawdown

REG:

-6.29%

CPT:

-26.29%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

REG:

$13.22B

CPT:

$12.55B

EPS

REG:

$2.10

CPT:

$1.09

PE Ratio

REG:

34.36

CPT:

107.79

PEG Ratio

REG:

2.87

CPT:

8.96

PS Ratio

REG:

8.68

CPT:

8.03

PB Ratio

REG:

2.03

CPT:

2.72

Total Revenue (TTM)

REG:

$1.47B

CPT:

$1.55B

Gross Profit (TTM)

REG:

$734.95M

CPT:

$950.33M

EBITDA (TTM)

REG:

$1.08B

CPT:

$845.96M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, REG achieves a -1.47% return, which is significantly lower than CPT's 2.13% return. Over the past 10 years, REG has underperformed CPT with an annualized return of 5.09%, while CPT has yielded a comparatively higher 8.74% annualized return.


REG

YTD

-1.47%

1M

-0.37%

6M

-2.72%

1Y

22.20%

3Y*

6.19%

5Y*

15.46%

10Y*

5.09%

CPT

YTD

2.13%

1M

2.32%

6M

-4.97%

1Y

18.55%

3Y*

-2.99%

5Y*

8.65%

10Y*

8.74%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Regency Centers Corporation

Camden Property Trust

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

REG vs. CPT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

REG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of REG is 8686
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of REG is 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of REG is 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of REG is 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of REG is 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of REG is 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

CPT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CPT is 7575
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CPT is 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CPT is 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CPT is 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CPT is 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CPT is 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

REG vs. CPT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Regency Centers Corporation (REG) and Camden Property Trust (CPT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current REG Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is higher than the CPT Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of REG and CPT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

REG vs. CPT - Dividend Comparison

REG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.81%, more than CPT's 3.52% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
REG
Regency Centers Corporation
3.81%3.67%3.91%4.04%3.20%5.22%3.71%3.78%3.04%2.90%2.85%2.95%
CPT
Camden Property Trust
3.52%3.55%4.03%3.36%1.86%3.32%3.02%3.50%3.26%8.62%3.65%3.58%

Drawdowns

REG vs. CPT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REG drawdown since its inception was -73.38%, roughly equal to the maximum CPT drawdown of -75.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REG and CPT.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

REG vs. CPT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Regency Centers Corporation (REG) is 5.03%, while Camden Property Trust (CPT) has a volatility of 7.66%. This indicates that REG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CPT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

REG vs. CPT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Regency Centers Corporation and Camden Property Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


250.00M300.00M350.00M400.00M20212022202320242025
380.76M
390.57M
(REG) Total Revenue
(CPT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

REG vs. CPT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Regency Centers Corporation and Camden Property Trust over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20212022202320242025
44.7%
61.6%
(REG) Gross Margin
(CPT) Gross Margin
REG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Regency Centers Corporation reported a gross profit of 170.09M and revenue of 380.76M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.7%.

CPT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Camden Property Trust reported a gross profit of 240.58M and revenue of 390.57M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.6%.

REG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Regency Centers Corporation reported an operating income of 145.67M and revenue of 380.76M, resulting in an operating margin of 38.3%.

CPT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Camden Property Trust reported an operating income of 75.11M and revenue of 390.57M, resulting in an operating margin of 19.2%.

REG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Regency Centers Corporation reported a net income of 109.59M and revenue of 380.76M, resulting in a net margin of 28.8%.

CPT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Camden Property Trust reported a net income of 38.82M and revenue of 390.57M, resulting in a net margin of 9.9%.