REG vs. CPT
REG (Regency Centers Corporation) and CPT (Camden Property Trust) are both stocks. Both are in the Real Estate sector — REG in REIT - Retail, CPT in REIT - Residential. Over the past 10 years, REG returned 3.83%/yr vs 6.68%/yr for CPT. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
REG vs. CPT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, REG achieves a 14.23% return, which is significantly higher than CPT's 0.09% return. Over the past 10 years, REG has underperformed CPT with an annualized return of 3.83%, while CPT has yielded a comparatively higher 6.68% annualized return.
REG
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- -0.95%
- YTD
- 14.23%
- 6M
- 14.10%
- 1Y
- 13.20%
- 3Y*
- 14.59%
- 5Y*
- 7.85%
- 10Y*
- 3.83%
CPT
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 1.41%
- YTD
- 0.09%
- 6M
- 1.52%
- 1Y
- -1.86%
- 3Y*
- 4.96%
- 5Y*
- -0.90%
- 10Y*
- 6.68%
REG vs. CPT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
REG Regency Centers Corporation | 14.23% | -2.78% | 14.90% | 11.85% | -13.59% | 71.41% | -23.86% | 11.43% | -12.00% | 3.62% |
CPT Camden Property Trust | 0.09% | -1.48% | 21.31% | -7.64% | -35.58% | 83.40% | -2.28% | 24.21% | -0.98% | 13.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between REG and CPT is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 1993 | 0.58 |
The correlation between REG and CPT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
REG:
$14.19B
CPT:
$11.43B
REG:
$3.55
CPT:
$3.60
REG:
21.79
CPT:
30.29
REG:
2.13
CPT:
0.85
REG:
8.31
CPT:
9.94
REG:
2.13
CPT:
2.84
REG:
$1.70B
CPT:
$1.18B
REG:
$814.76M
CPT:
$725.73M
REG:
$1.12B
CPT:
$1.12B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
REG vs. CPT — Risk / Return Rank
REG
CPT
REG vs. CPT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Regency Centers Corporation (REG) and Camden Property Trust (CPT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| REG | CPT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.00 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.62 | -0.13 | +1.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.92 | -0.25 | +4.17 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
REG vs. CPT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum REG drawdown since its inception was -73.37%, roughly equal to the maximum CPT drawdown of -75.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REG and CPT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| REG | CPT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.37% | -75.31% | +1.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.17% | -14.81% | +6.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.10% | -24.87% | +9.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.09% | -50.22% | +20.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.02% | -50.22% | -6.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.73% | -28.83% | +25.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.16% | -12.92% | -3.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.38% | 7.41% | -4.03% |
Volatility
REG vs. CPT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Regency Centers Corporation (REG) is 4.85%, while Camden Property Trust (CPT) has a volatility of 5.98%. This indicates that REG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CPT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| REG | CPT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.85% | 5.98% | -1.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.09% | 14.26% | -3.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.07% | 19.59% | -3.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.34% | 22.72% | -0.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.90% | 24.40% | +5.50% |
Dividends
REG vs. CPT - Dividend Comparison
REG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.84%, which matches CPT's 3.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CPT Camden Property Trust | 3.86% | 3.82% | 3.55% | 4.03% | 3.36% | 1.93% | 3.32% | 3.02% | 3.50% | 3.26% | 8.62% | 3.65% |
REG Regency Centers Corporation | 3.84% | 4.16% | 3.67% | 3.91% | 4.04% | 3.20% | 5.22% | 3.71% | 3.78% | 3.04% | 2.90% | 2.85% |
Financials
REG vs. CPT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Regency Centers Corporation and Camden Property Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
REG and CPT have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CPT has higher volatility (5.98%) compared to REG (4.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REG dropped -73.37% vs CPT's -75.31%.
REG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.83 vs -0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for REG and CPT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer