PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IMMR vs. IPAR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

IMMR vs. IPAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Immersion Corporation (IMMR) and Inter Parfums, Inc. (IPAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMMR achieves a 4.00% return, which is significantly lower than IPAR's 9.11% return. Over the past 10 years, IMMR has underperformed IPAR with an annualized return of 1.83%, while IPAR has yielded a comparatively higher 14.07% annualized return.


IMMR

1D
2.83%
1M
8.82%
YTD
4.00%
6M
4.62%
1Y
-3.60%
3Y*
1.13%
5Y*
-2.06%
10Y*
1.83%

IPAR

1D
-0.70%
1M
0.02%
YTD
9.11%
6M
15.72%
1Y
-30.54%
3Y*
-9.11%
5Y*
6.14%
10Y*
14.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IMMR vs. IPAR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IMMR
Immersion Corporation
4.00%-18.30%26.47%3.43%23.12%-49.42%51.95%-17.08%26.91%-33.58%
IPAR
Inter Parfums, Inc.
9.11%-33.59%-6.45%52.00%-7.40%79.01%-16.23%12.74%53.32%35.12%

Correlation

The correlation between IMMR and IPAR is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 15, 1999

0.23

Fundamentals

Total Revenue (TTM)

IMMR:

$1.47B

IPAR:

$1.49B

Gross Profit (TTM)

IMMR:

$409.86M

IPAR:

$955.88M

EBITDA (TTM)

IMMR:

$188.76M

IPAR:

$291.43M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IMMR vs. IPAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IMMR
IMMR Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
IMMR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMMR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMMR Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
IMMR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMMR Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

IPAR
IPAR Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
IPAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IPAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
IPAR Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
IPAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
IPAR Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IMMR vs. IPAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Immersion Corporation (IMMR) and Inter Parfums, Inc. (IPAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IMMRIPARDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.09

-1.07

+0.98

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.15

-1.45

+1.60

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

0.83

+0.19

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.15

-0.71

+0.55

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.29

-1.04

+0.76

IMMR vs. IPAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMMR Sharpe Ratio is -0.09, which is higher than the IPAR Sharpe Ratio of -1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMMR and IPAR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IMMRIPARDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.09

-1.07

+0.98

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.05

0.19

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.04

0.38

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.04

0.30

-0.34

Drawdowns

IMMR vs. IPAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMMR drawdown since its inception was -98.66%, which is greater than IPAR's maximum drawdown of -81.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMMR and IPAR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IMMRIPARDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.66%

-81.82%

-16.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.86%

-43.01%

+12.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-56.90%

-46.41%

-10.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.90%

-46.51%

-10.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-74.29%

-54.94%

-19.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-89.28%

-37.19%

-52.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-88.21%

-28.43%

-59.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.64%

29.29%

-12.65%

Volatility

IMMR vs. IPAR - Volatility Comparison

Immersion Corporation (IMMR) and Inter Parfums, Inc. (IPAR) have volatilities of 9.55% and 9.87%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IMMRIPARDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.55%

9.87%

-0.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.35%

19.53%

+6.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.93%

28.66%

+10.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

45.66%

33.36%

+12.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

51.26%

36.84%

+14.42%

Dividends

IMMR vs. IPAR - Dividend Comparison

IMMR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.47%, which matches IPAR's 3.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IMMR
Immersion Corporation
3.47%5.59%2.06%3.12%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IPAR
Inter Parfums, Inc.
3.49%3.77%2.28%1.74%2.07%0.94%0.55%1.59%1.38%1.66%1.89%2.18%

Financials

IMMR vs. IPAR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Immersion Corporation and Inter Parfums, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M600.00M20222023202420252026
281.38M
344.89M
(IMMR) Total Revenue
(IPAR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


IMMR and IPAR have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IPAR has higher volatility (9.87%) compared to IMMR (9.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMMR dropped -98.66% vs IPAR's -81.82%.

IMMR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.09 vs -1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IMMR and IPAR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer