PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
IMMR vs. GCT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between IMMR and GCT is 0.10, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.1

Performance

IMMR vs. GCT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Immersion Corporation (IMMR) and GigaCloud Technology Inc (GCT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-4.83%
-9.16%
IMMR
GCT

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

IMMR:

0.68

GCT:

-0.46

Sortino Ratio

IMMR:

1.20

GCT:

-0.21

Omega Ratio

IMMR:

1.15

GCT:

0.98

Calmar Ratio

IMMR:

0.32

GCT:

-0.66

Martin Ratio

IMMR:

1.14

GCT:

-1.08

Ulcer Index

IMMR:

25.63%

GCT:

40.63%

Daily Std Dev

IMMR:

42.71%

GCT:

92.05%

Max Drawdown

IMMR:

-98.66%

GCT:

-91.11%

Current Drawdown

IMMR:

-87.36%

GCT:

-59.76%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

IMMR:

$281.77M

GCT:

$803.86M

EPS

IMMR:

$1.80

GCT:

$3.17

PE Ratio

IMMR:

4.85

GCT:

6.19

PEG Ratio

IMMR:

-0.45

GCT:

0.37

Total Revenue (TTM)

IMMR:

$759.52M

GCT:

$865.26M

Gross Profit (TTM)

IMMR:

$253.15M

GCT:

$220.25M

EBITDA (TTM)

IMMR:

$126.16M

GCT:

$107.36M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMMR achieves a 1.51% return, which is significantly lower than GCT's 4.32% return.


IMMR

YTD

1.51%

1M

0.58%

6M

-4.84%

1Y

30.87%

5Y*

2.90%

10Y*

0.62%

GCT

YTD

4.32%

1M

-6.30%

6M

-9.17%

1Y

-29.57%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

IMMR vs. GCT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IMMR
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of IMMR is 6363
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of IMMR is 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of IMMR is 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of IMMR is 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of IMMR is 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of IMMR is 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

GCT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GCT is 2121
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GCT is 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GCT is 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GCT is 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GCT is 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GCT is 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

IMMR vs. GCT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Immersion Corporation (IMMR) and GigaCloud Technology Inc (GCT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for IMMR, currently valued at 0.68, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.000.68-0.46
The chart of Sortino ratio for IMMR, currently valued at 1.20, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.20-0.21
The chart of Omega ratio for IMMR, currently valued at 1.15, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.150.98
The chart of Calmar ratio for IMMR, currently valued at 0.76, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.76-0.66
The chart of Martin ratio for IMMR, currently valued at 1.14, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.001.14-1.08
IMMR
GCT

The current IMMR Sharpe Ratio is 0.68, which is higher than the GCT Sharpe Ratio of -0.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMMR and GCT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.502.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
0.68
-0.46
IMMR
GCT

Dividends

IMMR vs. GCT - Dividend Comparison

IMMR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.42%, while GCT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023
IMMR
Immersion Corporation
4.42%2.06%1.70%
GCT
GigaCloud Technology Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

IMMR vs. GCT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMMR drawdown since its inception was -98.66%, which is greater than GCT's maximum drawdown of -91.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMMR and GCT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-34.07%
-59.76%
IMMR
GCT

Volatility

IMMR vs. GCT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Immersion Corporation (IMMR) is 6.11%, while GigaCloud Technology Inc (GCT) has a volatility of 16.70%. This indicates that IMMR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GCT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
6.11%
16.70%
IMMR
GCT

Financials

IMMR vs. GCT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Immersion Corporation and GigaCloud Technology Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab