REG vs. KRG
REG (Regency Centers Corporation) and KRG (Kite Realty Group Trust) are both stocks. Both operate in the REIT - Retail industry within the Real Estate sector. Over the past 10 years, REG returned 3.83%/yr vs 6.02%/yr for KRG. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
REG vs. KRG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, REG achieves a 14.23% return, which is significantly lower than KRG's 20.07% return. Over the past 10 years, REG has underperformed KRG with an annualized return of 3.83%, while KRG has yielded a comparatively higher 6.02% annualized return.
REG
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- -0.95%
- YTD
- 14.23%
- 6M
- 14.10%
- 1Y
- 13.20%
- 3Y*
- 14.59%
- 5Y*
- 7.85%
- 10Y*
- 3.83%
KRG
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 3.37%
- YTD
- 20.07%
- 6M
- 20.37%
- 1Y
- 30.01%
- 3Y*
- 16.04%
- 5Y*
- 9.94%
- 10Y*
- 6.02%
REG vs. KRG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
REG Regency Centers Corporation | 14.23% | -2.78% | 14.90% | 11.85% | -13.59% | 71.41% | -23.86% | 11.43% | -12.00% | 3.62% |
KRG Kite Realty Group Trust | 20.07% | -0.20% | 15.46% | 13.60% | 0.80% | 50.80% | -20.03% | 53.21% | -22.48% | -11.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between REG and KRG is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 11, 2004 | 0.67 |
The correlation between REG and KRG shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (all time) to 0.81 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
REG:
$14.19B
KRG:
$5.76B
REG:
$3.55
KRG:
$1.33
REG:
21.79
KRG:
20.98
REG:
2.13
KRG:
0.01
REG:
8.31
KRG:
7.27
REG:
2.13
KRG:
2.01
REG:
$1.70B
KRG:
$826.57M
REG:
$814.76M
KRG:
$431.97M
REG:
$1.12B
KRG:
$719.77M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
REG vs. KRG — Risk / Return Rank
REG
KRG
REG vs. KRG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Regency Centers Corporation (REG) and Kite Realty Group Trust (KRG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| REG | KRG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.27 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.62 | 3.25 | -1.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.92 | 9.25 | -5.34 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
REG vs. KRG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum REG drawdown since its inception was -73.37%, smaller than the maximum KRG drawdown of -88.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REG and KRG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| REG | KRG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.37% | -88.63% | +15.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.17% | -9.27% | +1.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.10% | -29.07% | +13.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.09% | -29.07% | -1.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.02% | -68.62% | +11.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.73% | -6.19% | +2.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.16% | -45.90% | +29.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.38% | 3.25% | +0.13% |
Volatility
REG vs. KRG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Regency Centers Corporation (REG) is 4.85%, while Kite Realty Group Trust (KRG) has a volatility of 5.51%. This indicates that REG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KRG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| REG | KRG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.85% | 5.51% | -0.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.09% | 12.34% | -1.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.07% | 19.21% | -3.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.34% | 27.01% | -4.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.90% | 36.84% | -6.94% |
Dividends
REG vs. KRG - Dividend Comparison
REG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.84%, less than KRG's 4.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KRG Kite Realty Group Trust | 4.53% | 4.51% | 4.00% | 4.20% | 3.90% | 3.12% | 3.00% | 8.13% | 9.01% | 6.17% | 4.83% | 4.16% |
REG Regency Centers Corporation | 3.84% | 4.16% | 3.67% | 3.91% | 4.04% | 3.20% | 5.22% | 3.71% | 3.78% | 3.04% | 2.90% | 2.85% |
Financials
REG vs. KRG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Regency Centers Corporation and Kite Realty Group Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
REG vs. KRG - Profitability Comparison
REG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Regency Centers Corporation reported a gross profit of 76.40M and revenue of 413.42M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 18.5%.
KRG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kite Realty Group Trust reported a gross profit of 144.76M and revenue of 200.70M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 72.1%.
REG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Regency Centers Corporation reported an operating income of 152.73M and revenue of 413.42M, resulting in an operating margin of 36.9%.
KRG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kite Realty Group Trust reported an operating income of 130.81M and revenue of 200.70M, resulting in an operating margin of 65.2%.
REG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Regency Centers Corporation reported a net income of 128.55M and revenue of 413.42M, resulting in a net margin of 31.1%.
KRG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kite Realty Group Trust reported a net income of 11.39M and revenue of 200.70M, resulting in a net margin of 5.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
REG and KRG have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KRG has higher volatility (5.51%) compared to REG (4.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REG dropped -73.37% vs KRG's -88.63%.
KRG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for REG and KRG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer