REG vs. PECO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Regency Centers Corporation (REG) and Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (PECO).

Performance

REG vs. PECO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Regency Centers Corporation (REG) and Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (PECO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

REG vs. PECO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
REG Regency Centers Corporation	10.67%	-2.78%	14.90%	11.85%	-13.59%	18.06%
PECO Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.	6.13%	-1.59%	6.20%	18.53%	-0.33%	20.40%

Fundamentals

Market Cap REG : $13.85B PECO : $5.20B
EPS REG : $3.45 PECO : $0.79
PE Ratio REG : 21.92 PECO : 47.34
PEG Ratio REG : 0.13 PECO : 0.69
PS Ratio REG : 8.20 PECO : 6.29
PB Ratio REG : 2.07 PECO : 2.27
Total Revenue (TTM) REG : $1.68B PECO : $838.41M
Gross Profit (TTM) REG : $1.02B PECO : $516.86M
EBITDA (TTM) REG : $1.07B PECO : $465.22M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, REG achieves a 10.67% return, which is significantly higher than PECO's 6.13% return.

REG

• 1D: 1.03%
• 1M: -3.29%
• YTD: 10.67%
• 6M: 5.98%
• 1Y: 6.81%
• 3Y*: 11.79%
• 5Y*: 9.91%
• 10Y*: 3.99%

PECO

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: -4.46%
• YTD: 6.13%
• 6M: 11.00%
• 1Y: 6.30%
• 3Y*: 8.36%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

REG vs. PECO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

REG

REG Risk / Return Rank: 54
REG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
REG Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
REG Omega Ratio Rank: 46
REG Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
REG Martin Ratio Rank: 62

PECO

PECO Risk / Return Rank: 53
PECO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
PECO Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
PECO Omega Ratio Rank: 44
PECO Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
PECO Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

REG vs. PECO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Regency Centers Corporation (REG) and Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (PECO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	REG	PECO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.37	0.36	+0.01
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.66	0.65	+0.01
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	1.07	+0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.66	0.75	-0.10
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.01	1.52	+0.49
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

REG vs. PECO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current REG Sharpe Ratio is 0.37, which is comparable to the PECO Sharpe Ratio of 0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of REG and PECO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	REG	PECO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.37	0.36	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.44	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.13	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.32	0.45	-0.13

Correlation

The correlation between REG and PECO is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

REG vs. PECO - Dividend Comparison

REG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.86%, more than PECO's 3.40% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
REG Regency Centers Corporation	3.86%	4.16%	3.67%	3.91%	4.04%	3.20%	5.22%	3.71%	3.78%	3.04%	2.90%	2.85%
PECO Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.	3.40%	3.52%	3.18%	3.12%	3.43%	1.33%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

REG vs. PECO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REG drawdown since its inception was -73.37%, which is greater than PECO's maximum drawdown of -23.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REG and PECO.

Drawdown Indicators

	REG	PECO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-73.37%	-23.11%	-50.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.39%	-10.46%	-1.93%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.09%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-57.02%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.22%	-5.64%	+1.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.25%	-6.68%	-9.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.03%	5.17%	-1.14%

Volatility

REG vs. PECO - Volatility Comparison

Regency Centers Corporation (REG) has a higher volatility of 3.71% compared to Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (PECO) at 3.05%. This indicates that REG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PECO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	REG	PECO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.71%	3.05%	+0.66%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.20%	9.57%	+1.63%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.55%	17.51%	+1.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.52%	22.76%	-0.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.89%	22.76%	+7.13%

Financials

REG vs. PECO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Regency Centers Corporation and Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

REG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Regency Centers Corporation reported a gross profit of 279.85M and revenue of 506.78M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.2%.

PECO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. reported a gross profit of 20.35M and revenue of 187.86M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.8%.

REG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Regency Centers Corporation reported an operating income of 248.13M and revenue of 506.78M, resulting in an operating margin of 49.0%.

PECO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. reported an operating income of -82.27M and revenue of 187.86M, resulting in an operating margin of -43.8%.

REG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Regency Centers Corporation reported a net income of 304.71M and revenue of 506.78M, resulting in a net margin of 60.1%.

PECO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. reported a net income of 47.53M and revenue of 187.86M, resulting in a net margin of 25.3%.