PortfoliosLab logo
REG vs. PECO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between REG and PECO is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.4

Performance

REG vs. PECO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Regency Centers Corporation (REG) and Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (PECO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%60.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
29.66%
42.61%
REG
PECO

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

REG:

1.39

PECO:

0.56

Sortino Ratio

REG:

1.93

PECO:

0.92

Omega Ratio

REG:

1.26

PECO:

1.11

Calmar Ratio

REG:

1.61

PECO:

0.68

Martin Ratio

REG:

7.02

PECO:

1.82

Ulcer Index

REG:

3.94%

PECO:

5.87%

Daily Std Dev

REG:

19.88%

PECO:

19.08%

Max Drawdown

REG:

-73.38%

PECO:

-23.11%

Current Drawdown

REG:

-5.94%

PECO:

-10.91%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

REG:

$13.18B

PECO:

$4.84B

EPS

REG:

$2.11

PECO:

$0.58

PE Ratio

REG:

34.21

PECO:

60.26

PS Ratio

REG:

8.68

PECO:

7.13

PB Ratio

REG:

2.02

PECO:

1.90

Total Revenue (TTM)

REG:

$1.09B

PECO:

$678.99M

Gross Profit (TTM)

REG:

$564.86M

PECO:

$421.87M

EBITDA (TTM)

REG:

$842.88M

PECO:

$434.50M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, REG achieves a -1.10% return, which is significantly higher than PECO's -5.59% return.


REG

YTD

-1.10%

1M

-1.56%

6M

3.32%

1Y

27.41%

5Y*

17.02%

10Y*

5.17%

PECO

YTD

-5.59%

1M

-4.88%

6M

-5.97%

1Y

10.71%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

REG vs. PECO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

REG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of REG is 8888
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of REG is 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of REG is 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of REG is 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of REG is 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of REG is 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

PECO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PECO is 6969
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PECO is 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PECO is 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PECO is 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PECO is 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PECO is 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

REG vs. PECO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Regency Centers Corporation (REG) and Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (PECO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for REG, currently valued at 1.39, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.00
REG: 1.39
PECO: 0.56
The chart of Sortino ratio for REG, currently valued at 1.93, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.00
REG: 1.93
PECO: 0.92
The chart of Omega ratio for REG, currently valued at 1.26, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.00
REG: 1.26
PECO: 1.11
The chart of Calmar ratio for REG, currently valued at 1.61, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.00
REG: 1.61
PECO: 0.68
The chart of Martin ratio for REG, currently valued at 7.02, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.00
REG: 7.02
PECO: 1.82

The current REG Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is higher than the PECO Sharpe Ratio of 0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of REG and PECO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
1.39
0.56
REG
PECO

Dividends

REG vs. PECO - Dividend Comparison

REG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.80%, more than PECO's 3.46% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
REG
Regency Centers Corporation
3.80%3.67%3.91%4.04%3.20%5.22%3.71%3.78%3.04%2.90%2.85%2.95%
PECO
Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.
3.46%3.18%3.12%3.43%1.33%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

REG vs. PECO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REG drawdown since its inception was -73.38%, which is greater than PECO's maximum drawdown of -23.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REG and PECO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-5.94%
-10.91%
REG
PECO

Volatility

REG vs. PECO - Volatility Comparison

Regency Centers Corporation (REG) has a higher volatility of 10.64% compared to Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (PECO) at 8.64%. This indicates that REG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PECO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
10.64%
8.64%
REG
PECO

Financials

REG vs. PECO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Regency Centers Corporation and Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00M300.00M350.00M20212022202320242025
372.54M
178.31M
(REG) Total Revenue
(PECO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

REG vs. PECO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Regency Centers Corporation and Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20212022202320242025
69.3%
71.4%
(REG) Gross Margin
(PECO) Gross Margin
REG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Regency Centers Corporation reported a gross profit of 258.24M and revenue of 372.54M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 69.3%.
PECO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. reported a gross profit of 127.30M and revenue of 178.31M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 71.4%.
REG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Regency Centers Corporation reported an operating income of 135.51M and revenue of 372.54M, resulting in an operating margin of 36.4%.
PECO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. reported an operating income of 49.94M and revenue of 178.31M, resulting in an operating margin of 28.0%.
REG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Regency Centers Corporation reported a net income of 86.48M and revenue of 372.54M, resulting in a net margin of 23.2%.
PECO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. reported a net income of -2.58M and revenue of 178.31M, resulting in a net margin of -1.5%.