REG vs. AKR

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Regency Centers Corporation (REG) and Acadia Realty Trust (AKR).

Performance

REG vs. AKR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Regency Centers Corporation (REG) and Acadia Realty Trust (AKR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

REG vs. AKR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
REG Regency Centers Corporation	10.67%	-2.78%	14.90%	11.85%	-13.59%	71.41%	-23.86%	11.43%	-12.00%	3.62%
AKR Acadia Realty Trust	-5.92%	-11.52%	47.65%	24.36%	-31.18%	58.37%	-44.09%	13.78%	-9.40%	-13.13%

Fundamentals

Market Cap REG : $13.85B AKR : $2.51B
EPS REG : $3.45 AKR : $0.14
PE Ratio REG : 21.92 AKR : 140.98
PS Ratio REG : 8.20 AKR : 5.80
PB Ratio REG : 2.07 AKR : 1.13
Total Revenue (TTM) REG : $1.68B AKR : $410.76M
Gross Profit (TTM) REG : $1.02B AKR : $287.24M
EBITDA (TTM) REG : $1.07B AKR : $213.17M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, REG achieves a 10.67% return, which is significantly higher than AKR's -5.92% return. Over the past 10 years, REG has outperformed AKR with an annualized return of 3.99%, while AKR has yielded a comparatively lower -2.33% annualized return.

REG

• 1D: 1.03%
• 1M: -3.29%
• YTD: 10.67%
• 6M: 5.98%
• 1Y: 6.81%
• 3Y*: 11.79%
• 5Y*: 9.91%
• 10Y*: 3.99%

AKR

• 1D: 2.30%
• 1M: -7.63%
• YTD: -5.92%
• 6M: -3.17%
• 1Y: -4.91%
• 3Y*: 15.77%
• 5Y*: 3.58%
• 10Y*: -2.33%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

REG vs. AKR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

REG

REG Risk / Return Rank: 54
REG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
REG Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
REG Omega Ratio Rank: 46
REG Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
REG Martin Ratio Rank: 62

AKR

AKR Risk / Return Rank: 31
AKR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
AKR Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
AKR Omega Ratio Rank: 28
AKR Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
AKR Martin Ratio Rank: 32

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

REG vs. AKR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Regency Centers Corporation (REG) and Acadia Realty Trust (AKR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	REG	AKR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.37	-0.19	+0.56
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.66	-0.08	+0.74
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	0.99	+0.09
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.66	-0.25	+0.91
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.01	-0.61	+2.63
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

REG vs. AKR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current REG Sharpe Ratio is 0.37, which is higher than the AKR Sharpe Ratio of -0.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of REG and AKR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	REG	AKR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.37	-0.19	+0.56
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.44	0.13	+0.32
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.13	-0.07	+0.20
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.32	0.17	+0.15

Correlation

The correlation between REG and AKR is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

REG vs. AKR - Dividend Comparison

REG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.86%, less than AKR's 4.18% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
REG Regency Centers Corporation	3.86%	4.16%	3.67%	3.91%	4.04%	3.20%	5.22%	3.71%	3.78%	3.04%	2.90%	2.85%
AKR Acadia Realty Trust	4.18%	3.89%	3.06%	4.24%	5.02%	2.75%	2.04%	4.36%	4.59%	3.84%	3.55%	2.93%

Drawdowns

REG vs. AKR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REG drawdown since its inception was -73.37%, roughly equal to the maximum AKR drawdown of -71.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REG and AKR.

Drawdown Indicators

	REG	AKR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-73.37%	-71.02%	-2.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.39%	-17.42%	+5.03%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.09%	-43.82%	+13.73%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-57.02%	-71.02%	+14.00%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.22%	-26.25%	+22.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.25%	-24.41%	+8.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.03%	7.14%	-3.11%

Volatility

REG vs. AKR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Regency Centers Corporation (REG) is 3.71%, while Acadia Realty Trust (AKR) has a volatility of 7.32%. This indicates that REG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AKR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	REG	AKR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.71%	7.32%	-3.61%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.20%	15.52%	-4.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.55%	26.60%	-8.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.52%	28.33%	-5.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.89%	34.27%	-4.38%

Financials

REG vs. AKR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Regency Centers Corporation and Acadia Realty Trust over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

REG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Regency Centers Corporation reported a gross profit of 279.85M and revenue of 506.78M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.2%.

AKR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Acadia Realty Trust reported a gross profit of 72.13M and revenue of 104.77M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.9%.

REG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Regency Centers Corporation reported an operating income of 248.13M and revenue of 506.78M, resulting in an operating margin of 49.0%.

AKR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Acadia Realty Trust reported an operating income of 20.66M and revenue of 104.77M, resulting in an operating margin of 19.7%.

REG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Regency Centers Corporation reported a net income of 304.71M and revenue of 506.78M, resulting in a net margin of 60.1%.

AKR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Acadia Realty Trust reported a net income of 7.71M and revenue of 104.77M, resulting in a net margin of 7.4%.