PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
REG vs. AKR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

REG vs. AKR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Regency Centers Corporation (REG) and Acadia Realty Trust (AKR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, REG achieves a 14.23% return, which is significantly higher than AKR's 4.56% return. Over the past 10 years, REG has outperformed AKR with an annualized return of 3.83%, while AKR has yielded a comparatively lower -0.80% annualized return.


REG

1D
0.62%
1M
-0.95%
YTD
14.23%
6M
14.10%
1Y
13.20%
3Y*
14.59%
5Y*
7.85%
10Y*
3.83%

AKR

1D
0.57%
1M
-3.23%
YTD
4.56%
6M
5.37%
1Y
16.40%
3Y*
21.32%
5Y*
3.88%
10Y*
-0.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

REG vs. AKR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
REG
Regency Centers Corporation
14.23%-2.78%14.90%11.85%-13.59%71.41%-23.86%11.43%-12.00%3.62%
AKR
Acadia Realty Trust
4.56%-11.52%47.65%24.36%-31.18%58.37%-44.09%13.78%-9.40%-13.13%

Correlation

The correlation between REG and AKR is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 1993

0.57

The correlation between REG and AKR shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (all time) to 0.79 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

REG:

$3.55

AKR:

$1.65

PE Ratio

REG:

21.79

AKR:

12.86

PS Ratio

REG:

8.31

AKR:

4.85

Total Revenue (TTM)

REG:

$1.70B

AKR:

$409.36M

Gross Profit (TTM)

REG:

$814.76M

AKR:

$206.52M

EBITDA (TTM)

REG:

$1.12B

AKR:

$319.25M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

REG vs. AKR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

REG
REG Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
REG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
REG Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
REG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
REG Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

AKR
AKR Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
AKR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AKR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
AKR Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
AKR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
AKR Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

REG vs. AKR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Regency Centers Corporation (REG) and Acadia Realty Trust (AKR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


REGAKRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.14

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.62

1.33

+0.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.92

4.46

-0.54

REG vs. AKR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current REG Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is comparable to the AKR Sharpe Ratio of 0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of REG and AKR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

REG vs. AKR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REG drawdown since its inception was -73.37%, roughly equal to the maximum AKR drawdown of -71.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REG and AKR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


REGAKRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.37%

-71.02%

-2.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.17%

-12.41%

+4.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.10%

-31.75%

+16.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.09%

-43.82%

+13.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.02%

-71.02%

+14.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.73%

-18.04%

+14.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.16%

-24.36%

+8.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.38%

3.69%

-0.31%

Volatility

REG vs. AKR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Regency Centers Corporation (REG) is 4.85%, while Acadia Realty Trust (AKR) has a volatility of 8.29%. This indicates that REG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AKR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


REGAKRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.85%

8.29%

-3.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.09%

15.82%

-4.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.07%

22.35%

-6.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.34%

28.13%

-5.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.90%

34.36%

-4.46%

Dividends

REG vs. AKR - Dividend Comparison

REG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.84%, more than AKR's 3.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AKR
Acadia Realty Trust
3.76%3.89%3.06%4.24%5.02%2.75%2.04%4.36%4.59%3.84%3.55%2.93%
REG
Regency Centers Corporation
3.84%4.16%3.67%3.91%4.04%3.20%5.22%3.71%3.78%3.04%2.90%2.85%

Financials

REG vs. AKR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Regency Centers Corporation and Acadia Realty Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M20222023202420252026
413.42M
102.99M
(REG) Total Revenue
(AKR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


REG and AKR have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AKR has higher volatility (8.29%) compared to REG (4.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REG dropped -73.37% vs AKR's -71.02%.

REG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.83 vs 0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for REG and AKR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer