RECS vs. MEME
RECS (Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF) and MEME (Roundhill Meme Stock ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. RECS is passively managed, while MEME is actively managed. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RECS charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for MEME.
Performance
RECS vs. MEME - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RECS achieves a 6.61% return, which is significantly lower than MEME's 79.03% return.
RECS
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- 4.11%
- YTD
- 6.61%
- 6M
- 6.84%
- 1Y
- 25.02%
- 3Y*
- 21.66%
- 5Y*
- 14.04%
- 10Y*
- 9.89%
MEME
- 1D
- -5.29%
- 1M
- 25.28%
- YTD
- 79.03%
- 6M
- 68.18%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RECS vs. MEME - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RECS Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF | 6.61% | 1.87% |
MEME Roundhill Meme Stock ETF | 79.03% | -36.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between RECS and MEME is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2025 | 0.49 |
RECS vs. MEME - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RECS
MEME
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
Real Estate
-
Utilities
Basic Materials
Technology
RECS
MEME
Financial Services
RECS
MEME
Communication Services
RECS
MEME
Consumer Cyclical
RECS
MEME
-
Healthcare
RECS
MEME
Industrials
RECS
MEME
Consumer Defensive
RECS
MEME
-
Energy
RECS
MEME
Real Estate
RECS
MEME
-
Utilities
RECS
MEME
Basic Materials
RECS
MEME
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RECS vs. MEME — Risk / Return Rank
RECS
MEME
RECS vs. MEME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF (RECS) and Roundhill Meme Stock ETF (MEME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RECS | MEME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.85 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.27 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RECS | MEME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.13 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.28 | +0.09 |
Drawdowns
RECS vs. MEME - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RECS drawdown since its inception was -34.29%, smaller than the maximum MEME drawdown of -48.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RECS and MEME.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RECS | MEME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.29% | -48.78% | +14.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.82% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.60% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.08% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.29% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.93% | -5.93% | +5.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.28% | -29.90% | +28.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.04% | — | — |
Volatility
RECS vs. MEME - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RECS | MEME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.97% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.84% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.78% | 74.19% | -62.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.38% | 74.19% | -57.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.22% | 74.19% | -57.97% |
RECS vs. MEME - Expense Ratio Comparison
RECS has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than MEME's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
RECS vs. MEME - Dividend Comparison
RECS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, while MEME has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MEME Roundhill Meme Stock ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RECS Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF | 1.04% | 1.11% | 1.09% | 1.00% | 1.41% | 20.64% | 1.09% | 0.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RECS and MEME have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, RECS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RECS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for MEME.
RECS has the higher dividend yield at 1.04%, compared with 0.00% for MEME.
They also come from different issuers: Ameriprise Financial and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for RECS and 0.69% for MEME.
Find the right allocation for RECS and MEME
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer