PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
RECS vs. VOO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


RECSVOO
YTD Return13.46%11.78%
1Y Return28.57%28.27%
3Y Return (Ann)11.62%10.42%
Sharpe Ratio2.612.56
Daily Std Dev11.40%11.55%
Max Drawdown-34.29%-33.99%
Current Drawdown-0.19%-0.04%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.9

The correlation between RECS and VOO is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

RECS vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, RECS achieves a 13.46% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 11.78% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


60.00%70.00%80.00%90.00%100.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
98.70%
91.48%
RECS
VOO

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF

Vanguard S&P 500 ETF

RECS vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

RECS has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


RECS
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Expense ratio chart for RECS: current value at 0.15% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.15%
Expense ratio chart for VOO: current value at 0.03% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.03%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

RECS vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF (RECS) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RECS
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for RECS, currently valued at 2.61, compared to the broader market0.002.004.002.61
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for RECS, currently valued at 3.74, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.003.74
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for RECS, currently valued at 1.45, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.45
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for RECS, currently valued at 3.09, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.003.09
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for RECS, currently valued at 10.63, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0010.63
VOO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for VOO, currently valued at 2.56, compared to the broader market0.002.004.002.56
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for VOO, currently valued at 3.60, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.003.60
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for VOO, currently valued at 1.44, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.44
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for VOO, currently valued at 2.41, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.002.41
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for VOO, currently valued at 10.16, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0010.16

RECS vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RECS Sharpe Ratio is 2.61, which roughly equals the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.56. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of RECS and VOO.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.00December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
2.61
2.56
RECS
VOO

Dividends

RECS vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

RECS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, less than VOO's 1.32% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
RECS
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
0.88%1.00%1.41%20.64%1.09%0.49%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.32%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%1.85%1.84%

Drawdowns

RECS vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RECS drawdown since its inception was -34.29%, roughly equal to the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RECS and VOO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-5.00%-4.00%-3.00%-2.00%-1.00%0.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-0.19%
-0.04%
RECS
VOO

Volatility

RECS vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF (RECS) has a higher volatility of 3.59% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 3.37%. This indicates that RECS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%2.50%3.00%3.50%4.00%4.50%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
3.59%
3.37%
RECS
VOO